Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

3rd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 21th of April 2009, , Gyeongju, Korea

Published byRuth Watson Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "3rd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 21th of April 2009, , Gyeongju, Korea"— Presentation transcript:

1 3rd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 21th of April 2009, , Gyeongju, Korea
Concluding discussions on work to date B. Garitte and A. Gens (CIMNE – UPC) Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering and Geosciences TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF CATALONIA (UPC)

2 Index (T)H(M) formulation Parameters and constitutive equations
Model setup Comparison of the modelling results Relative humidity (boundary condition) Water balance Pore water pressure Water content Strain Summary of the mechanisms Conclusion

3 (T)H(M) formulation Main balance equation: water mass balance Variation of the water mass in a certain volume (variation of liquid density, gas density, water saturation, gas saturation and porosity) In- and outflux of water to/from that volume (flux of water in the liquid phase and flux of water in the gas phase) Source and sink terms CAS CEA JAEA Quintessa UoE Energy balance Stress equilibrium Air mass balance

4 (T)H(M) formulation Main balance equation: water mass balance Variation of the water mass in a certain volume (variation of liquid density, gas density, water saturation, gas saturation and porosity) In- and outflux of water to/from that volume (flux of water in the liquid phase and flux of water in the gas phase) Source and sink terms CAS CEA JAEA Quintessa UoE Energy balance Stress equilibrium Air mass balance

5 (T)H(M) formulation Main balance equation: water mass balance Variation of the water mass in a certain volume (variation of liquid density, gas density, water saturation, gas saturation and porosity) In- and outflux of water to/from that volume (flux of water in the liquid phase and flux of water in the gas phase) Source and sink terms CAS CEA JAEA Quintessa UoE Energy balance Stress equilibrium Air mass balance

6 (T)H(M) formulation Main balance equation: water mass balance Variation of the water mass in a certain volume (variation of liquid density, gas density, water saturation, gas saturation and porosity) In- and outflux of water to/from that volume (flux of water in the liquid phase and flux of water in the gas phase) Source and sink terms CAS CEA JAEA Quintessa UoE Energy balance Stress equilibrium Air mass balance

7 (T)H(M) formulation Main balance equation: water mass balance Variation of the water mass in a certain volume (variation of liquid density, gas density, water saturation, gas saturation and porosity) In- and outflux of water to/from that volume (flux of water in the liquid phase and flux of water in the gas phase) Source and sink terms CAS CEA JAEA Quintessa UoE Bishop effective stress Energy balance CAS CEA JAEA Quintessa UoE Stress equilibrium CAS CEA JAEA Quintessa UoE Stiffness against suction Air mass balance CAS CEA JAEA Quintessa UoE

8 Parameters and constitutive equations
Step 0 CAS CEA JAEA Quint. UoE Physical Solid grain density ρs [kg/m3] 2710   2710  2700 Porosity φ 0.165   0.16  0.162 Hydraulic Intrinsic permeability k [m2]  7.5E-20 2E-20  2E-20  1.69E-19 1.9E-20  Dynamic viscosity μ [Pa.s] 1E-3 2.9E-4 Liquid relative permeability λ’  0.4  0.68  0.65 0.3  Vapour diffusion coefficient  6E-6 5E-6  Mechanical Young modulus E [GPa]  6 1.5 Poisson coefficient ν  0.27  0.3 Friction angle φ [º] Cohesion c [MPa] Hydro-Mech. coupling Suction bulk modulus Ks [GPa] Air entry value (retention curve) P0 [MPa]  3.9  8 Shape parameter (retention curve) λ 0.128  0.15 Maximum suction (retention curve)* Ps [MPa] 700 Second shape parameter (retention curve)* λs  2.73 2.73  Residual and maximum saturation (retention curve) Srl – Srs  0 – 1  0 - 1 * Modified Van Genuchten

9 Parameters and constitutive equations
Step 1 CAS CEA JAEA Quint. UoE Physical Solid grain density ρs [kg/m3] 2710   2710  2700 Porosity φ 0.165   0.16  0.162 Hydraulic Intrinsic permeability k [m2]  7.5E-20 1E-19  2E-20  1.13E-19 1.9E-20  Dynamic viscosity μ [Pa.s] 1E-3 2.9E-4 Liquid relative permeability λ’  0.4  0.65 0.3  Vapour diffusion coefficient  6E-6  ? 5E-6  Mechanical Young modulus E [GPa]  6  1 1.5 Poisson coefficient ν  0.27  0.3 Friction angle φ [º] Cohesion c [MPa] Hydro-Mech. coupling Suction bulk modulus Ks [GPa]  1.1E-4**  dif. Air entry value (retention curve) P0 [MPa]  3.9  8 Shape parameter (retention curve) λ 0.128  0.15 Maximum suction (retention curve)* Ps [MPa] 700 Second shape parameter (retention curve)* λs  2.73 2.73  Residual and maximum saturation (retention curve) Srl – Srs  0 – 1  0 - 1 * Modified Van Genuchten ** Moisture swelling coeff. [-] (Not defined in report)

10 Parameters and constitutive equations
Water retention curve

11 Parameters and constitutive equations
Dependency of permeability on saturation

12 Parameters and constitutive equations
Dependency of permeability on saturation

13 Model setup Isotropic conditions σ =3.2MPa, pw =1.21MPa 1.21MPa 3.2MPa
Plane strain 0-flow on all borders, excepted on top Isothermal (T=15º) 130m 1.85MPa 4.9MPa 2.49MPa 6.6MPa pw σ 130m

14 Model setup Application of Relative Humidity 1.3m
σ =3.2MPa, pw =1.21MPa 1.21MPa 3.2MPa Plane strain 0-flow on all borders, excepted on top Isothermal (T=15º) 130m 1.85MPa 4.9MPa 2.49MPa 6.6MPa pw σ 130m

15 Comparison of the modelling results
Relative humidity (boundary condition) Model: at MT wall Measurements: in the MT

16 Comparison of the modelling results
Relative humidity (boundary condition) 2cm inside

17 Comparison of the modelling results
Relative humidity cm inside

18 Comparison of the modelling results
Relative humidity 35cm inside Only 3 measurements are usable Measurements equal at 35cm and at 27cm Lack of measurements between 2 and 25cm

19 Comparison of the modelling results
Water balance

20 Comparison of the modelling results
Pore water pressure Measurements Inconsistent measurements (according to our models) Number of sensors in suction (determination of suction limit, but…)

21 Comparison of the modelling results
Pore water pressure Between 1.8 and 2.1m

22 Comparison of the modelling results
Pore water pressure Between 1.8 and 2.1m

23 Comparison of the modelling results
Pore water pressure Between 1.8 and 2.1m Effect of the instrumentation? Type of sensor No Measuring principle Boreholes Filling material In-borehole Pore Pressure System 4 Piezo-resistive (piezometer) BVE-1 Cement-bentonite Mini- piezometer 24 32 Resin Humidity 16 Psychrometer Cement-resin Capacitive 14 Mini-extensometer 8 Potentiometer None Electrode rods 4 + Surf. Resistance Change Compacted rock powder TDR 10 ¿Resin? MH coupling?

24 Comparison of the modelling results
Pore water pressure Initial conditions

25 Comparison of the modelling results
Pore water pressure

26 Comparison of the modelling results
Pore water pressure

27 Comparison of the modelling results
Pore water pressure

28 Comparison of the modelling results
Pore water pressure

29 Comparison of the modelling results
Water content Initial conditions

30 Comparison of the modelling results
Water content porosity wcon [%] 0.14 6.03 0.15 6.54 0.16 7.05 0.17 7.59 0.18 8.13 BVE85: 104kg BVE86: 858kg

31 Comparison of the modelling results
Strain

32 Comparison of the modelling results
Strain

33 Summary of the mechanisms
Evaporation Desaturation Dominant water transport mode: vapour diffusion in the gas phase (non advective) Reduction of the permeability Dominant water transport mode: Darcy flow in the liquid phase (advective)

34 Summary of the mechanisms
Quintessa

35 Summary of the mechanisms
Quintessa

36 Conclusions Task A is largely on schedule… Thank you for your efforts.
Globally good results, but improvements are required. Sensitivity analysis is advised before starting with advanced modelling in step 2. Step 2 will be: advanced HM modelling making a blind prediction of phase II using the calibration from phase I. Suggested additional features (non inclusive): Anisotropy (permeability, stress state) Work on initial conditions Damage Try to explain the “inconsistent” set of pore water pressure measurements The fast pore water pressure response. Modelling the instrumentation boreholes (one of them)? MH coupling? Do not forget the deadline for the internal report on step 0. Article for the TT conference will be built on that basis. Try to deliver your results on time!

Download ppt "3rd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 21th of April 2009, , Gyeongju, Korea"

Similar presentations

Granular flow in silos - observations and comments

Granular flow in silos - observations and comments
A mathematical model of steady-state cavitation in Diesel injectors S. Martynov, D. Mason, M. Heikal, S. Sazhin Internal Engine Combustion Group School.

A mathematical model of steady-state cavitation in Diesel injectors S. Martynov, D. Mason, M. Heikal, S. Sazhin Internal Engine Combustion Group School.
Institut für Meteorologie und Klimatologie Universität Hannover

Institut für Meteorologie und Klimatologie Universität Hannover
ENGINEERING MATERIAL PROPERTIES (CE1303)

ENGINEERING MATERIAL PROPERTIES (CE1303)
Pore-Pressure Generation During CPT Probe Advancement By Michael Fitzgerald.

Pore-Pressure Generation During CPT Probe Advancement By Michael Fitzgerald.
Conductivity Testing of Unsaturated Soils A Presentation to the Case Western Reserve University May 6, 2004 By Andrew G. Heydinger Department of Civil.

Conductivity Testing of Unsaturated Soils A Presentation to the Case Western Reserve University May 6, 2004 By Andrew G. Heydinger Department of Civil.
Chapter (1) Geotechnical Properties of Soil

Chapter (1) Geotechnical Properties of Soil
Ground-Water Flow and Solute Transport for the PHAST Simulator Ken Kipp and David Parkhurst.

Ground-Water Flow and Solute Transport for the PHAST Simulator Ken Kipp and David Parkhurst.
Subsurface Air Flow Air is a fluid (but not a liquid) that behaves similarly to water We see pressure changes in the subsurface due to barometric pressure.

Subsurface Air Flow Air is a fluid (but not a liquid) that behaves similarly to water We see pressure changes in the subsurface due to barometric pressure.
Introduction to the Ventilation Experiment (VE) and Task A B. Garitte and A. Gens (CIMNE – UPC) Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering and Geosciences TECHNICAL.

Introduction to the Ventilation Experiment (VE) and Task A B. Garitte and A. Gens (CIMNE – UPC) Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering and Geosciences TECHNICAL.
Summary of results to date B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering.

Summary of results to date B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering.
Preliminary Assessment of Porous Gas-Cooled and Thin- Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, UCSD (March 2004)

Preliminary Assessment of Porous Gas-Cooled and Thin- Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, UCSD (March 2004)
Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.
D2011 Project CEA-IRSN Results Alain MILLARD, Frédéric DELERUYELLE Wakkanai, Japan, October 20-23, 2008 Task A - STEPS 0/1.

D2011 Project CEA-IRSN Results Alain MILLARD, Frédéric DELERUYELLE Wakkanai, Japan, October 20-23, 2008 Task A - STEPS 0/1.
Advanced Energy Technology Group Mechanisms of Aerosol Generation in Liquid-Protected IFE Chambers M. S. Tillack, A. R. Raffray.

Advanced Energy Technology Group Mechanisms of Aerosol Generation in Liquid-Protected IFE Chambers M. S. Tillack, A. R. Raffray.
Chapter 9 Solids and Fluids

Chapter 9 Solids and Fluids
University of South Carolina FCR Laboratory Dept. of Chemical Engineering By W. K. Lee, S. Shimpalee, J. Glandt and J. W. Van Zee Fuel Cell Research Laboratory.

University of South Carolina FCR Laboratory Dept. of Chemical Engineering By W. K. Lee, S. Shimpalee, J. Glandt and J. W. Van Zee Fuel Cell Research Laboratory.
Status report on Step1 of Task A, DECOVALEX-2011 modeling for Ventilation Experiment –modeling for Ventilation Experiment By Xiaoyan Liu, Chengyuan Zhang.

Status report on Step1 of Task A, DECOVALEX-2011 modeling for Ventilation Experiment –modeling for Ventilation Experiment By Xiaoyan Liu, Chengyuan Zhang.
D2011 Project CEA-IRSN Results Alain MILLARD, Frédéric DELERUYELLE Gyeongju, Korea, April 20-23, 2009 Task A - STEPS 0/1.

D2011 Project CEA-IRSN Results Alain MILLARD, Frédéric DELERUYELLE Gyeongju, Korea, April 20-23, 2009 Task A - STEPS 0/1.
Current Status of CAS Team on Task A Step 0: Model Inception two-phase flowmodeling for the laboratory drying test – two-phase flow modeling for the laboratory.

Current Status of CAS Team on Task A Step 0: Model Inception two-phase flowmodeling for the laboratory drying test – two-phase flow modeling for the laboratory.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google