1. 20
Phylogeny

2. Investigating the Evolutionary History of Life
Legless lizards and snakes evolved from different lineages of lizards with legs
Legless lizards have evolved independently in several different groups through adaptation to similar environments
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

3. Figure 20.1 What kind of organism is this?
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

4. No limbs Eastern glass lizard Monitor lizard Iguanas ANCESTRAL LIZARD
Figure 20.2
No limbs
Eastern glass lizard
Monitor lizard
Iguanas
ANCESTRAL
LIZARD
(with limbs)
Snakes
Figure 20.2 Convergent evolution of limbless bodies
No limbs
Geckos
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

5. Phylogeny is the evolutionary history of a species or group of related species
The discipline of systematics classifies organisms and determines their evolutionary relationships
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 5

6. Concept 20.1: Phylogenies show evolutionary relationships
Organisms share many characteristics because of common ancestry
Taxonomy is the ordered division and naming of organisms
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 6

7. Binomial Nomenclature
In the 18th century, Carolus Linnaeus published a system of taxonomy based on resemblances
Two key features of his system remain useful today: two-part names for species and hierarchical classification
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 7

8. The two-part scientific name of a species is called a binomial
The first part of the name is the genus
The second part, called the specific epithet, is unique for each species within the genus
The first letter of the genus is capitalized, and the entire species name is italicized
Both parts together name the species (not the specific epithet alone)
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 8

9. Hierarchical Classification
Linnaeus introduced a system for grouping species in increasingly broad categories
The taxonomic groups from narrow to broad are species, genus, family, order, class, phylum, kingdom, and domain
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 9

10. Domain: Bacteria Kingdom: Animalia Domain: Archaea Domain: Eukarya
Figure 20.3
Species: Panthera pardus
Genus: Panthera
Family: Felidae
Order: Carnivora
Class: Mammalia
Figure 20.3 Linnaean classification
Phylum: Chordata
Domain: Bacteria
Kingdom:
Animalia
Domain:
Archaea
Domain:
Eukarya
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

11. A taxonomic unit at any level of hierarchy is called a taxon
The broader taxa are not comparable between lineages
For example, an order of snails has less genetic diversity than an order of mammals
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 11

12. Linking Classification and Phylogeny
Systematists depict evolutionary relationships in branching phylogenetic trees
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 12

13. Order Family Genus Species Panthera Felidae Panthera pardus (leopard)
Figure 20.4
Order
Family Genus
Species
Panthera
Felidae
Panthera
pardus
(leopard)
Taxidea
Carnivora
Taxidea
taxus
(American
badger)
Mustelidae
Lutra
Lutra lutra
(European
otter)
Figure 20.4 The connection between classification and phylogeny
Canis
latrans
(coyote)
Canidae
Canis
Canis
lupus
(gray wolf)
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

14. Linnaean classification and phylogeny can differ from each other
Systematists have proposed that classification be based entirely on evolutionary relationships
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 14

15. Sister taxa are groups that share an immediate common ancestor
A phylogenetic tree represents a hypothesis about evolutionary relationships
Each branch point represents the divergence of two taxa from a common ancestor
Sister taxa are groups that share an immediate common ancestor
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 15

16. A polytomy is a branch from which more than two groups emerge
A rooted tree includes a branch to represent the most recent common ancestor of all taxa in the tree
A basal taxon diverges early in the history of a group and originates near the common ancestor of the group
A polytomy is a branch from which more than two groups emerge
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 16

17. where lineages diverge Taxon A
Figure 20.5
Branch point:
where lineages diverge
Taxon A
Taxon B
Sister
taxa
Taxon C
Taxon D
Taxon E
ANCESTRAL
LINEAGE
Taxon F
Figure 20.5 How to read a phylogenetic tree
Basal
taxon
Taxon G
This branch point
represents the common
ancestor of taxa A–G.
This branch point forms a
polytomy: an unresolved
pattern of divergence.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

18. What We Can and Cannot Learn from Phylogenetic Trees
Phylogenetic trees show patterns of descent, not phenotypic similarity
Phylogenetic trees do not generally indicate when a species evolved or how much change occurred in a lineage
It should not be assumed that a taxon evolved from the taxon next to it
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 18

19. Applying Phylogenies
Phylogeny provides important information about similar characteristics in closely related species
Phylogenetic trees based on DNA sequences can be used to infer species identities
For example: A phylogeny was used to identify the species of whale from which “whale meat” originated
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 19

20. Results Minke (Southern Hemisphere) mtDNA Unknown mtDNA #1a,
Figure 20.6
Results
Minke (Southern
Hemisphere) mtDNA
Unknown mtDNA #1a,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Minke (North
Atlantic) mtDNA
Unknown mtDNA #9
Humpback mtDNA
Unknown mtDNA #1b
Figure 20.6 Inquiry: What is the species identity of food being sold as whale meat?
Blue mtDNA
Unknown mtDNA #10,
11, 12, 13
Fin mtDNA
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

21. Concept 20.2: Phylogenies are inferred from morphological and molecular data
To infer phylogeny, systematists gather information about morphologies, genes, and biochemistry of the relevant organisms
The similarities used to infer phylogenies must result from shared ancestry
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 21

22. Morphological and Molecular Homologies
Phenotypic and genetic similarities due to shared ancestry are called homologies
Organisms with similar morphologies or DNA sequences are likely to be more closely related than organisms with different structures or sequences
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 22

23. Sorting Homology from Analogy
When constructing a phylogeny, systematists need to distinguish whether a similarity is the result of homology or analogy
Homology is similarity due to shared ancestry
Analogy is similarity due to convergent evolution
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 23

24. Convergent evolution occurs when similar environmental pressures and natural selection produce similar (analogous) adaptations in organisms from different evolutionary lineages
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 24

25. Australian marsupial mole
Figure 20.7
Australian marsupial mole
Figure 20.7 Convergent evolution in burrowers
North American eutherian mole
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

26. Bat and bird wings are homologous as forelimbs, but analogous as functional wings
Analogous structures or molecular sequences that evolved independently are also called homoplasies
Homology can be distinguished from analogy by comparing fossil evidence and the degree of complexity
The more complex two similar structures are, the more likely it is that they are homologous
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 26

27. Evaluating Molecular Homologies
Molecular homologies are determined based on the degree of similarity in nucleotide sequence between taxa
Systematists use computer programs when analyzing comparable DNA segments from different organisms
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 27

28. Figure 20.8-s1 1 C A T G 2 C A T G
Figure 20.8-s1 Aligning segments of DNA (step 1)
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

29. 1 2 Deletion 1 2 Insertion C A T G C A T G C A T G C A T G G T A
Figure 20.8-s2 1 C A T G 2 C A T G
Deletion 1 C A T G 2 C A T G G T A
Insertion
Figure 20.8-s2 Aligning segments of DNA (step 2)
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

30. 1 2 Deletion 1 2 Insertion 1 2 C A T G C A T G C A T G C A T G G T A C
Figure 20.8-s3 1 C A T G 2 C A T G
Deletion 1 C A T G 2 C A T G G T A
Insertion 1 C A T G
Figure 20.8-s3 Aligning segments of DNA (step 3) 2 C A T G
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

31. 1 2 Deletion 1 2 Insertion 1 2 1 2 C A T G C A T G C A T G C A T G G T
Figure 20.8-s4 1 C A T G 2 C A T G
Deletion 1 C A T G 2 C A T G G T A
Insertion 1 C A T G
Figure 20.8-s4 Aligning segments of DNA (step 4) 2 C A T G 1 C A T G 2 C A T G
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

32. Shared bases in nucleotide sequences that are otherwise very dissimilar are called molecular homoplasies
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 32

33. A C G G A T A G T C C A C T A G G C A C T A
Figure 20.9
A C G G A T A G T C C A C T A G G C A C T A
T C A C C G A C A G G T C T T T G A C T A G
Figure 20.9 A molecular homoplasy
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

34. Concept 20.3: Shared characters are used to construct phylogenetic trees
Once homologous characters have been identified, they can be used to infer a phylogeny
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 34

35. Cladistics Cladistics classifies organisms by common descent
A clade is a group of species that includes an ancestral species and all its descendants
Clades can be nested within larger clades, but not all groupings of organisms qualify as clades
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 35

36. A valid clade is monophyletic, signifying that it consists of the ancestor species and all its descendants
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 36

37. (a) Monophyletic group (clade)
Figure
(a) Monophyletic group (clade) A B
Group I C D E
Figure Monophyletic, paraphyletic, and polyphyletic groups (part 1: monophyletic) F G
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

38. A paraphyletic grouping consists of an ancestral species and some, but not all, of the descendants
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 38

39. (b) Paraphyletic group
Figure
(b) Paraphyletic group A B C D E
Group II
Figure Monophyletic, paraphyletic, and polyphyletic groups (part 2: paraphyletic) F G
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

40. A polyphyletic grouping consists of various taxa with different ancestors
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 40

41. (c) Polyphyletic group
Figure
(c) Polyphyletic group A B
Group III C D E
Figure Monophyletic, paraphyletic, and polyphyletic groups (part 3: polyphyletic) F G
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

42. (a) Monophyletic group (clade) (b) Paraphyletic group
Figure 20.10
(a) Monophyletic group (clade)
(b) Paraphyletic group
(c) Polyphyletic group A A A B
Group I B B
Group III C C C D D D E E
Group II E
Figure Monophyletic, paraphyletic, and polyphyletic groups F F F G G G
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

43. In a paraphyletic group, the most recent common ancestor of all members of the group is part of the group
In a polyphyletic group, the most recent common ancestor is not part of the group
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 43

44. Paraphyletic group Common ancestor of even-toed Other even-toed
Figure 20.11
Paraphyletic group
Common
ancestor of
even-toed
ungulates
Other even-toed
ungulates
Hippopotamuses
Cetaceans
Seals
Figure Paraphyletic vs. polyphyletic groups
Bears
Other
carnivores
Polyphyletic group
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

45. Shared Ancestral and Shared Derived Characters
In comparison with its ancestor, an organism has both shared and different characteristics
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 45

46. A shared ancestral character is a character that originated in an ancestor of the taxon
A shared derived character is an evolutionary novelty unique to a particular clade
A character can be both ancestral and derived, depending on the context
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 46

47. Inferring Phylogenies Using Derived Characters
When inferring evolutionary relationships, it is useful to know in which clade a shared derived character first appeared
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 47

48. TAXA Lancelet (outgroup) (outgroup) Lancelet Lamprey Leopard Bass
Figure 20.12
TAXA
Lancelet
(outgroup)
(outgroup)
Lancelet
Lamprey
Leopard
Bass
Turtle
Frog
Lamprey
Vertebral column
(backbone) 1 1 1 1 1
Bass
Vertebral
column
CHARACTERS
Hinged jaws 1 1 1 1
Frog
Hinged jaws
Four limbs 1 1 1
Turtle
Amnion 1 1
Four limbs
Figure Using derived characters to infer phylogeny
Hair 1
Amnion
Leopard
Hair
(a) Character table
(b) Phylogenetic tree
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

49. TAXA (outgroup) Lancelet Lamprey Leopard Turtle Bass Frog
Figure
TAXA
(outgroup)
Lancelet
Lamprey
Leopard
Turtle
Bass
Frog
Vertebral column
(backbone) 1 1 1 1 1
CHARACTERS
Hinged jaws 1 1 1 1
Four limbs 1 1 1
Figure Using derived characters to infer phylogeny (part 1: character table)
Amnion 1 1
Hair 1
(a) Character table
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

50. Lancelet (outgroup) Lamprey Bass Vertebral column Frog Hinged jaws
Figure
Lancelet
(outgroup)
Lamprey
Bass
Vertebral
column
Frog
Hinged jaws
Figure Using derived characters to infer phylogeny (part 2: phylogenetic tree)
Turtle
Four limbs
Amnion
Leopard
Hair
(b) Phylogenetic tree
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

51. The outgroup is a group that has diverged before the ingroup
An outgroup is a species or group of species that is closely related to the ingroup, the various species being studied
The outgroup is a group that has diverged before the ingroup
Systematists compare each ingroup species with the outgroup to differentiate between shared derived and shared ancestral characteristics
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 51

52. Characters shared by the outgroup and ingroup are ancestral characters that predate the divergence of both groups from a common ancestor
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 52

53. Phylogenetic Trees with Proportional Branch Lengths
In some trees, the length of a branch can reflect the number of genetic changes that have taken place in a particular DNA sequence in that lineage
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 53

54. Drosophila Lancelet Zebrafish Frog Chicken Human Mouse Figure 20.13
Figure Branch lengths can represent genetic change.
Human
Mouse
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

55. In other trees, branch length can represent chronological time, and branching points can be determined from the fossil record
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 55

56. Drosophila Lancelet Zebrafish Frog Chicken Human Mouse 500 400 300 200
Figure 20.14
Drosophila
Lancelet
Zebrafish
Frog
Chicken
Figure Branch lengths can indicate time.
Human
Mouse
500
400
300
200
100
Present
Millions of years ago
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

57. Maximum Parsimony
Systematists can never be sure of finding the best tree in a large data set
They narrow possibilities by applying the principle of maximum parsimony
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 57

58. Computer programs are used to search for trees that are parsimonious
Maximum parsimony assumes that the tree that requires the fewest evolutionary events (appearances of shared derived characters) is the most likely
Computer programs are used to search for trees that are parsimonious
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 58

59. Three phylogenetic hypotheses:
Figure 20.15
Technique
1/C
1/C I I
III II
III II
1/C
III II I
Species I
Species II
Species III
1/C
1/C
Three phylogenetic hypotheses:
3/A
2/T
3/A I I
III I I
III
2/T
3/A
4/C II
III II II
III II
4/C
4/C
2/T
III II I
III II I
3/A
4/C
2/T
4/C
2/T
3/A
Site
Figure Research method: applying parsimony to a problem in molecular systematics 1 2 3 4
Results
Species I C T A T I I
III
Species II C T T C II
III II
Species III A G A C
III II I
Ancestral sequence A G T T
6 events
7 events
7 events
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

60. Technique Species I Species II Species III
Figure
Technique
Species I
Species II
Species III
Three phylogenetic hypotheses:
Figure Research method: applying parsimony to a problem in molecular systematics (part 1: hypotheses) I I
III II
III II
III II I
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

61. Technique Site 1 2 3 4 Species I C T A T Species II C T T C
Figure
Technique
Site 1 2 3 4
Species I C T A T
Species II C T T C
Species III A G A C
Figure Research method: applying parsimony to a problem in molecular systematics (part 2: table)
Ancestral sequence A G T T
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

62. Technique 1/C I I III 1/C II III II 1/C III II I 1/C 1/C 3/A 2/T 3/A I
Figure
Technique
1/C I I
III
1/C II
III II
1/C
III II I
1/C
1/C
3/A
2/T
3/A I I
III
Figure Research method: applying parsimony to a problem in molecular systematics (part 3: comparison)
2/T
3/A
4/C II
III II
4/C
4/C
2/T
III II I
3/A 4/C
2/T 4/C
2/T 3/A
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

63. Results I I III II III II III II I 6 events 7 events 7 events
Figure
Results I I
III II
III II
III II I
Figure Research method: applying parsimony to a problem in molecular systematics (part 4: results)
6 events
7 events
7 events
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

64. Phylogenetic Trees as Hypotheses
The best hypothesized phylogenetic tree fits the most data: morphological, molecular, and fossil
Phylogenetic hypotheses are modified when new evidence arises
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 64

65. Phylogenetic bracketing allows us to predict features of ancestors and their extinct descendants based on the features of closely related living descendants
For example, phylogenetic bracketing allows us to infer characteristics of dinosaurs based on shared characters in modern birds and crocodiles
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 65

66. †Saurischian dinosaurs other than birds
Figure 20.16
Lizards
and snakes
Crocodilians
†Ornithischian
dinosaurs
Common
ancestor of
crocodilians,
dinosaurs,
and birds
†Saurischian dinosaurs other than birds
Figure A phylogenetic tree of birds and their close relatives
Birds
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

67. Birds and crocodiles share several features: four-chambered hearts, song, nest building, and egg brooding
These characteristics likely evolved in a common ancestor and were shared by all of its descendants, including dinosaurs
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 67

68. Figure 20.17 A crocodile guards its nest.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

69. The fossil record supports nest building and brooding in dinosaurs
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 69

70. (a) Fossil remains of Oviraptor and eggs
Figure 20.18
Front limb
Hind limb
Eggs
Figure Fossil support for a phylogenetic prediction: Dinosaurs built nests and brooded their eggs.
(a) Fossil remains of Oviraptor and eggs
(b) Artist’s reconstruction of the dinosaur’s posture based on the fossil findings
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

71. (a) Fossil remains of Oviraptor and eggs
Figure
Front limb
Hind limb
Figure Fossil support for a phylogenetic prediction: Dinosaurs built nests and brooded their eggs. (part 1: fossil)
Eggs
(a) Fossil remains of Oviraptor and eggs
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

72. Concept 20.4: Molecular clocks help track evolutionary time
To extend molecular phylogenies beyond the fossil record, we must make an assumption about how molecular change occurs over time
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 72

73. Molecular Clocks
A molecular clock uses constant rates of evolution in some genes to estimate the absolute time of evolutionary change
The number of nucleotide substitutions in related genes is assumed to be proportional to the time since they last shared a common ancestor
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 73

74. Individual genes vary in how clocklike they are
Molecular clocks are calibrated by plotting the number of genetic changes against the dates of branch points known from the fossil record
Individual genes vary in how clocklike they are
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 74

75. Divergence time (millions of years)
Figure 20.19 90
Number of mutations 60 30
Figure A molecular clock for mammals 30 60 90
120
Divergence time (millions of years)
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

76. Differences in Clock Speed
Some mutations are selectively neutral and have little or no effect on fitness
Neutral mutations should be regular like a clock
The mutation rate is dependent on how critical a gene’s amino acid sequence is to survival
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 76

77. Potential Problems with Molecular Clocks
Molecular clocks do not run as smoothly as expected if mutations were selectively neutral
Irregularities result from natural selection in which some DNA changes are favored over others
Estimates of evolutionary divergences older than the fossil record have a high degree of uncertainty
The use of multiple genes may improve estimates
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 77

78. Applying a Molecular Clock: Dating the Origin of HIV
Phylogenetic analysis shows that HIV is descended from viruses that infect chimpanzees and other primates
HIV spread to humans more than once
Comparison of HIV samples shows that the virus evolved in a very clocklike way
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 78

79. Animation: Class Schemes
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

80. Index of base changes between HIV
Figure 20.20
Index of base changes between HIV
gene sequences
0.15
HIV
0.10
Range
Adjusted best-fit line
(accounts for uncertain
dates of HIV sequences)
0.05
Figure Dating the origin of HIV-1 M
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
Year
© 2000 AAAS
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

81. Application of a molecular clock to one strain of HIV suggests that that strain spread to humans during the 1930s
A more advanced molecular clock approach has dated the origin of that strain to about 1910
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 81

82. Concept 20.5: New information continues to revise our understanding of evolutionary history
Recently, systematists have gained insight into the very deepest branches of the tree of life through analysis of DNA sequence data
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 82

83. From Two Kingdoms to Three Domains
Early taxonomists classified all species as either plants or animals
Later, five kingdoms were recognized: Monera (prokaryotes), Protista, Plantae, Fungi, and Animalia
More recently, the three-domain system has been adopted: Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya
The three-domain system is supported by data from many sequenced genomes
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 83

84. Euglenozoans Forams Diatoms Domain Eukarya Ciliates Red algae
Figure 20.21
Euglenozoans
Forams
Diatoms
Domain Eukarya
Ciliates
Red algae
Green algae
Plants
Amoebas
Fungi
Animals
Nanoarchaeotes
Archaea
Domain
Euryarcheotes
Crenarcheotes
COMMON
ANCESTOR
OF ALL LIFE
Figure The three domains of life
Proteobacteria
(Mitochondria)*
Domain Bacteria
Chlamydias
Spirochetes
Gram-positive
bacteria
Cyanobacteria
(Chloroplasts)*
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

85. Euglenozoans Forams Diatoms Domain Eukarya Ciliates Red algae
Figure
Euglenozoans
Forams
Diatoms
Domain Eukarya
Ciliates
Red algae
Green algae
Plants
Figure The three domains of life (part 1: eukarya)
Amoebas
Fungi
Animals
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

86. Nanoarchaeotes Archaea Domain Euryarcheotes Crenarcheotes
Figure
Nanoarchaeotes
Archaea
Domain
Euryarcheotes
Crenarcheotes
Figure The three domains of life (part 2: archaea)
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

87. Proteobacteria (Mitochondria)* Domain Bacteria Chlamydias Spirochetes
Figure
Proteobacteria
(Mitochondria)*
Domain Bacteria
Chlamydias
Spirochetes
Gram-positive
bacteria
Figure The three domains of life (part 3: bacteria)
Cyanobacteria
(Chloroplasts)*
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

88. Domains Bacteria and Archaea are single-celled prokaryotes
The three-domain system highlights the importance of single-celled organisms in the history of life
Domains Bacteria and Archaea are single-celled prokaryotes
Only three lineages in the domain Eukarya are dominated by multicellular organisms, kingdoms Plantae, Fungi, and Animalia
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 88

89. The Important Role of Horizontal Gene Transfer
The tree of life suggests that eukaryotes and archaea are more closely related to each other than to bacteria
The tree of life is based largely on rRNA genes, which have evolved slowly, allowing detection of homologies between distantly related organisms
Other genes indicate different evolutionary relationships
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 89

90. Horizontal gene transfer complicates efforts to build a tree of life
There have been substantial interchanges of genes between organisms in different domains
Horizontal gene transfer is the movement of genes from one genome to another
Horizontal gene transfer occurs by exchange of transposable elements and plasmids, viral infection, and fusion of organisms
Horizontal gene transfer complicates efforts to build a tree of life
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 90

91. Horizontal gene transfer may have been common enough that the early history of life is better depicted by a tangled web than a branching tree
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd. 91

92. Domain Eukarya Archaea Domain Ancestral cell populations
Figure 20.22
Domain Eukarya
Ani
malia
Fungi
Plantae
Chloropl
asts
Archaea
Domain
Mitochondria
Methanogens
Ancestral cell
populations
Thermophiles
Figure A tangled web of life
Cyanobacteria
Domain Bacteria
Proteobacteria
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

93. alia Anim Domain Eukarya Fungi Plantae Mito Chlo ch Ancestral cell
Figure
Anim
alia
Domain Eukarya
Fungi
Plantae
Mito
ondria ch
Chlo
asts
ropl
Ancestral cell
populations
Figure A tangled web of life (part 1: eukarya)
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

94. Methanogens Archaea Domain M it o c h ndri a Chlo asts ropl
Figure
Methanogens
Archaea
Domain M it o c h
ndri a
Chlo
asts
ropl
Thermophiles
Ancestral cell
populations
Cyanobacteria
Domain Bacteria
Proteobacteria
Figure A tangled web of life (part 2: archaea and bacteria)
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

95. A B D B D C C C B D A A (a) (b) (c) Figure 20.UN01
Figure 20.UN01 Concept check 20.1, p. 399
(a)
(b)
(c)
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

96. Reptiles (including birds) OTHER TETRAPODS †Dimetrodon †Cynodonts
Figure 20.UN02
Reptiles
(including birds)
OTHER
TETRAPODS
†Dimetrodon
†Cynodonts
Figure 20.UN02 Concept check 20.3, p. 406
Mammals
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

97. Figure 20.UN03-1
Figure 20.UN03-1 Skills exercise: using protein sequence data to test an evolutionary hypothesis (part 1)
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

98. Figure 20.UN03-2
Figure 20.UN03-2 Skills exercise: using protein sequence data to test an evolutionary hypothesis (part 2)
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

99. Branch point Taxon A Most recent common ancestor Taxon B Sister taxa
Figure 20.UN04
Branch point
Taxon A
Most recent
common
ancestor
Taxon B
Sister taxa
Taxon C
Taxon D
Taxon E
Figure 20.UN04 Summary of key concepts: evolutionary relationships
Polytomy
Taxon F
Taxon G
Basal taxon
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

100. Monophyletic group Polyphyletic group A A A B B B C C C D D D E E E F
Figure 20.UN05
Monophyletic group
Polyphyletic group A A A B B B C C C D D D E E E
Figure 20.UN05 Summary of key concepts: shared characters F F F G G G
Paraphyletic group
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

101. Salamander Lizard Goat Human Figure 20.UN06
Figure 20.UN06 Test your understanding, question 5 (interpreting a tree)
Human
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

102. Figure 20.UN07 Test your understanding, question 8 (drawing a tree)
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.

103. Figure 20.UN08
Figure 20.UN08 Test your understanding, question 11 (West Indian manatee)
© 2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.