1. DOD (Def Sec & SANDF) 3rd Quarterly Performance Report for FY2012/13
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Defence
and Military Veterans (PCD&MV)
13 March 2013

2. AIM
Information Brief on the Department of Defence (Def Sec & SANDF) 3rd Quarterly Performance Report for the FY2012/13
RESTRICTED

3. SCOPE Legislative Requirements
Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
RESTRICTED

4. LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS
In terms of Section 38(1) (a) (i) and (ii), of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA), Act 1 of 1999 as amended, the “Accounting Officer for a department must ensure that the department has and maintains effective, efficient and transparent systems of financial and risk management and internal control; and a system of internal audit under the control and direction of an audit committee”.
The Treasury Regulations, par states that, “the accounting officer of an institution must establish procedures for quarterly reporting to the executive authority to facilitate effective performance monitoring, evaluation and corrective action.”
The Framework for Strategic Plans and Annual Performance Plans, states that the quarterly report “provides the Accounting Officer with an opportunity to indicate measures that will be taken to ensure that implementation of the Annual Performance Plan remains on track” and that quarterly reports must be submitted to the National Treasury and the Auditor-General for auditing purposes.
RESTRICTED

5. Appendix A: Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Red – high risk / certainty (major action is required)
Amber – moderate risk (remedial/corrective action required)
Green – low risk / on course (No major action is required)
Note: “-” in tables indicates no quarterly targets published in APP
RESTRICTED 5

6. DEFENCE SECRETERIAT
RESTRICTED 6

7. OVERVIEW OF THE DEFENCE SECRETERIAT
The Def Sec consists of the following Sub-Programmes:
Departmental Direction
Government Information Technology Officer (GITO)
Policy and Planning (Defence Policy, Strategy and Planning)
Financial Services
Acquisition Services (Defence Matériel)
Defence Supply Chain Integration
Defence International Affairs
RESTRICTED 7

8. Summary of Quarterly Performance TargetsSN
Performance Indicator
Annual Target
1st Quarter Target as per APP Apr – Jun 12
1st Quarter Actual output – validated
2nd Quarter Target as per APP Jul – Sep 12
2nd Quarter Actual output – validated
3rd Quarter Target as per APP Oct – Dec 12
3rd Quarter Actual output – validated
4th Quarter Target as per APP Jan – Mar 13
4th Quarter Actual output – validated
Overall progress of indicator
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OFFICER (GITO) 1
Percentage (%) compliance with the six DOD ICT Portfolios of the Defence Enterprise Information Systems Master Plan. 1
100% 5%
1.57%
15%
8.86%
25%
41.69%
55%
Green 2
Promulgated Department of Defence Information Strategy. 2
Monitor & Review
Monitor
Monitored 3
Promulgated Information and Communicating System Policy Development plan.
1 SANDF (CMIS) is responsible for Indicator and target and will report accordingly.
2 A promulgated Department of Defence Information Strategy must be in place to guide the department and the Department of Defence Information and Communication Technology Strategy to enable Information to realise as a strategic resource. Continuous scanning of the external environment is done to determine the validity of the Department of Defence Information Strategy and will indicate when it should be revised and tabled for promulgation.
RESTRICTED 8

9. Summary of Quarterly Performance TargetsSN
Performance Indicator
Annual Target
1st Quarter Target as per APP Apr – Jun 12
1st Quarter Actual output – validated
2nd Quarter Target as per APP Jul – Sep 12
2nd Quarter Actual output – validated
3rd Quarter Target as per APP Oct – Dec 12
3rd Quarter Actual output – validated
4th Quarter Target as per APP Jan – Mar 13
4th Quarter Actual output – validated
Overall progress of indicator
DEFENCE POLICY, STRATEGY AND PLANNING (DPSP) 4
Co-ordinated Defence engagement in clusters
Cluster related submissions by defined target dates
Cluster related submissions in this quarter by defined targets dates
Cluster related activities were successfully done by defined target dates
Green 5
Support and Resource the Defence Review Process
HR requirements are met at 100% according to client’s demand
HR requirements have been met at 100% according to client’s demand.
NilHR requirements have been met at 100% according to client’s demand.
Nil 6
% Departmental policies authorised for promulgation
70%
50%
100%
0%3
Red 7
Tabling of DOD (Def Sec & SANDF) APP in Parliament in line with the national prescripts on planning
Tabled by February 2013
Develop DOD draft APP
Draft Def Sec APP for FY2013/14 developed
Submit 1st draft DOD APP to NT and AG
1st draft Def Sec APP for 2013 was submitted to NT and Presidency on 31 August 2012 in line with national prescripts on planning.
Submit 2nd draft DOD APP to NT and AG
2nd draft Def Sec and SANDF APP for 2013 was submitted to NT and Presidency on 30 Nov 12 and 3 Dec 12 in line with national prescripts on planning.
Table DOD APP in Parliament
RESTRICTED 9 9
3 Ten (10) Policies at the office of the C SANDF awaiting approval.

10. Summary of Quarterly Performance TargetsSN
Performance Indicator
Annual Target
1st Quarter Target as per APP Apr – Jun 12
1st Quarter Actual output – validated
2nd Quarter Target as per APP Jul – Sep 12
2nd Quarter Actual output – validated
3rd Quarter Target as per APP Oct – Dec 12
3rd Quarter Actual output – validated
4th Quarter Target as per APP Jan – Mar 13
4th Quarter Actual output – validated
Overall progress of indicator
DEFENCE POLICY, STRATEGY AND PLANNING (DPSP) (cont) 8
DOD enterprise risk management maturity level status
Level 4 -
Green 9
Tabling of the DOD Annual Report in Parliament in line with national prescripts
Tabled by 31 August 2012
Submit by 15 August 4
The DOD Annual Report for FY2011/12 was tabled in Parliament on 28 September 2012 in line with national prescripts. 10
DOD research capability status
Organisational structure design investigation conducted
Strategic analysis and business process concluded
Not achieved
Finalisation of the investigation report
Submitted for approval
Not achieved5
Approved structure
Red
4 AG Report only received end of August by AGSA – automatic extension of target date by one month as per policy.
5 The further development of the DOD Policy Research capability is on hold until the employees critical to the development of the capability are released from their responsibility to the Defence Review process.
RESTRICTED 10

11. Summary of Quarterly Performance TargetsSN
Performance Indicator
Annual Target
1st Quarter Target as per APP Apr – Jun 12
1st Quarter Actual output – validated
2nd Quarter Target as per APP Jul – Sep 12
2nd Quarter Actual output – validated
3rd Quarter Target as per APP Oct – Dec 12
3rd Quarter Actual output – validated
4th Quarter Target as per APP Jan – Mar 13
4th Quarter Actual output – validated
Overall progress of indicator
FINANCIAL SERVICES 11
Number of adverse audit findings
Green 12
Approved DOD policy regulating resource unit costing
Approved Policy
Conceptualisation
Development of Draft Strategy
A chapter has been included in the Budget Preparations Policy which is due for promulgation in December 2012.
Stakeholder consultation
A chapter has been included in Budget Preparation Policy which is due for promulgation in June 2013
Policy Approved 13
Defence fiscal Framework status
Review of Defence fiscal framework in line with Defence strategy -
Defence fiscal framework reviewed in line with Defence strategy
Amber 14
Percentage (%) payments in accordance with invoices/claims/ charges etc
100%
70%
80%
79%
RESTRICTED 11

12. Summary of Quarterly Performance TargetsSN
Performance Indicator
Annual Target
1st Quarter Target as per APP Apr – Jun 12
1st Quarter Actual output – validated
2nd Quarter Target as per APP Jul – Sep 12
2nd Quarter Actual output – validated
3rd Quarter Target as per APP Oct – Dec 12
3rd Quarter Actual output – validated
4th Quarter Target as per APP Jan – Mar 13
4th Quarter Actual output – validated
Overall progress of indicator
ACQUISITION SERVICES (DEFENCE MATÉRIEL) 15
Strategy of Defence Industry Status
Approved White Paper on Defence Industry -
Waiting for the approval of the Defence Review and guidance from the Chairperson of the SA Defence Industry Council
Sec Def' authority was obtained to draft the 1st Draft SA Defence Industry Strategy by 01 April 2013
Approved
Amber 16
Percentage (%) budget allocation received for renewal of the DOD main equipment in relation to the total DOD vote
30%6
9,49% as at 01 Apr 127
9,49% as at 01 Apr 12
30%
Red 17
Percentage (%) DOD expenditure on research and development (in relation to the total DOD vote)
25%8
14% as on 01 Apr 129
14% as on 01 Apr 12
25%
6 The White Paper on the South African Defence Related Industries, December 1999, states inter alia that one of the initiatives launched to sustain strategic technologies and capabilities was to increase the capital equipment replacement to approximately 30% by 2001.
7 Comparison between DOD Budget Vote and Def Mat Div (SCAMP: Capital SDA+SDP) Budget Vote – Not including SDA rollovers and maintenance & support at Services & Divisions.
8 Based on international best practice and benched marked with BRICSA countries.
9 Comparison between Def Mat Div (SCAMP: Capital SDA+SDP) Budget Vote and Technology Development Budget Vote.
RESTRICTED 12

13. Summary of Quarterly Performance TargetsSN
Performance Indicator
Annual Target
1st Quarter Target as per APP Apr – Jun 12
1st Quarter Actual output – validated
2nd Quarter Target as per APP Jul – Sep 12
2nd Quarter Actual output – validated
3rd Quarter Target as per APP Oct – Dec 12
3rd Quarter Actual output – validated
4th Quarter Target as per APP Jan – Mar 13
4th Quarter Actual output – validated
Overall progress of indicator
ACQUISITION SERVICES (DEFENCE MATÉRIEL) (cont) 18
Approval of Defence Intangible Capital Assets (ICA) policy
Approval, ratification and roll out of Defence ICA Management policy
Discuss policy requirements with relevant stakeholders
Discussed policy requirements with relevant stakeholders. Developed Draft Policy and awaiting inputs from SA Army and CMIS.
Obtain first draft inputs for the policy
Busy with 3rd Draft Policy
Obtain second draft inputs for the policy
Policy completed and ready for approval
Consolidate all inputs and prepare for policy approval process
Green
DEFENCE SUPPLY CHAIN INTEGRATION 19
White Paper on Defence Industry Status
Approved White Paper on Defence Industry
Finalised draft and approval process
Draft White Paper on Defence Industry
Discussion Document
Consultation with stakeholders
Draft White Paper on Defence Industry available and consultation has taken place.
Development phase 20
Percentage reduction in non compliance with supply chain regulatory framework
4%10 1%
10 The annual target of 4% contains development of a policy on GRC, improvement on supply chain monitoring systems, and successful mitigation of risks. It is believed that non-compliance will be reduced by 4% should all these mechanisms are put in place
RESTRICTED 13

14. Summary of Quarterly Performance TargetsSN
Performance Indicator
Annual Target
1st Quarter Target as per APP Apr – Jun 12
1st Quarter Actual output – validated
2nd Quarter Target as per APP Jul – Sep 12
2nd Quarter Actual output – validated
3rd Quarter Target as per APP Oct – Dec 12
3rd Quarter Actual output – validated
4th Quarter Target as per APP Jan – Mar 13
4th Quarter Actual output – validated
Overall progress of indicator
DEFENCE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS 21
Percentage (%) Compliance with AU and UN Requirements Rules and Regulations for peace missions
100% -
Green 22
Percentage (%) MOU Compliance with agreed force level for deployment in UN Missions
85% 23
Percentage (%) compliance with outputs of diplomatic missions in line with SA foreign policy
75% 24
DOD Foreign Relations strategy status
Policy Approved
Submit policy to stakeholders for inputs.
Waiting for appropriate slot to brief the Command Bodies of DOD.
Present Policy to senior officers for advice.
Not Achieved
Present Policy to senior officers for approval.
Presented to some of the Command Bodies
Policy approved.
Amber 25
% of positions filled against allocated quota for international institutions
20%
RESTRICTED 14

15. Summary of Quarterly Performance TargetsSN
Performance Indicator
Annual Target
1st Quarter Target as per APP Apr – Jun 12
1st Quarter Actual output – validated
2nd Quarter Target as per APP Jul – Sep 12
2nd Quarter Actual output – validated
3rd Quarter Target as per APP Oct – Dec 12
3rd Quarter Actual output – validated
4th Quarter Target as per APP Jan – Mar 13
4th Quarter Actual output – validated
Overall progress of indicator
HUMAN RESOURCE SUPPORT SERVICES 26
Percentage of PSAP Disciplinary Cases Finalised Within 120 Days in the DOD.
40% -
Green 27
Number of National Youth Service Programme (NYSP) participants trained per year.
2000 28
Number of the MSDS members in the system per year
6673 29
Defence Force Service Commission Status
Fully Functional and recommendations submitted to the MOD&MV
Fully Functional
Established offices in SAMHS.
Office infrastructure is now 90% complete.
Office infrastructure is now 99% complete
(internet connection only remaining issue)
Amber 30
Human Resource Development Strategy and Plan status.
Strategy Piloted
Piloting of Strategy
Piloting of Strategy 25% completed.
Piloting of Strategy 50% completed.
Piloting of Strategy 75% Completed.
RESTRICTED 15

16. Summary of Quarterly Performance TargetsSN
Performance Indicator
Annual Target
1st Quarter Target as per APP Apr – Jun 12
1st Quarter Actual output – validated
2nd Quarter Target as per APP Jul – Sep 12
2nd Quarter Actual output – validated
3rd Quarter Target as per APP Oct – Dec 12
3rd Quarter Actual output – validated
4th Quarter Target as per APP Jan – Mar 13
4th Quarter Actual output – validated
Overall progress of indicator
HUMAN RESOURCE SUPPORT SERVICES (cont) 31
Armed Forces Day Policy Framework
Approved
Conduct Research
Research conducted
Develop Draft
Developed a draft framework.
Consult Draft Document
Draft Document Consulted.
Obtain Approval
Green 32
Percentage of DOD collective grievances and disputes resolved.
80% - 33
DOD HR Retention Strategy status.
Strategy Approved 34
DOD HR Performance Management System status.
1 new comprehensive system implemented and monitored
1 new comprehensive system implemented 35
Percentage compliance with annual submission and recording of SMS financial disclosures.
95% 36
Level of morale within the Def Sec. ≥3
RESTRICTED 16

17. Summary of Quarterly Performance TargetsSN
Performance Indicator
Annual Target
1st Quarter Target as per APP Apr – Jun 12
1st Quarter Actual output – validated
2nd Quarter Target as per APP Jul – Sep 12
2nd Quarter Actual output – validated
3rd Quarter Target as per APP Oct – Dec 12
3rd Quarter Actual output – validated
4th Quarter Target as per APP Jan – Mar 13
4th Quarter Actual output – validated
Overall progress of indicator
LEGAL SERVICES 37
% litigation settled in favour of the DOD.
100% -
Green
OFFICE OF THE MILITARY OMBUD 38
Office of the Military Ombud status
Establishment of the Military Ombud office
Established the Military Ombud office
Established the Military Ombud office.
Office Established
RESTRICTED 17

18. SANDF
RESTRICTED 18

19. OVERVIEW OF THE SANDF
The outputs, performance measures and targets of the Enablement and Service Delivery Programmes (Programmes 2 - 8) reflect the core outputs of the SANDF. These programme are as follows:
2 - Force Employment
3 - Landward Defence
4 - Air Defence
5 - Maritime Defence
6 - Military Health Support
7 - Defence Intelligence
8 - General Support
It must be noted that although the quarterly report serves to account for performance against the unclassified SANDF APP, some of the information provided to describe the reasons for deviation are sensitive.
RESTRICTED 19

20. SANDF STRATEGIC OUTCOMES AND OUTPUTS Performance Indicator
Prepare Mission-ready Capabilities
Performance Indicator
Target
12/13
Responsible
Quarter Achievement
YTD Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Output 1: Prepare forces as stipulated in the Joint Force Employment Requirement
Activity 1.2: Ensure Combat-ready Defence Capabilities
Broader DOD Health/Fitness Status
Positive trend
Surgeon General
Negative
Trend of deployable status on concurrent health assessments (CHA)
Positive
% of approved Capital Works Plan Projects completed as scheduled per year
100
Chief Logistics4
100 (0)
% compliance with DOD Refurbishment Programme annual schedule 65
Chief Logistics5
100 (24.14)
100 (34.48)
37.93
Activity 1.3: Ensure Matériel to satisfy the requirements of the SANDF
Overarching Logistic Strategy
Approved
Chief Logistics 15 20 25
4 and 5. Incorrect reporting during the first two quarters
CONFIDENTIAL 20

21. SANDF STRATEGIC OUTCOMES AND OUTPUTS
Execute Ordered Commitments
Performance Indicator
Target
12/13
Responsible
Quarter Achievement
YTD Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Output 2.1: Border Safeguarding
Number of landward sub-units deployed 11
Force Employment
Output 2.2: Regional Security
% compliance with force levels for external operations 96
99.5
98.8
95.6
97.6
% compliance with serviceability of equipment for external operations
675 67 -
% of the value of claims reimbursed by the UN/AU
756
92.58
72.41
82.50
Activity 1: Employ the SANDF
Number of internal operations 4
Number of external operations
5 and 6. No verification reports received from UN.
CONFIDENTIAL 21

22. SANDF STRATEGIC OUTCOMES AND OUTPUTS
Provide Defence and Strategic Direction
Performance Indicator
Target
12/13
Responsible
Quarter Achievement
YTD Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Activity 1: Administer the DOD (Direction)
Total number of Defence attaché offices 40
DFR 39
CONFIDENTIAL 22

23. SANDF STRATEGIC OUTCOMES AND OUTPUTS
Compliance with the Regulatory Framework
Performance Indicator
Target
12/13
Responsible
Quarter Achievement
YTD Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Activity 1: Administer the DOD (Control)
% increase in military court docket readiness rate 14
CDLS
100
% reduction in military court case backlogs 15 20
18.33
% of disciplinary cases in the DOD finalised within 120 days as per SANDF Order 40 32 36 48
38.67
% litigation settled in favour of the DOD 60
12.5
15.6
14.37
CONFIDENTIAL 23

24. SANDF STRATEGIC OUTCOMES AND OUTPUTS
Strategic Outputs and Annual Targets for MTSF Outcome 2
SANDF Outputs
Performance Indicator
Target
12/13
Responsible
Quarter Achievement
YTD Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Mission-ready defence capabilities
Trend of broader SANDF health/fitness status
Positive
Surgeon General
Negative
Ordered defence commitments
Trend of deployable status on concurrent health assessments
Number of internal operations
Targets depend on resource allocation
Force Employment 4
CONFIDENTIAL 24

25. SANDF STRATEGIC OUTCOMES AND OUTPUTS
Strategic Outputs and Annual Targets for MTSF Outcome 3
SANDF Outputs
Performance Indicator
Target
12/13
Responsible
Quarter Achievement
YTD Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Ordered Defence Commitments
Number of internal operations 4
Force Employment
CONFIDENTIAL 25

26. SANDF STRATEGIC OUTCOMES AND OUTPUTS
Outputs and Annual Targets for MTSF Outcome 5
SANDF Outputs
Performance Indicator
Target
12/13
Responsible
Quarter Achievement
YTD Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Military direction
% compliance with DOD training targets (non- combat professional military development)
100
Human Resources 99 87 70 85
% compliance with DOD training targets (re-skilling) 72
% compliance with DOD training targets (National Youth Service)
48.65
96.70
145
CONFIDENTIAL 26

27. SANDF STRATEGIC OUTCOMES AND OUTPUTS
Strategic Outputs and Annual Targets for MTSF Outcome 11
SANDF Outputs
Performance Indicator
Target
12/13
Responsible
Quarter Achievement
YTD Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Defence direction
Approved force design
Approved
CCS (MPSPO)
In progress
Approved force structure
Total number of defence attaché offices 40
DFR 39
Ordered defence commitments
% compliance with force levels for external operations 96
J Ops
99.5
98.8
95.6
97.6
% compliance with serviceability of equipment for external operations 67 -
% of the value of claims reimbursed by the UN/AU 75
(DefSec) FMD
92.58
72.41
82.50
DOD Morale
Level of DOD morale
Positive
Def Insp
Ongoing
CONFIDENTIAL 27

28. THANK YOU
RESTRICTED 28