1. Argyris Kahros
Market Infrastructure Expert European Central Bank
Discussion on ‘Liquidity Coverage Ratio in a payments network’ Richard Heuver and Ron Berndsen
15th Payment and Settlement System Simulation Seminar
August 31 – September 1, 2017
Helsinki, Finland

2. What are the authors attempting to do?
Apply the idea of the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) from the Basel III framework to a payment system network.
Calculate liquidity buffers for large financial institutions based on the LCR framework, using LVPS transaction-level data.
Investigate the effects on a payment system network of a large financial institution not appropriately meetings its LCR.
Monitor the spread of contagion from the imposed initial liquidity shortfall.
In addition to being too big to fail can banks also be too connected to fail?
Discussion on 'Liquidity Coverage Ratio in a payments network'

3. How do the authors do it?
Calculate liquidity buffers for large banks based on net incoming/outgoing payments over a 30-day period using LCR equals 1 + α.
For one bank, induce a liquidity shortfall by decreasing the liquidity buffer, and thus that bank’s LCR.
As payments flow, the liquidity shortfall generated by a single bank will reduce its ability to meet outgoing obligations, thereby creating liquidity shortfalls in other banks.
The spread is quantified by monitoring the change in LCR for all banks and when LCR<1, this bank is labelled as stressed.
Discussion on 'Liquidity Coverage Ratio in a payments network'

4. What do the authors find?
Magnitude of liquidity shortfall is the most important factor.
Liquidity above that associated with LCR=1 (i.e. α) quickly deteriorates.
Large banks inflict the most damage.
Ability to identify nodes (i.e. banks) that are most efficient at instigating a stress cascade.
Discussion on 'Liquidity Coverage Ratio in a payments network'

5. Discussion …
vs.
Discussion on 'Liquidity Coverage Ratio in a payments network'