Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Non-Invasive Head-Holder for Neurosurgical Procedures

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Non-Invasive Head-Holder for Neurosurgical Procedures"— Presentation transcript:

1 Non-Invasive Head-Holder for Neurosurgical Procedures
Sponsor: Dr. Jacob Joseph University of Michigan Hospital Department of Neurosurgery Section Instructor: Professor Jeffrey Stein University of Michigan Mechanical Engineering ME 450 Team #18 Jessica Deese, Anne Gu, Syeda Maisa, Jane Modes Problem The Mayfield Skull Clamp has been the standard device for affixing a patient’s head in place during neurosurgery for the past 70 years [1]. Although the Mayfield can hold the head rigidly, it does so by driving three pins into the skull. Because of this invasive method of fixation, many problems arise such as skull fractures, lacerations of the scalp, and air embolisms [2]. Final Design Validation Quick and Simple Setup Accommodations for Emergency Procedures Range of Applicable force Providing Stability 2 hour test with cadaver head 7 hour test with model head Note Additional testing must be performed to increase sample size VALIDATION User requirements satisfied by design are breathing tube access, avoid pressure on eyes, and access for neural monitoring. User requirements satisfied by key features are non-invasive fixation, patient adjustability, and accommodate emergency procedures. Validation details (testing protocol, results) and design critique/future work. Photos and graphs/analysis from your testing belong on this panel Conclusion Setup time is < 2 min Preliminary trend indicates faster setup timing with practice Conclusion Setup time is << 3 mins and thus the rest of the time could be allotted to turning of the patient for CPR Key Features Pressure Applicator Headband Headband Mayfield Device Non-invasive fixation Patient adjustability Project Scope To address these problems, we are designing a non-invasive head- holder device for spinal surgeries where patients are in the prone position. Our device is trying to bridge the gap between devices that are non-invasive but apply pressure on the eyes (DORO) and devices that avoid pressure on the eyes but are invasive (Mayfield). Conclusion Minimum force .45*6=2.75 (lb. force) Maximum force 15*6=90 (lb. force) One turn = (.45 lb. force) Headband Frame with 6 Threaded Holes Quick Release Mechanism Quick Release Mechanism Attachment to Table Mount Attachment to Table Mount Accommodates emergency procedures Uses existing solution to keep cost low Prone Position DORO Headrest Design Critique / Future Plans Change shape of the screw cap to allow for easier turning Develop system to turn all PA’s at once Add sensors for detecting pressure to optimize surgical process Convert 3D printed mate to metal mate for durability Disposable PA padding User Requirements Specifications FUTURE WORK Talk about design critique Provide Stability Supports a mass of kg [3] Patient movement in any direction produced by surgical load ≤ 12.7 mm [3] Non-Invasive Class I non-invasive level [4] Accommodate emergency procedures Detach device from bed fixture and turn patient in ≤ 3 minutes [5] Quick and Simple Setup Average setup time ≤ 5 minutes Patient Adjustability Longitudinal head length from cm [6] Lateral head length from 13.3 – 16.5 cm [6] Breathing Tube Access Area between bottom of nose to bottom of the chin (~18.7 cm) and ear to ear (~16.5 cm) [6] Avoid Pressure on Eyes Maxillary Zone: Area between top of the eye to upper lip (~ 7.7 cm) and ear to ear (~16.5 cm) Access for Neural Monitoring Area within top circumference of head, which is 63.5 cm [6] Range of Applicable Force Apply lbs. of force Similar Analogies to Key Features Acknowledgments We like to thank the ME machine shop staff, especially Toby Donajkowski, John Hall, and Charlie Bradley, for invaluable manufacturing advice. Pressure Applicator Quick Release Mechanism Attachment to Table Mount Citations Desai, J. P., Ho, M., Simard, J. M., & Gullapalli, R. (2013). U.S. Patent No. US A1. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Rozet, I., & Vavilala, M. S. (2007). Risks and Benefits of Patient Positioning During Neurosurgical Care. Anesthesiology Clinics, 25(3), 631–653. Continuum Mechanics - Elasticity. (n.d.). Retrieved October 29, 2016, from Courses/En221/Notes/Elasticity/Elasticity.htm Classification of Medical Devies." Austrailian Medical Devices Guidance Document 25 (2005): n. pag. Omnex.com. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Godds Administration. Web. 30 Oct < iso13485/australia/Australia-Device-Classification-Guidelines.pdf>. "Brain Injury Foundation." Brain Injury Foundation. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Oct < Static adult human physical characteristics of the adult head, from pages of Poston, Alan. (April 2000) Department of Defense Human Factors Engineering Technical Advisory Group (DOD HFE TAG). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Bike seat adjustment mechanism C-Clamp


Download ppt "Non-Invasive Head-Holder for Neurosurgical Procedures"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google