1. WP6. Quality Plan
6.2 Develop a monitoring, evaluation, and quality plan
Edited by
September, 2017

2. Lead Organisation: Split Co-Lead: AUA, CRE.THI.DEV
Participating Organisation: All partners

3. Project Quality Management
Tasks – deliverables:
6.1 Establish the Quality Committee
6.2 Develop a monitoring, evaluation, and quality plan
6.3 Progress reports
6.4 Hire External Monitor

4. Project Quality Management
Quality Committee establishment
Kickoff meeting (February 2017) decision:

5. Project Quality Management
Tasks – deliverables:
6.1 Establish the Quality Committee
6.2 Develop a monitoring, evaluation, and quality plan
6.3 Progress reports
6.4 Hire External Monitor

6. 6.2 Develop a Monitoring, Evaluation, & Quality Plan

7. Project Quality Management
The quality plan contains the milestones of the project as well as the means and the indicators for the evaluation of the project progress and project’s results. It is the roadmap for the evaluation of the quality of the project.
For internal use by the project team and will act as a guide for the internal quality management of the Project.

8. Quality Plan Aims and Objectives
To clearly define the content, format, review and approval process of the project deliverables
To define the responsibilities of the project partners regarding those deliverables
To identify all the different tools and means to be applied throughout the project duration
To provide guidelines for adequate implementation and thereby assure that certain quality standards in the performance of our tasks are fulfilled.
To define the quality requirements that must be obtained throughout the project lifecycle, those that the deliverables, actions and results must conform to.

9. Quality Plan Objectives
To define:
Content
Format
Review and approval process
1. PROJECT DELIVERABLES’
2. RESPONSIBILITIES of the project partners
3. THE QUALITY REQUIREMENTS for DELIVERABLES, ACTIONS AND RESULTS
4. THE DIFFERENT TOOLS AND MEANS for the achievement of the requirements
To assure that certain quality standards in the performance of our tasks are fulfilled.

10. Project Quality Assurance
Through the monitoring and evaluation of the quality of the
Project Deliverables
Project Processes

11. Project Quality Assurance
Quality of the project processes
Questionnaire with an assessment of the performance of the consortium and of the current state of the partnership
Internal evaluation
Every 18 months: Next evaluation April 2018
Online survey, with the participation of all
Satisfaction survey with threshold of approval:
More than 70% of weighted answers with score ≥ 3.

12. Quality of Project Deliverables
Quality of the project deliverables
For every key FoodQA deliverable, consisting of the results of the Work Packages, there is a monitoring/evaluation process and relevant quantified quality indicators
Deliverables categorisation:
Tangible : Documents, etc
Intangible : Meetings/Events
Other Intangible : Websites, platforms etc

13. Quality of the project deliverables
Tangible or document deliverables undergo a peer review process of evaluation by nominated reviewer(s), internal or external.
Internal review/evaluation process for document deliverables
Some deliverables, such as the E-book (WP1) , the training courses (WP2) will also be validated by external stakeholders.
Author submits "draft" deliverable to WPL
WPL forwards draft deliverable to reviewer(s)
Reviewer(s) evaluate(s) deliverable and sends evaluation to author & WPL
Author accepts/rejects suggestions, makes changes, returns deliverable and eval. to WPL
WPL gives final approval

14. Quality of the project deliverables
Internal review evaluations should include the following information:
General comments:
Thoroughness of contents
Correspondence to project objectives
Specific comments:
Relevance
Format (layout, spelling, etc.)
Suggested actions:
Changes that should be implemented
Missing information
Further improvements

15. Quality of the project deliverables
Meeting and event evaluations
Internal evaluation – after the implementation of a meeting or event
Meetings: Meeting Evaluation Questionnaire, circulated by the QM in online form
Events: Event Evaluation Questionnaire, by all partners, paper form, translated in all languages. Results tabulated sent to the QM for analysis.
Both are satisfaction surveys, with threshold of approval:
More than 70% of weighted answers with score ≥ 3.

16. Quality of the project deliverables
Training Evaluation Questionnaire
after the end of the trainings/seminars
using hardcopies of the standard document
More than 70% of weighted answers with score ≥ 3.

17. Quality of the project deliverables
Other intangible deliverables such as:
- the e-library and
- the FoodQA web portal,
will be evaluated, with a focus on the overall quality of the deliverable and
the usability and the added value to the final users.

18. Project Quality Management
Tasks – deliverables:
6.1 Establish the Quality Committee
6.2 Develop a monitoring, evaluation, and quality plan
6.3 Progress reports
6.4 Hire External Monitor
Presentation by Prof. Fahmi Abu Al Rub

19. Lina Tsakalou CRETHIDEV
Thank you for your time!
Lina Tsakalou
CRETHIDEV