Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byChristopher Booker Modified over 6 years ago
1
Nosocomial Invasive Group A Streptococcal Infections
Nick Daneman PGY-2, Internal Medicine, University of Toronto
2
Presentation Overview
brief background literature objectives and methods results and discussion nosocomial vs non-nosocomial invasive GAS infections heterogeneous nosocomial categories post-surgical infections peripartum infections other nosocomial GAS infections factors influencing mortality cross-transmission conclusions
3
Invasive Group A Streptococcal Infections
resurgence in invasive Group A Streptococcal (GAS) infections in last 2 decades prompted numerous large hospital-based and population-based case series
4
Invasive GAS Infections: Case Series
>40 large case series of invasive GAS infections since 1985 significant proportion of cases have been nosocomial range: 5.4 to 39% median: 13.5% no analysis of nosocomial subgroup
5
Nosocomial Outbreaks literature confined to retrospective reports of outbreaks 51 outbreaks described wide array of clinical settings surgery, peripartum, burn units, ICU, … large numbers of patients involved range 2 to 25 mean 9 health care workers as carriers sites of colonization (pharyngeal, nasal, anal, vaginal)
6
after single case identified:
CDC Recommendations for Prevention of Invasive GAS Disease among Postpartum and Surgical Patients CID Oct. 2002 after single case identified: enhanced surveillance storage of GAS isolates from index patient and any additional cases after second case identified: epidemiologic links sought microbiologic links determined culture specimens obtained from health care workers
7
Objectives 1) to provide the first prospective description of invasive nosocomial group A streptococcal infections 2) to evaluate the risk of cross-transmission within the hospital setting
8
Methods: Data Collection
prospective, population based surveillance Ontario January, to Dec all 155 hospital laboratories largest outpatient laboratory annual audits of sterile site cultures
9
Definitions invasive group A streptococcal (GAS) infection
isolation of GAS from a normally sterile body site nosocomial infection disease neither present nor incubating at the time of admission surgical site infection (NNIS definition) occurring within 30d of operation, or within 1 year if implanted material
10
Definitions peripartum GAS infections outbreak
all nosocomial unless signs or symptoms of disease evident prior to delivery outbreak 2 or more cases of disease linked by epidemiologic and microbiologic investigations
11
Microbiologic/Laboratory Methods
M - protein, T-agglutination typing at National Centre for Streptococcus in Edmonton, Alberta pulse field gel electrophoresis used to evaluate epidemiologically associated cases
12
Statistical Analysis surveillance data double-entered, stored, sorted and analyzed via SAS statistical software differences in group proportions analyzed by chi-square/Fisher’s two-tailed test differences in group means analyzed by Student’s t-test
13
Results nosocomial vs non-nosocomial invasive GAS infections
heterogeneous nosocomial categories post-surgical infections peripartum infections other nosocomial GAS infections factors influencing mortality cross-transmission
14
Invasive GAS Infections Ontario (1992 – 2000)
15
Nosocomial vs. Non-Nosocomial GAS infections
Chi-sq /Ttest Sex (%M) 36.9% 54.0% p<0.001 Age -children <17 -adults -elderly >65 7.6% 60.5% 31.9% 21.5% 48.2% 30.4% Underlying Illness 42.2% 40.4% p=0.554 Chicken Pox 0.0% 4.8%
16
Nosocomial vs. Non-Nosocomial GAS infections
Chi-sq /Ttest Necrotizing Fasciitis (NF) 5.7% 11.8% p<0.001 Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome (STSS) 7.7% 13.7% p=0.004 Mtype 1 or 3 22.2% 35.5%
17
Nosocomial vs. Non-Nosocomial GAS infections
Chi-sq /Ttest Requiring Surgical Intervention 25.4% 38.0% p<0.001 ICU admission 21.5% 27.8% p=0.029 Mortality at 30 days 16.2% 15.1% p=0.640
18
Nosocomial Categories
Post-surgical 95 cases Peripartum 86 cases Other 109 cases
19
Post-Surgical Invasive GAS Infection
20
Post-surgical Invasive GAS infection
post-surgical invasive GAS infections 95 cases 4.5% of all invasive GAS infections 3 fold higher rate than estimated by CDC total surgeries in Ontario 9,078, 303 1/100,000 surgeries
21
Types of Surgeries digestive system (27.6%)
musculoskeletal system (23.7%) nervous system (10.5%) cardiovascular system (9.2%) integumentary system (9.3%) female genital system (5.3%) male genital, ENT, endocrine, ophthalmologic, respiratory, urinary
22
Types of Surgeries
23
Time of Onset median onset = postoperative day #5 30.9% within 2 days
timing did not significantly influence mortality
24
Distribution of Onset # Cases Postoperative Day
25
Microbiologic Profile
most common M-types M % M % M % M4 5.9% more M12 infections (p=0.033) less M3 infections (p=0.014)
26
Outcomes icu admission 27.6% mechanical ventilation 20.5%
30 day mortality 8.4%
27
Summary GAS is a rare but important cause of post-surgical infection
can affect any organ system both minor and major procedures wide distribution of onset
28
Peripartum Invasive GAS Infection
peripartum invasive GAS infections 86 cases 4.1% of all invasive GAS infections total live births in Ontario 1,269,722 6.8 cases /100,000 live births
29
Patient Population different gender distribution
all women different age distribution all adults less underlying illness 2.3% vs 39.8% non-nosocomial infection (p=0.001)
30
Illness Profile no necrotizing fasciitis low rate of STSS
0.0% vs. 11.7% non-nosocomial (p=0.002) low rate of STSS 2.4% vs. 13.6% non-nosocomial (p=0.015)
31
Microbiologic Profile
most common M-types M % M % M % M % more M28 (p=0.001) and M4 infections (p=0.001) less M1 (p=0.005), M3 (p=0.003) and M12 infections (p=0.034)
32
Outcomes icu admission 11.3% mechanical ventilation 1.3%
30 day mortality 1.2%
33
Comparison to other Women of Childbearing Age
Peripartum Cases Women of Childbearing Age Rate of underlying illness 2.3% 26.8% Mortality 1.2% 7.8%
34
CDC surveillance Ontario CDC 1995-2000 Number of cases 86 87
Proportion of GAS cases 4.1% 2.2% Rate/1000 live births 0.07 0.06 Mortality 1/86 3/87 #1 Mtype M28
35
Summary relatively common obstetrical problem (0.07/1000 live births)
better prognosis than all other categories of invasive GAS infection lower burden of underlying illness different microbiologic profile
36
Other Invasive GAS Infections (non-surgical, non-obstetrical)
37
Non-surgical, non-obstetrical invasive GAS infections
109 nosocomial cases were neither surgical nor peripartum this group of infections has never been characterized
38
Time of Onset time from admission to documentation of invasive GAS infection median: 10.5 days mode: 3 days 17/109 (15%) occurred after 2 mos of hospitalization ?is the organism acquired in the hospital or the community?
39
Infectious Syndromes
40
Mechanism of Soft Tissue Infection
intravascular catheterization 16 other iatrogenic interventions 6 ulcers trauma burns other recognized lesions 2 no predisposing factor 3
41
Comparative Mortality rates
Infectious Syndrome Nosocomial (non-surgical, non-peripartum) Non-Nosocomial Chi-square Primary Bacteremia 42.9% 24.2% 0.019 Soft Tissue Infection 20.6% 10.2% 0.056 Necrotizing Fasciitis 56.5% 32.9% 0.024 Respiratory 66.7% 23.9% 0.017 All Diagnoses 37.0% 15.2% 0.001
42
Comparative Mortality Rates
NF Bacteremia Soft Tissue Respiratory All Diagnoses
43
Patient Characteristics
older age 61.8 +/ yrs vs /-27.6 yrs (p<0.001) higher rate of underlying illness 76.2% vs. 40.3%
44
Microbiologic Profile
distribution similar to that of non-nosocomial invasive GAS infections most common M-types M % M % M % M % M4, M22, M % each ?is the organism acquired in the hospital or the community?
45
Summary a large group of nosocomial invasive GAS infections occur in non-surgical, non-obstetrical settings widely varied time of onset mechanisms of infection infectious syndromes poor outcome compared with non-nosocomial GAS infections older, sicker patient population
46
Factors Influencing Mortality
Post Surgical Peripartum Other All Nosocomial Categories
47
Age Category p<0.001
48
Sex
49
Delayed Antibiotic Use
50
Delayed Antibiotic Use
<24h vs. >24h 10.6% vs. 27.0% mortality (p=0.012) <48h vs. >48h 11.2% vs. 30.8% mortality (p=0.009)
51
Mortality by Nosocomial Category
p<0.001
52
Other Factors Influencing Mortality
any underlying illness OR 7.3 cardiac disease OR 6.3 kidney disease OR 19.7 malignancy OR 2.4 necrotizing fasciitis OR 5.0 STSS OR 10.4 M1 or M3
53
Cross-Transmission temporal clustering prevalence of true outbreaks
comparison of sporadic and outbreak linked cases size of outbreaks a target for intervention
54
Temporal Clustering of Nosocomial Invasive GAS infections
given one nosocomial invasive GAS infection, the probability of an ensuing infection within the same hospital: within 1 week 4.0% within 1 month 6.5% within 3 months % within 6 months % within 12 months %
55
Likelihood of True Epidemiologic/Microbiologic Linkage
probability that paired cases within same hospital are truly linked (by epidemiologic/microbiologic workup) <1 week % 1 week- 1 month 14.3% 1-3 months 0% 3-6 months 0% 6-12 months 0%
56
Nosocomial Invasive GAS Infections Involved in Outbreaks
57
Comparison of Sporadic and Outbreak-linked Cases
no significant differences in patient characteristics (age, sex, illness) nosocomial category presence of necrotizing fasciitis presence of STSS icu admissions mortality
58
Magnitude of Outbreaks
reported nosocomial outbreaks are large mean 9 patients several outbreaks involving more than 10 pts e.g. Mastro et al., NEJM Oct.4, 1990 20 post-surgical invasive GAS infections 3 year period ( ) 9/9 samples tested: M-NT, T28 linked to operating room technician with psoriatic scalp lesions
59
Magnitude of Outbreaks
in our study, “outbreaks” very small: 15 involve only 2 cases 4 involve > 2 cases 0 involve >5 cases why smaller outbreaks? modern infection control practices literature bias towards dramatic outbreaks
60
A Target for Intervention
most outbreaks involve only 2 cases greatest yield = preventing the second case widespread investigations and chemoprophylaxis not economically feasible target cases at high risk of secondary nosocomial transmission
61
A Target for Intervention?
62
High Risk for Transmission: NF in the ICU
4 community-acquired invasive GAS infections caused secondary nosocomial transmission 4/2032 (0.2%) 3 involved NF in ICU setting 3/136 (2.2%) 1 did not involve NF or ICU setting 1/1975 (0.05%) (p<0.001)
63
Summary unrelated nosocomial invasive GAS infections are frequently clustered in time & space substantial likelihood of 2 cases being causally linked if they occur within 1 month investigators must think laterally index and secondary cases linked to invasive and non-invasive cases linked to nosocomial and community acquired cases similar characteristics to sporadic cases outbreaks usually limited to 2 cases potential benefit to isolation and prophylaxis when necrotizing fasciitis case admitted to icu
64
Conclusions first descriptive analysis of nosocomial invasive GAS infections differ from non-nosocomial infections heterogeneous group post surgical infections diverse surgeries and time of onset peripartum infections common, excellent prognosis non-surgical, non-obstetrical infections varied onset, syndromes, mechanism of infection poor prognosis
65
Conclusions nosocomial outbreaks true outbreaks are common
barriers to detection temporal clustering of unrelated cases cross-transmission between community and nosocomial cases similarities between sporadic and linked cases small size of outbreaks best target for prevention may be preventing first transmission from high risk cases
66
Acknowledgements Karen Green Dr. D. Low Dr. A McGeer
Toronto Invasive Bacterial Disease Network We thank the microbiology laboratories, infection control practitioners, and physicians across Ontario without whose time, effort, and enthusiasm this surveillance would not be possible and the many staff members of the Ontario Ministry of Health and public health departments across Ontario who have supported this study.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.