1. Why pace? The influence of social, housing, management, life history, and demographic characteristics on locomotor stereotypy in zoo elephants 
Brian J. Greco, Cheryl L. Meehan, Jennifer L. Heinsius, Joy A. Mench 
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 
Volume 194, Pages (September 2017)
DOI: /j.applanim
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
The prevalence of SB major forms (stationary whole-body, locomotor, oral, and self-directed) and the average percentage of SB observations elephants performed each form.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science  , DOI: ( /j.applanim )
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
The influence of Percent Time Housed Separately (the percentage of time an elephant spends socially separate from herd mates) on the odds of Locomotor Presence. Social Group Contact was held constant at the average value of 1.6 social groups and Percent Time Indoor was held constant at the average value of 18.5%.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science  , DOI: ( /j.applanim )
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
The influence of Social Group Contact (the number of social groups of which an elephant is a member) on the odds of Locomotor Presence. Percent Time Housed Separately was held constant at the average value of 24.3% and Percent Time Indoor was held constant at the average value of 18.5%.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science  , DOI: ( /j.applanim )
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

5. Fig. 4
The influence of Percent Time Indoor (the percentage of time an elephant spent indoors) on the odds of Locomotor Presence. Percent Time Housed Separately was held constant at the average value of 24.3% and Social Group Contact was held constant at the average value of 1.6.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science  , DOI: ( /j.applanim )
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions