Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySharyl Potter Modified over 6 years ago
1
in the frame of the ERC Advanced Grant Agreement N°338953–TICAL
A Flagship project for Europe? Towards 10ps Time-of-Flight PET for a 10-fold sensitivity increase and equivalent dose reduction Paul Lecoq CERN, Geneva This work is performed in the frame of the ERC Advanced Grant Agreement N°338953–TICAL and the COST Action TD1401
2
Physics is at the forefront of major advances in Medical Imaging
Wilhelm Röntgen X-Ray discovery - NP1895 Felix Bloch Edward M. Purcell Magnetic resonance - NP1952 Allan MacLeod Cormack Sir Godfrey N. Hounsfield Tomographic principle - NP1979 In spite of these cultural differences and organizational difficulties physics has always been at the forefront of major advances in medical imaging Sir Peter Mansfield Paul C. Lauterbur MRI – NP2003 2
3
Invention of the PET/CT
PET/CT Combine anatomic and functional information Geneva University Invention of the PET/CT
4
Low dose digital X-Ray Imaging
Physics Nobel Price 1992 Georges Charpak CERN Physicist
5
“already transferred” technologies
Some illustrative “already transferred” technologies High Density Avalanche Chambers for pre-clinical PET Scintillating crystals for PET/SPECT (BGO) Photodetectors (PMT, SiPM) Fast, low noise, highly integrated front end electronics Intelligent multi-layered DAQ systems Simulation tools (Geant 4, GATE platform) And a number of technologies, on which our community spends a large amount of efforts and resources (with public money) , which constitutes a fertile breeding ground for innovation in the industrial domain Large scale highly distributed data management . . .
6
Arbitrary scale to not offend anybody
Impact of our action What are the reasons? - 0 - 100 Arbitrary scale to not offend anybody Too high fragmentation of our action Organization of our projects Funding schemes Too loose connections with the medical world Oportunistic Serendipity Cultural gap between physics and medicine Different appreciation scales for the performance of a system as seen by a physicist and by a MD Too few incentives to bridge this gap Potential impact Real impact Perceived impact Recognition
7
How to improve the Physics-Medicine synergy?
ERAMMIT project: EU INFRA IA2 call Enabling Research Access to Multiparametric Molecular Imaging Technologies Open Access set of translational infrastructures with in 4 pillars Isotopes production & radiochemistry for theranostics Hardware development and characterization Software development and characterization Preclinical & Clinical validation platform A very ambitious and federating project involving all the stakeholders: academy, industry, funding agencies 10ps TOFPET is one ERAMMIT JRA aiming at this goal Can be seen as a EU challenge, similar as the US EXPLORER Opens the way for EU-US collaboration, as the objectives are similar as EXPLORER but with a different technical approach Impossible , no Challenging? Certainly yes 12 septembre 1962: Kennedy said: we choose to go to the moon.
8
Why fast timing in PET? TOF state-of-the-art commercial scanners: ps ≈ 9cm on the LOR TOF for rejecting background events (event collimation) Requires 200ps TOF resolution for a few cm ROI (EndoTOFPET-US FP7 project) TOF for improving image S/N Requires 100ps TOF resolution for x5 S/N improvement, which brings a potential sensitivity gain (dose reduction) TOF for direct 3D information Requires 10ps TOF resolution for 1.5mm resolution along LOR TOF for restoring image quality for limited angle tomography
9
* SNR gain for 40 cm phantom
Time of Flight PET Dt = tA – tB = [(d+d1) – (d-d1)]/c Detector B d1 = c Dt/2 tB d d1 Patient 10ps TOF resolution SNRTOF/SNRCONV= 16! dx = 1.5mm e+ e- tA dt (ps) 100 300 500 1200 dx (cm) SNR* 1.5 4.5 7.5 18.0 5.2 3.0 2.3 * SNR gain for 40 cm phantom SNRTOF = √(2D/cDt) · SNRconv Detector A
10
How to extract the best time extimator
The detection chain Crystal SiPM electronics q2 g Dt Random deletion 1 Absorption Self-absorption Random deletion 2 SiPM PDE Unwanted pulses 2 DCR Unwanted pulses 1 DCR, cross talk Afterpulses How to extract the best time extimator from this complex series of hits? tkth pe = Dt Conversion depth + tk’ ph Scintillation process + ttransit Transit time jitter + tSPTR Single photon time spread + tTDC TDC conversion time
11
Parameters of interest to improve timing resolution
Parameters for LSO: Ce, Ca and Hamamatsu S P MPPC CTR improves like SQRT (photon time density) Rise time influence limited by SPTR (66ps) S. Gundacker, CERN-THESIS p.
12
Factors influencing scintillator time resolution
P. Lecoq et al, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 57 (2010) Besides all factors related to photodetection and readout electronics the scintillator contributes to the time resolution through: The light production mechanism Light yield, Rise time, Decay time The light transport in the crystal Time spread related to different light propagation modes The light extraction efficiency (LYLO) Impact on photostatistics Weights the distribution of light propagation modes
13
Best timing results at CERN
LSO:Ce, 0.4%Ca, melmount coupled to 3x3mm2 NUV SiPM from FBK, 55%PDE 2x2mm2 section 511 KeV 150GeV muons 5MeV deposited S. Gundacker et al., CERN
14
Fast sintillation timing: the way to reconstructionless TOFPET
P Lecoq et al. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 718 (2013) 569 No TOF Ultrafast Nano-crystals ZnO:Ga 700 ps Photonic crystals ZnO:Ga 20 fold increase in photon density as compared to LSO:Ce, Ca. 500ps compared to 30ns, light yiled 1/3 of LSO:Ce, Ca 500 ps Digital 3D SiPM 300 ps
15
Avalanche development in a 50mm diameter SPAD
Two factors determine the timing resolution of a SiPM. the time jitter of the avalnche development within a SPAD The time transit spread of the signals from different SPADs to the collecting anode. On the first point the group of Cova and Rech in Milano are studying the influence of the SPAD geometry on the avanche development. This is a measurement, not a simulation! This is slow motion move showing in 30sec the 1.2ns development of the avalanche in a 50microns circular SPAD *** photon-triggered secondary avalanches start to develop (The image is the level of the current, but the emitted light is proportional to the current so to end is the same- the emission is centered around 1um and reach 4-500nm in the blue and in the IR-Yes the point is the assisted mechanism- the rim is more intense because it is less quenched by the space charge resistor.) Ivan Rech, Politecnico di Milano
16
Quantum dots stimulated emission
In nano-structured systems the delta like density of electronic states predicts a low, temperature-independant lasing threshold Core/shell quantum dots systems (CdSe/CdS) suppress non radiative recombinations in colloïdal quantum dot structures Consequence is to lower the population inversion threshold to a few mJ/cm2 time photon energy Spontanous emission 100ps Stimulated emission <1ps J.Grim, I.Moreels, ITT, Italy
17
Nanoplates-Preliminary tests results
J.Grim, ITT, Italy LSO plate 1mm thick + CdSe nanoplate film 100mm thick 372 nm laser Streak Camera Focal spot LSO 1 mm 100mm CdSe film deposition optical table R. Martinez Turtos, CERN Focus in CdSe film 540nm 420nm Focus in LSO crystal 540nm 420nm Left: Streak focussed on CdSe: Fast peak from laser excitation of CdSe. Long tail CdSe excitation by LSO scintillation light. Emission >540nm = LSO emissionnot absorbed by CdSe Right: Streak focussed on LSO
18
Metamaterials: Towards a self-triggered lasing g-ray detector
Ionization density per dE/dx event can reach > 1020 eV/ cm3 ≈ 10J/cm3 Ultrafast X-ray or g-ray self-triggered stimulated emission is within reach τR τSE CB VB detectable SE Courtesy J.Grim, I.Moreels, ITT, Italy Geant 4 simulation J. Grim, ITT, Italy
19
The dream of the ”fast timing imager”
Implies ≈ mm resolution along PET LOR Thank you Requires ≈ 10ps timing resolution 1mSv PET exposure ≈ 1 flight Paris-SF
20
Acknowledgements Joel Grim, Iwan Moreels, IIT, Genova, It
V. Nagirnyi, S. Omelkov, Univ. Tartu M. Korzhik, INP, Minsk A. Vasiliev, Lomonosov State University, Moscow CERN collaborators (E. Auffray, S. Gundacker, R. Martinez Turtos et al.) PICOSEC Marie Curie TN ERC Advanced Grant FAST COST Action TURBOPET Eurostars
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.