1. 2015 Senior Promotion Workshop Series
Welcome
2015 Senior Promotion Workshop Series
Workshop # 2 – April
Dr David White, Interim Chair, DFCM
Dr Barbara Stubbs, Director, Professional Development Program. DFCM
Marie Leverman, Academic Promotions Coordinator, DFCM

2. Friendly Reminder …. Confidentiality at the Workshops
1. spoken, written, acted on, etc., in strict privacy or secrecy; secret: a confidential remark
2. indicating confidence or intimacy; imparting private matters: a confidential tone of voice
3. having another's trust or confidence; entrusted with secrets or private affairs: a confidential secretary.

3. Goal of the Workshop #2
Goal
Lecture
Videos
Individual Assessment
To help you look at the work you are engaged in and evaluate your scholarly potential
To assist you in preparing the pre-application and identifying your five scholarly pieces

4. Objectives At the end of this session, participants will:
Understand the criteria for promotion
Identify accomplishments of scholarship
(research, teaching & education, creative professional activity and administrative service)
 You will map the foundation of your pre-application

5. Sample Pre-Applications
Samples provided
For reference purposes only
Please do not photocopy or take home!.

6. Agenda and Work Plan Research CPA Teaching & Education Admin Service
5 Publications
Scholarly Work
Individual
WORK TIME

7. Who has helped you in the senior promotion process?
Video #1
Who has helped you in the senior promotion process?
Produced by:
Brian Da Silva
Marie Leverman

8. The Pre-Application Dr Barbara Stubbs

9. Faculty are required to submit a
The Pre-Application
Faculty are required to submit a
Senior Promotion Pre-Application to the DFCM Senior Promotions Committee (SPC) in order to obtain feedback regarding
readiness for promotion.

10. You need to claim “excellence” in one category .
Claiming Excellence
You need to claim “excellence” in one category .
Research
CPA
Teaching
&
Education
Admin
Service

11. For the first part of the pre-application, we are reviewing:
Research
CPA

12. 3.1 RESEARCH
“Promotion based on research requires that the candidate has a record of sustained and current productivity in research and research-related activities.”
Research funding
Publications
Scientific presentations
Participation, leadership and mentorship in the research community

13. 3.2 Creative Professional Activity (CPA)
“The Faculty of Medicine acknowledges CPA under the following three broad categories:”
Professional Innovation and Creative Excellence
Contributions to the Development of Professional Practice
Exemplary Professional Practice
Page 14
In the Manual

14. Here are a few examples:
CPA (continued)
Here are a few examples:
Scholarly publications: books, chapters, monographs
Non peer reviewed and lay publications
Invitations to scholarly meetings, workshops
Invitations to lay meetings or talks/interviews with media and lay publications
Guidelines, consensus conference proceedings
Development of health policies
Additional Examples:
Media coverage
Presentations to regulatory bodies, governments, etc.
Creation of media (e.g., websites, CDs)
Innovation and entrepreneurial activity, as evidenced by new products or new ventures launched or assisted, licensed patents.
Technology or knowledge transfer

15. Pre-Application – Work Time

16. The Pre-Application Dr David White

17. For the second part of the pre-application, we are reviewing:
Research
CPA
Teaching & Education
Admin Service

18. 3.3 Teaching and Education
“Promotion requires that the candidate has contributed in a meaningful way to achievement of the Faculty’s and University’s educational mission. The nature, quantity and quality of these contributions will be evaluated with reference to department and hospital norms.”
Page 18
In the Manual

19. Teaching and Education (continued)
In the Faculty of Medicine, teachers and educators
can show evidence of excellence or competence in
one or more of the following areas:
Undergraduate education
Graduate education
Postgraduate medical education
Post-doctoral training
Continuing education and faculty development
Patient/public education
Page 18
In the Manual

20. IMPORTANT TO INCLUDE: SAMPLE PROVIDED Document Name:
Teaching data summary = typed in Word
Teaching and education report = generated in WebCV

21. 3.4 Administrative Service
“Service to the University means primarily Administrative or committee work within the University. Consideration will also be given to activities outside the University, which further the scholarly and educational goals of the University.” Administrative Service in itself cannot be the main criteria for promotion.
Page 23
In the Manual

22. Administrative Service
Such activities might include:
Service to professional societies directly related to the candidate’s discipline
Continuing education activities
Work with professional, technical or scholarly organizations or scholarly products
Membership on or service to governmental committees and commissions

23. Pre-Application – Work Time
Provide a summary of the evidence of impact, importance and/or innovation.

25. What has this senior promotion meant to you?
Video #3
What has this senior promotion meant to you?
Produced by:
Brian Da Silva
Marie Leverman

26. The Pre-Application Dr Barbara Stubbs

27. For the final part of the pre-application, we are reviewing:
Research
CPA
Teaching
& Education
Admin Service
5 Publications
Scholarly Work

28. Five Significant Scholarly Products
Five scholarly pieces of work/publications are required
You must clearly state the significance and
geographic scope of impact
(local, provincial, national, international)
# 1
# 2
# 3
# 4
# 5

29. Five Significant Scholarly Products/ Publications
Can include a variety of “work”:
Publications- peer reviewed journals
Book or book chapter
Government documents, reports
Curriculum design document
“Learning object” – e.g.. a teaching video
Websites
National level work
Creative professional activity

30. Five Significant Scholarly Products – Work Time

31. Closing Comments Marie Leverman

32. Closing Comments Friday May 13 2016
is the deadline date to submit your pre-application. 
DFCM Senior Promotions Committee will be meeting on June 2  report to candidate asap

33. Important Dates WORKSHOP # 3 – TUESDAY JUNE 21 To review….
pre-application samples
successful dossiers
To be confirmed …
webcv workshop
drop in session

34. Any Questions

35. Please complete using the iclickers
Evaluations
Please complete using the iclickers

36. Please wait for instructions…..
Power “ON” your clicker
Wait for instructions please……..
Do you have an iclicker in your hand? (test question)
A – Yes
B – No
C – What is an iclicker?
D – This is fun!
E – I do not understand…

37. Evaluation
I have a better understanding to identify my areas of excellence/competence for a senior promotion:
A – Strongly Agree
B – Agree
C – Somewhat
D – Disagree
E – Strongly Disagree

38. Evaluation
I have a better understanding to identify my five scholarly pieces of work for a senior promotion:
A – Strongly Agree
B – Agree
C – Somewhat
D – Disagree
E – Strongly Disagree

39. Evaluation
I have a better understanding of the components and preparation of the
pre-application?
A – Strongly Agree
B – Agree
C – Somewhat
D – Disagree
E – Strongly Disagree

40. Evaluation
Upon completing this workshop, I have mapped out my pre-application.
A – Strongly Agree
B – Agree
C – Somewhat
D – Disagree
E – Strongly Disagree

41. Evaluation
Working in groups specific to the area I wish to claim “excellence” in was very helpful:
A – Strongly Agree
B – Agree
C – Somewhat
D – Disagree
E – Strongly Disagree

42. Evaluation
I plan on submitting a pre-application for this academic year”
A – Strongly Agree
B – Agree
C – Somewhat
D – Disagree
E – Strongly Disagree

43. Evaluation
I found the Videos to be informative and helpful in going forward in the senior promotion process:
A – Strongly Agree
B – Agree
C – Somewhat
D – Disagree
E – Strongly Disagree

44. Evaluation 3 hours was adequate time for Workshop #2:
A – Strongly Agree
B – Agree
C – Somewhat
D – Disagree
E – Strongly Disagree

45. Evaluation
If a WebCV workshop was held (specifically for a senior promotion), I would be interested in attending:
A – Strongly Agree
B – Agree
C – Somewhat
D – Disagree
E – Strongly Disagree

46. Evaluation What time of day would work best for a WebCV workshop:
A 9:00 to 10:30 am
B 10:30 – 12 noon
C 12 noon to 1:30
D 1:30 to 3:00
E 3:00 to 4:30

47. Drop In Session – optional review time
The drop in is open to all candidates going
forward in the senior promotion process in the current year. Candidates may meet with members of the Senior Promotions Committee to review and discuss their dossier.
I would be interested to attend the drop in session:
A – Strongly Agree
B – Agree
C – Somewhat
D – Disagree
E – Strongly Disagree

48. Evaluation Overall, I found the workshop to be:
A – Very informative and helpful
B – Somewhat informative and helpful
C – Okay
D – Just Okay
E – Won’t come again

49. Comment Cards….please complete
Comment cards have been placed on the table.
Please let us know how this workshop will make a different to you in the future?

50. Thank You Power “OFF” your clicker Please leave at the table ……..
See you at Workshop # 3
Power “OFF” your clicker
Please leave at the table ……..
Thank You