Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byChloe Harmon Modified over 6 years ago
1
Tectonic subsidence history of the Pannonian Basin revisited
Attila Balázs Eötvös Loránd University Department of Geophysics and Space Sciences
2
Thickness map of the basin fill and main structural features
2 Thickness map of the basin fill and main structural features Horváth et al 2005
3
Presentation outline Thermomechanical model of the Pannonian Basin
3 Presentation outline Thermomechanical model of the Pannonian Basin Definition and calculation of tectonic subsidence: backstripping Breakthrough in Pannonian Basin time stratigraphy New results – New model
4
Major phases in the evolution of the Pannonian Basin
4 ONSET OF RIFTING 1 Major phases in the evolution of the Pannonian Basin SYN-RIFT PHASE subsidence > sediment accumulation 2 EARLY POST-RIFT PHASE only local extension, thermal subsidence due to cooling 3 LATE POST-RIFT & NEOTECTONIC PHASE major differential subsidence & uplift 4 after Horváth et al., 1998
5
Basin scale tectonic-stratigraphic model
5 Basin scale tectonic-stratigraphic model After Horváth, 2007
6
Decompacted subsidence history
6 Decompacted subsidence history Well-I Basement
7
Sediment accumulation model
7 Sediment accumulation model Shelf edge trajectory Juhász, 1998 Magyar, 2009
8
8 Seismic example N S
9
9 Backstrip method Input data: Lithological profile
10
Backstrip method Input data: Lithological profile 10
After Uhrin and Sztanó 2011
11
Backstrip method Input data: Lithological profile Normal compaction
11 Backstrip method Input data: Lithological profile Normal compaction trend curves
12
Backstrip method Input data: Lithological profile Normal compaction
12 Backstrip method Input data: Lithological profile Normal compaction trend curves New chronostratigraphy based on the shelf progradation model (I. Magyar, O. Sztanó, A. Uhrin)
13
Backstrip method Calculations: Decompaction Unloading (Airy isostasy)
13 Backstrip method Calculations: Decompaction Unloading (Airy isostasy)
14
14 Study area with wells
15
Results km km Total subsidence Tectonic subsidence Total subsidence
15 Results Time (Ma) Time (Ma) km km Total subsidence Tectonic subsidence Total subsidence Tectonic subsidence Tectonic subsidence rate mm/yr Tectonic subsidence rate mm/yr
16
Results km Total subsidence Tectonic subsidence km Total subsidence
16 Results Time (Ma) Time (Ma) km Total subsidence Tectonic subsidence km Total subsidence Tectonic subsidence Tectonic subsidence rate mm/yr Tectonic subsidence rate mm/yr
17
Results Total subsidence Tectonic subsidence km
17 Results Time (Ma) Total subsidence Tectonic subsidence km Tectonic subsidence rate mm/yr
18
Results km km Total subsidence Tectonic subsidence Total subsidence
18 Results Time (Ma) Time (Ma) km km Total subsidence Tectonic subsidence Total subsidence Tectonic subsidence Tectonic subsidence rate mm/yr Tectonic subsidence rate mm/yr
19
19 Conclusion Dramatic early Pannonian subsidence cannot be explained by thermomechanical model Dinamic influence is required to generate this postrift subsidence After Horváth, 2007
20
20 Acknowledgements András Uhrin Ferenc Horváth Gábor Bada
21
21 Conclusion Dramatic early Pannonian subsidence cannot be explained by thermomechanical model Dinamic influence is required to generate this postrift subsidence After Horváth, 2007
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.