Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Statistics and indicators – GHG review cycle 2016
Presentation title Statistics and indicators – GHG review cycle 2016 14th meeting of GHG Inventory Lead Reviewers Bonn, Germany, 8–9 March 2017 Roman Payo | UNFCCC secretariat | Mitigation, Data and Analysis Programme
2
not so usual usual 44 Annex I Parties reviewed: Convention and KP
Presentation title GHG review cycle 2016 44 Annex I Parties reviewed: Convention and KP 2015 ‘gap year’ 2016 = 2015 and submissions, and initial reports for CP2 Nine in-country (9 × 1 Parties) Ten centralized (9 × 3, 1 × 4 Parties) Two desk (2 × 2 Parties) 118 review reports (4000+ pages) to be published resource intensive not so usual usual
3
Experts participating in the review cycle 2016
Presentation title Experts participating in the review cycle 2016 67% 217 experts from 78 Parties (145 funded) FCCC: 196 Parties 40% ‘represented’ 289 experts invited 72 experts declined/unable 45 experts were swapped to another ERT 37 new experts 17% of participating experts All ERTs complete Large number of experts ‘expert-intensive’ Difficulty finding experts, esp. for desk reviews 25%
4
Reviews and Experts participating in 2010–2016
Presentation title Reviews and Experts participating in 2010–2016 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Reviews 42 43 44 39 4 ICR 10 9 11 2 1 CR 8 7 DR Experts (Party) 163 (63) 126 (54) 157 (67) 172 (69) 161 (67) 38 (21) 217 (78) Doubling 18 16 20 New exp 33 24 38 34 30 3 37 217 experts, all time record excellent for process but managing, organizing & $$ costs
5
ARRs publication process 2010–2016
Presentation title ARRs publication process 2010–2016 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Drafts to Parties (number of reports) by 31 Jan 17 5 7 10 (28) by 28 Feb 26 10 15 22 24 4 16 (41) Published review reports 6 1 8 2 9 11 by 14 Apr 16 ~20* * estimated
6
118 reports, 4000+ pages to be published
1 pending issue for 1 sector can delay entire ARR
7
Possible elements conclusions LRs meeting
Presentation title Possible elements conclusions LRs meeting 2016: unusually large number of reports, big efforts by experts and costs Difficulties finding experts for desk reviews: number of experts and geographical balance Parties to support availability their experts, including for DRs
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.