Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
T.L. Brink Crafton Hills College Yucaipa CA 92399 tlbrink@
craftonhills.edu
2
a Retrospective and Prospective Self-Report
Religiosity: a Retrospective and Prospective Self-Report
3
Religiosity: retrospective & prospective
4
https://goo.gl/csWGZq
5
Not about which religious tradition one adheres to …
Religiosity Not about which religious tradition one adheres to …
6
Religiosity
7
About how religious one is.
Religiosity About how religious one is.
8
Religiosity
10
Religiosity: countries
11
one item measures of religiosity are commonly employed
Norenzayan & Hansen (2006) one item measures of religiosity are commonly employed
12
How important would you say religion is in your own life?
Religiosity (Gallup, 2013) How important would you say religion is in your own life?
13
Religiosity norms (Gallup, 2013)
Very 55% Fairly 26% Not very 19%
14
Religiosity Gallup Norms This sample
15
Religiosity
16
Norris & Inglehart (2004) Religiosity is decreasing because modern society provides more “existential security”
17
“the worldwide secular trend is irreversible”
Bruce (2011) “the worldwide secular trend is irreversible”
18
Ecklund (2010) Under-represented in the ranks of scientists: Catholics Evangelical Protestants Black Protestants
19
Ecklund (2010) Over-represented in the ranks of scientists: Atheists & Agnostics Jews & Liberal Protestants
20
Is there a decline in religiosity within the millennial cohort?
Question #1 Is there a decline in religiosity within the millennial cohort?
21
Question #2 If so, is this a historical trend or merely a phase for this cohort’s young adulthood?
22
METHOD
23
Two in Southern California
Four studies Over last 18 months Two in Southern California (March & October 2014) Two in Mexico (June 2015)
24
First two studies at this site
Crafton Hills College
25
“Inland Empire” Between Los Angeles & Palm Springs
26
“Inland Empire” San Bernardino & Riverside Counties
Between Los Angeles & Palm Springs San Bernardino & Riverside Counties
27
Population Riverside 300k San Bernardino 210k Redlands 70k
Highland k Yucaipa k Beaumont k Banning k
28
Population Riverside 300k minor San Bernardino 210k minor
Redlands k major Highland k major Yucaipa k major Beaumont k minor Banning k minor
29
Household Income Redlands $58k Riverside $42k Highland $41k
Beaumont $40k Yucaipa $39k Banning $32k San Bernardino $20k
30
Adults with BA degrees California 30% Redlands 38% Riverside 20%
San Bernardino 11%
31
Based on enrollment data from Fall 2011
Population Based on enrollment data from Fall 2011
32
Between 5,500 and 6,500 over past five years
Enrollment Between 5,500 and 6,500 over past five years
33
Enrollment Full-Time = 12+ units 37.3% Part-Time = under 12 units
62.7%
34
Gender Male 49% Female 51%
35
Age Under % 20 – % 25 – % 30 – % 35 – % 40 – % 50 or older % Unknown %
36
Median and Modal category of 20-24
Age Median and Modal category of
37
Ethnicity Asian 5% African Am 6.3% Hispanic 34.8% Native Am 0.6%
Caucasian % Unknown %
38
Transfer to U.C. Riverside Cal State S.B. U of Redlands Loma Linda U
Cal Baptist U
39
Career & Technical Fire Science Paramedic Respiratory Radiography
Child Dev
40
Represented + Seventh-day Adventist + Latter Day Saint
+ Roman Catholic + Evangelical Christian
41
Under-Represented Jehovah’s Witness Jewish Muslim Buddhist
42
Under-Represented Hindu Jain Sikh Zoroastrian
43
sample CHC #1 N = 107
44
sample CHC #1 N = 107 Males = 42%
45
sample CHC #1 78% under age 25
46
Op def CHC #1 Over the past five years, has your level of religion (spirituality) declined, increased or remained the same?
47
Op def CHC #1 Over the next ten years, will your level of religion (spirituality) declined, increased or remained the same?
48
RESULTS
49
RESULTS #1 Increasing = 51% Stable = 38% Decreasing = 10%
50
RESULTS #1
51
RESULTS #1 P < .001 Kolmogorov- Smirnov
52
sample CHC #2 N = 73
53
sample CHC #2 N = 73 Males = 42%
54
sample CHC #2 majority under age 20
55
sample CHC #2 SDA = 5% Catholic = 11% Christian = 44%
56
sample CHC #2 Other Rel = 14% None = 36%
57
Op def CHC #2 On a scale of 0 to 10, how religious
58
Op def CHC #2 On a scale of 0 to 10, how spiritual
59
Op def CHC #2 Are you now? Were you at 14? Will you be in ten years?
60
RESULTS
61
RESULTS #2 Correlation Rel now & Rel future +.93
62
RESULTS #2 Age 14 = 5.6 Present = 4.9 Future = 5.9
63
RESULTS #2
64
RESULTS #2 P < .001 Friedman
65
RISE
66
DIP
67
FALL
68
FLAT 14%
69
FLAT FLOOR 4%
70
FLAT CEILING 10%
71
PEAK 1%
72
RESULTS #2 Rise 37% Dip 25% Fall 23% Flat 14% Peak 1%
73
RESULTS #2
74
Next two studies at Mexican sites
Gerontology Conference & Private University
75
UCSJ
76
UCSJ
77
UCSJ
78
UCSJ Fundado 1979
79
UCSJ Alumnos 1,582
80
CIIVE
81
CIIVE / UNAM
82
CIIVE
83
Sample size UCSJ N = 58 CIIVE N = 22
84
Percent male CIIVE 22% UCSJ 34%
85
Median Age UCSJ 21 CIIVE 23
86
Mitofsky December 2014
88
Religioso National norm 7.1
89
Religioso National norm 7.1 Vs. 7.8 (2001)
90
RESULTS
91
Correlations Rel now & Rel future +.89
92
Rel UCSJ now 3.0 2 Mean Median Mode
93
Rel UCSJ future 3.6 2 Mean Median Mode
94
Rel CIIVE now 6.1 8 Mean Median Mode
95
Rel CIIVE future 6.5 8 10 Mean Median Mode
96
RESULTS 7.1 3.0 3.6 6.1 6.5 Rel Variable Mitofsky UCSJ now UCSJ future
CIIVE now CIIVE future Rel 7.1 3.0 3.6 6.1 6.5
97
UCSJ vs. CIIVE
98
Significant Difference?
between present & future?
99
UCSJ Religiosity Present vs. Future p < .05
100
CIIVE Religiosity Present vs. Future p > .10
101
Significant Difference?
between groups?
102
Present Religiosity UCSJ vs. CIIVE p < .001
103
Present Religiosity UCSJ vs. CIIVE Cohen’s d = -1.17 Hedge’s g = -1.33
104
Future Religiosity UCSJ vs. CIIVE p < .001
105
Future Religiosity UCSJ vs. CIIVE Cohen’s d = -1.07 Hedge’s g = -1.18
106
DISCUSSION
107
Conclusions Millennials (especially at UCSJ) have lower levels of religiosity than national norms
108
Conclusions Millennials predict that their levels of religiosity will rise in the future
109
Explanation These findings must be explained in the personal and social functions of religion.
110
Riesebrodt (2010) "a complex of practices that are based on the premise of the existence of superhuman powers …
111
Riesebrodt (2010) "a complex of practices that are based on the premise of the existence of superhuman powers, whether personal or impersonal, that are generally invisible"
112
Riesebrodt (2010) "all religions claim to have the ability to avert misfortune, overcome crises, and provide salvation." (p. 89)
113
“DERMS” definition of Carmody & Brink (2013)
114
Religion is a system of doctrines ethics rituals myths symbols
for the expression of ultimate relevance
115
Carmody & Brink (2013) “Perhaps it is more appropriate to view religion as a series of choices that individuals and communities make …”
116
Which doctrines to accept?
Carmody & Brink (2013) Which doctrines to accept?
117
Which ethics to follow? Carmody & Brink (2013)
Which doctrines to accept? Which ethics to follow?
118
Which rituals to practice?
Carmody & Brink (2013) Which doctrines to accept? Which ethics to follow? Which rituals to practice?
119
Which myths to retell? Carmody & Brink (2013) Which ethics to follow?
Which doctrines to accept? Which ethics to follow? Which rituals to practice? Which myths to retell?
120
Carmody & Brink (2013) Which myths to retell? Which ethics to follow?
Which doctrines to accept? Which ethics to follow? Which rituals to practice? Which myths to retell? Which symbols to revere?
121
Carmody & Brink (2013) Which symbols to revere?
Which doctrines to accept? Which ethics to follow? Which rituals to practice? Which myths to retell? Which symbols to revere? Which persons will lead us?
122
Carmody & Brink (2013) “The behavioral components of religion (ritual, ethics) are more important than doctrine.”
123
Carmody & Brink (2013) “Although it is doctrine that gives us the cognitive reframing that enables religion to bring new understanding of ourselves and our conditions …”
124
Carmody & Brink (2013) “it is the dozens of daily inspired acts of self-restraint (ethics) and communal celebration (ritual) that enable people to grow in their commitments.”
125
“Religion is more action than thought …”
Carmody & Brink (2013) “Religion is more action than thought …”
126
Carmody & Brink (2013) “Religion is more action than thought, more process than product” p. 386
127
Ecklund (2010) A quarter of scientists who identified themselves as atheists or agnostics nevertheless identified themselves as spiritual.
128
Longitudinal study of religiosity over the life cycle
Dillon & Wink (2009) Longitudinal study of religiosity over the life cycle
129
Ellison & Burdette (2012) A sense of control is positively correlated with most aspects of religion (e.g., attendance, afterlife)
130
Ellison & Burdette (2012) A sense of control is positively correlated with most aspects of religion (e.g., attendance, afterlife) but other aspects are negatively correlated (e.g., sin, literalism)
131
Gebauer, Sedikides & Neberich (2012)
Religiosity has psychological benefits, but only in those societies where religiosity is seen as a virtue.
132
The epidemic of depression is due to loss of reliance on religion.
Brink (1993) The epidemic of depression is due to loss of reliance on religion.
133
Ancient Christian Wisdom and Aaron Beck's Cognitive Therapy
Trader (2011) Ancient Christian Wisdom and Aaron Beck's Cognitive Therapy
134
Future Research Larger sample Instructions Sites Other variables
135
Future Research Religious studies must use qualitative (e.g., focus groups, ethnographies) in addition to, rather than instead of, quantitative methods (Brink, 1995)
136
Future Research The next cycle of research should utilize qualitative methods (e.g., participant observation, focus groups) to figure out the relationships between religious components and the cultural context in which they are accepted (Brink, 1999).
137
T.L. Brink Crafton Hills College Yucaipa CA 92399 tlbrink@
craftonhills.edu
138
https://goo.gl/csWGZq
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.