Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Tracking social and cultural benefits

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Tracking social and cultural benefits"— Presentation transcript:

1 Tracking social and cultural benefits
… of waterway investment Dr Tamara Boyd, INtrinsic SCOPE Pty Ltd Rippling Water (Basic) Note: This video template is optimized for Microsoft PowerPoint 2010. In PowerPoint 2007, video elements will play, but any content overlapping the video bars will be covered by the video when in slideshow mode. In PowerPoint 2003, video will not play, but the poster frame of the videos will remain in place as static images. The video: Plays automatically after each slide transition. Is 15 seconds long. Seamlessly loops for infinite playback. To add slides or change layout: To add a new slide, on the Home tab, in the Slides group, click the arrow under New Slide, then click under Motion Background Theme, then select the desired layout. To change the layout of an existing slide, on the Home tab, in the Slides group, click Layout, then select the desired layout. Other animated elements: Any animated element you insert will begin after the slide transition and the background video has started. Layouts with video effects: The “(Green) Title and Content” and “(Purple) Title and Content” layouts are creating by using a color overlay on the video. With the video selected, under Video Tools, on the Format tab, in the Adjust group, select Color and choose Teal, Accent Color 6 Light (third row, seventh option from left) or Periwinkle, Accent Color 5 Light (third row, sixth option from left). BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

2 BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY
They are also intended to complement future economic analysis and/or non-biophysical outputs BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

3 Design principles Identify how works can achieve changes in resource condition which support social and cultural values Set long-term targets and system trajectories Track progress towards both objectives and outcomes Complement existing waterway management tools Find measures which can be practically resourced Focus on tangible results They are also intended to complement future economic analysis and/or non-biophysical outputs BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

4 Cultural & heritage values
Resource Social state Project objectives Condition of the resource (waterway, cultural heritage site or public infrastructure) is improved or maintained to support: Recreation values Cultural & heritage values Communities are better positioned to contribute to the resource condition objective e.g.: Active & engaged communities Informed & aware communities Management outcomes Changes to the resource impacting: Amenity Accessibility Cultural heritage Changes to the social state impacting: Awareness, skills Collaboration Outputs Biophysical/physical: Environmental works e.g. vegetation, weed control, rubbish removal, water regime Structural works e.g. visitor facilities, fence, bollard, road or crossing, waterway structure Non-biophysical: Result of activities generally related to people’s involvement Engagement events Publications Agreements or partnerships MERI process - maps outputs to target resource conditions supporting social and cultural values Allows consistent approach to progress reporting BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

5 Project Objectives Indices for the site’s capacity to support activity
Recreation Capacity Index and/or Cultural and Heritage Capacity Index An increase suggests potential for enhanced activity (through improved condition of the physical resources supporting such use) A maximum score is not the aim. Indicators and their trajectory recognise a site’s unique context BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

6 Recreation Capacity Index
Two measures and 5-point ratings for components: On and In Water = Rec fishing, non-motor boating, motor boating, swimming, camping* Beside Water = Tracks, sightseeing, picnics and barbecues, hunting, environmental volunteering Index is the sum of the activity metrics as a % of the total possible score (25) A review of AVIRA recommended the social values within the AVIRA framework be reviewed to remove the subjectivity of scoring, particularly by improving the metrics for Beside Water Activity to include scaling of scores, rather than just presence or absence of activity. Note – could combine and this would solve the camping dilemma! The Victorian Waterway Health Social Condition Benchmarking Project found camping is often associated with boating, fishing and swimming, suggesting that these activities are of longer duration than beside water use and more likely associated with holidays. BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

7 AVIRA Metric – Beside water activity (picnic/barbecue)
Value Score Descriptor 5 Designated picnic/barbecue area present No designated picnic/barbecue area present Alternate Metric – Beside water activity (picnics and barbecues) Value Score Descriptor 5 Designated picnic/barbecue area with facilities able to sustain larger numbers e.g. multiple barbecues and picnic tables, shelter, toilets, play equipment, car park 4 Designated picnic/barbecue area with facilities able to sustain moderate numbers e.g. barbecue and several picnic tables, near toilets and car park. Robust enough to let visitors bring more equipment and infrastructure. 3 Designated picnic/barbecue area with facilities able to sustain small numbers e.g. barbecue and single table. 2 Designated picnic area with facilities able to sustain small numbers e.g. picnic table, no barbecue. 1 Area able to support basic picnic e.g. seating or shelter. No designated picnic/barbecue area present BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

8 New Metric – Environmental volunteering
Value Score Descriptor 5 Multiple (>3), active community groups and networks* regularly contribute to maintaining or improving the site OR % of the ‘target audience’** are consistently engaged in environmental activity across the site 4 2-3 active community groups and networks often contribute to maintaining or improving the site OR 60-80% of the ‘target audience’ are consistently engaged in environmental activity across the site 3 One active community volunteer group or network contributes to maintaining or improving site condition OR 40-60% of the ‘target audience’ are consistently engaged in environmental activity across the site 2 Informal community group or network present OR 20-40% of the ‘target audience’ are consistently engaged in environmental activity across the site 1 Community group present but have not undertaken any significant group activities or projects on the site OR <20% of the ‘target audience’ are consistently engaged in environmental activity across the site No community group present or ‘target audience’ activity * Both on-ground works and monitoring, funded and unfunded. Fluker posts would count as one ‘group’ given they encourage community-based environmental monitoring ** e.g. farmers, Landcare groups, Waterwatch, Parks Victoria, Friends of groups, schools, Local Government, Indigenous community, NGOs, CoMs, Field and Game BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

9 1A Recreation Capacity Index: Beside Water Activity scores: Pre-works
Target No works Benefit  Tracks 1 3 2 Sightseeing  Picnics and barbecues Hunting 4  Env’l volunteering Total score 11 16 9 7 Indicator (%) 44 64 36 28 Based on works program and logic BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

10 BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017
MANAGED BY

11 C&H Capacity Index Includes the following activity metrics:
Site significance - Historic heritage Site significance - Indigenous heritage Cultural use of resources Connection to country Cultural heritage volunteering BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

12 BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017
MANAGED BY

13 Management outcomes Change to the resource condition (supporting social/cultural values) expected to occur via: Amenity Accessibility Cultural heritage Satisfaction with tangible provisions will influence use of the site Assess target audience satisfaction with key waterway attributes Accepted as a measure of impact if satisfaction changes significantly due to management action. Likert scale: very satisfied (5) to very dissatisfied (1) Target audience: land managers, community groups, local residents, indigenous community members etc Common attributes are recommended – allowing for consistent metrics BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

14 Amenity core attributes
Vegetation extent Vegetation appearance (structure, diversity) Soil stability (as it affects water quality i.e. erosion or sedimentation) Rubbish removal Visitor facilities e.g. aesthetic pleasure has consistently been found to be one of the most important motivations for outdoor recreation. A wide range of waterway works can have positive outcomes for amenity The pleasantness of a site affects people’s use of the site Waterway amenity also supports economic values Amenity supplementary attributes: Water quantity Water flow Water quality (characteristics other than erosion and sedimentation which are covered as a core attribute e.g. pollution or algae) Habitat for wildlife, fish, other aquatic animals Visitor information about the waterway These are not directly linked in Output Data Standard MW do survey satisfaction with ‘quantity of water flowing in’ to waterway BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

15 BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | 18 - 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY
Survey to establish benchmark, then allocate trajectory to target An 80% threshold for satisfaction metrics equates to the average score of 4 of 5 (or satisfied) on the standard Likert scale. Therefore establishing a KPI of 80% for the following provision scores would be the ideal target. Ultimately the target must consider the site’s unique context and work program. BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY

16 Case studies underway with CMAs:
Templates developed Case studies underway with CMAs: Scoring Indicators to be tracked Target audiences Survey approach Benchmark surveys MER Plan targets Refine approach/guidance Mike Nurse (Secretariat Fed’n Vic T. O. Corporations) who suggested combined meeting with Will Mooney (MLDRN) BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA | SEPTEMBER 2017 MANAGED BY


Download ppt "Tracking social and cultural benefits"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google