Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byFátima Aleixo Lima Modified over 6 years ago
1
Monophasic and biphasic shock for transthoracic conversion of atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and network meta-analysis José Francisco Secorun Inácio, Michele dos Santos Gomes da Rosa, Julie Shah, Jeferson Rosário, João Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci, André Luiz Langer Manica, Clarissa Garcia Rodrigues Resuscitation Volume 100, Pages (March 2016) DOI: /j.resuscitation Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions
2
Fig. 1 Study selection workflow diagram.
Resuscitation , 66-75DOI: ( /j.resuscitation ) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions
3
Fig. 2 Comparison between Biphasic and Monophasic, sub-grouped by Biphasic type—(a) First shock success rate. (b) Overall success rate. (c) Cumulative Energy in Joules to achieve success. (d) Number of shocks to achieve success. Resuscitation , 66-75DOI: ( /j.resuscitation ) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions
4
Fig. 3 Network of Clinical Trials comparing defibrillation waveforms for Atrial fibrillation cardioversion—Solid lines represent direct comparison trials and dashed lines represent indirect comparisons. BTE1: PhysioControl Biphasic, BTE2: Philips SMART Biphasic, RBW: Zoll Rectilinear Biphasic, MDS: Monophasic Damped Sine. Resuscitation , 66-75DOI: ( /j.resuscitation ) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.