Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

AAE 451 Team 3 Critical Design Review

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "AAE 451 Team 3 Critical Design Review"— Presentation transcript:

1 AAE 451 Team 3 Critical Design Review
Jon Amback Melissa Doan Stacie Pedersen Kevin Badger Jason Hargraves Colleen Rainbolt Greg Davidson Etan Karni Lazo Trkulja March 24, 2005 Tyler Start

2 Mission Specifications
8 Minute Endurance Vstall ≤ 20 fps Vloiter ≤ 30 fps Climb ≥ 20 descent ≤ -5.5 Stylish

3 Style Features Canard pusher configuration Blended wing-body design
Retractable landing gear LED lighting Ventral fins Winglets

4 Vehicle 3-View Length 4.21 ft. Wingspan 4.63 ft. Wing Area 3.58 ft.2
Takeoff Weight 1.95 lbs. Discuss features: Unique blended canard design Retractable landing gear LED lighting

5 Dimensions Main Wing Canard Vert. Stab. Airfoil USNPS-4 Flat Plate
Sref 3.58 ft2 0.31 ft2 0.63 ft2 AR 6.0 4.0 1.5 Taper Ratio 0.6 0.5 0.4 Sweep 0 deg. 25 deg. Dihedral 3 deg. ---

6 Constraint Diagram

7 Master Design Code Automates sizing iteration process
Constraint diagram generation Propeller analysis using Goldstein’s blade-element method Motor analysis / comparison using Prop ’02 functions and MotoCalc database Battery capacity computation from mission model Sizing of Wing, Canard, and Vertical Stabilizer Weight estimation based on construction techniques and known systems weights; CG computation Automatic generation of FlatEarth input deck Single code approach ensures all disciplines “design the same aircraft” 1200+ lines of team code Also leverages 450+ lines of existing propulsion analysis codes and lines in FlatEarth aeroprediction code

8 Propulsion

9 Selected Propulsion System
Kokam 3 Cell 640mAh Li-Poly Battery Pack Kokam Super 20 Electronic Speed Controller

10 Selected Propulsion System
Graupner Speed 480 Brushed Motor 0.12 Hp at 11.1 V and 10 Amps MPJet 4.1:1 Offset Gearbox APC 11” x 4.7” Slo-Flyer Propeller

11 Graupner Speed 480 Properties

12 Propeller Properties

13 Aerodynamics

14 Selected Airfoil USNPS – 4 Flat lower surface -- easy to manufacture
Thickness suitable for servos and retracts High Clmax Low pitching moment Low Cd

15 Induced Drag Coefficient
Drag Buildup Parasite Drag Induced Drag Coefficient (ref. Raymer) Total Drag Coefficient

16 Lift Coefficient 3-D Lift Curve Slope 3-D CLmax
Full Aircraft Zero Degree AoA Lift Coefficient -FlatEarth.m (ref. Roskam) Taking into account: Wing/Body interaction Incidence Angles Downwash

17 Desired Operating Point
Polars Desired Operating Point CLmax

18 Flight Controls and Performance

19 Location of CG and AC CG AC SM=19.7% (FlatEarth) Desired ≥ 15%

20 Stabilizer Sizing with X-Plots
Design Point Static Margin = 19.7%

21 Sizing of Control Surfaces
All surfaces deflect +/- 30° 30% of chord Elevator 30% of canard b/2 10% of b/2 Rudder 40% of tail chord 20% of chord Aileron 40% of wing b/2 10% of b/2

22 Trim Diagram SM=15%

23 Flight Performance - Takeoff
Vtakeoff= 28 ft/s ttakeoff = 2.7 s Xtakeoff = 53 ft

24 Flight Performance - Turning

25 Flight Performance Endurance Climb
Need 489 mAh battery for 8 minute endurance Battery selected provides 640 mAh (best available match to required capacity) Climb Motor selected to provide adequate power for design climb angle with selected prop

26 Control Strategy Feedback yaw rate to the rudder
Expected deficiency in lateral-directional stability due to close coupling of vertical stabilizer and CG Greater potential for aircraft to enter unrecoverable dive if using pitch feedback Increase the damping of dutch roll mode from present value of to a recommended maximum value of 0.4

27 Lateral-Directional Root Locus
K = 0.95 *Negative Transfer Function

28 Block Diagram

29 Closed-Loop Pulse Response
Rudder deflected 10 deg. Rudder neutralized

30 Landing Gear, Structures and Weights

31 Landing Gear Layout Nose gear carries 8% of weight; remainder on mains
Tailstrike at 10.0 20.0 tipback angle Wingtip strike at 15.7° bank 30.0 overturn angle 1.52 ft. track between main gear 20.0 0.5 ft. 2.15 ft. 10.0

32 Foam Panels (nonstructural)
Fuselage Structure Foam Panels (nonstructural) Hollow Balsa Box Structure 3/16” sq. Balsa Stringers (4) 1/16” thick

33 Balsa Tristock Bracing
Vertical Stabilizer 3/16” x 1/4” Balsa Fin Structure, Solid Rudder 0.97 ft 0.37 ft 0.93 ft Balsa Tristock Bracing

34 Balsa Leading Edge Spar
Wing Structure Balsa Leading Edge Spar Balsa Subspar Balsa Wing Skin Blue Foam Core Balsa Trailing Edge 0.97 ft 0.03 ft 0.017 ft 0.10 ft Foam Wing Saddle

35 Bending and Torsion Results
Ultimate Root Bending Moment lbf-ft (tensile failure) Max Root Bending Moment in Turning Flight lbf-ft Computed Factor of Safety = 3.3 Maximum twist angle = -0.2 (LE down)

36 Weight Distribution

37 Weight and Balance Origin at wing root c/4
Weight (lbs.) Arm (ft.) Moment (ft.-lbs.) Airframe 0.856 -0.12 -0.10 Propulsion 0.666 0.12 0.08 Avionics 0.256 -0.98 -0.25 Landing Gear 0.155 -0.77 Miscellaneous 0.063 -0.16 -0.01 TOTAL 1.950 -0.51 Origin at wing root c/4 Nose-up moments are positive

38 V-n Diagram Ultimate Load Factor Mission Load Factor

39 Construction and Test Plan

40 Fabrication Plan Parallel construction process
Also bench test propulsion and avionics prior to installation

41 Flight Test Plan Low/Hi-speed taxi tests
Flight 1A – 1x: Unpowered glide test series Flight 2: 1st Powered Flight (outdoors) Flight 3: Envelope expansion (outdoors) Flight 4A – 4x: Final shakedown (indoors / outdoors) Flight 5: Demonstrate design mission (indoors)

42 Budget and Labor Budget Labor Team: spent $135.40 of $150 permitted
Purdue: $92.88, excluding R/C gear Remaining purchases are foam and sheet balsa Labor Team has worked 1323 hours to-date Extrapolating for remainder of semester results in $57,900 at $25/hr/person

43 Remaining Challenges Ready to Build Transportation
Compressed construction / testing schedule Pilot availability Ready to Build

44 Questions?

45 Backup charts Propulsion Structures Finance

46 Graupner Speed 480 Rated horsepower 0.1182 hp @ take-off
Motor efficiency 71% Motor constants Kv = 2450 RPM/V Kt = In-oz/amp R = Ohms Io = 1.09 Amps Rated number of cells 3 Lithium Rated Amps 10 Amps Rated voltage 8.4 V Weight 0.221 lbs Price $25.90 (Hobby Lobby)

47 Selected Gearbox Gear Ratio (available) 4.1:1 Efficiency 87% Price
$13.90 (Hobby Lobby)

48 Selected Propeller Properties
Prop (Calculated) 11 in. x 4.4 in Prop (Available) 11 in x 4.7 in RPM 5000 RPM Weight 0.113 lbs Chord 0.6 in. Airfoil of Propeller Clark-Y Price $3.09 Reynolds Number ~100,000

49 Other Propeller Options
Pitch and Diameter APC Slow-Flyer 10 x 7 10 x 4.7 11 x 6 11 x 7

50 Battery Properties Kokam 3-Cell 640 mAh Continuous Amps 9.6 A
Nominal Output 11.1 V Weight 0.119 lbs Price $31.99

51 Speed Controller Kokam Super 20 Amp Auto low voltage cutoff (lvc)
Continuous Amps Output 20A Peak output current 200A Input operating voltage 2.1 to 18V DC Weight lbs Price $33.99

52 Propulsion Parts List

53 Bending Results Max Allowable Root Bending Moment
 lbf-ft (tensile failure) Max Allowable Compressive Moment  lbf-ft Max Bending Moment in Loiter  9.18 lbf-ft Max Bending Moment in Turning Flight 9.73 lbf-ft

54 USNPS-4 Characteristics

55 USNPS-4 Characteristics

56 USNPS-4 Characteristics

57 (assumed based on historical data and absence of naceles)
Parasite Drag Buildup ,where Fuselage ,where Form Factor: Interference Factor: (assumed based on historical data and absence of naceles)

58 Parasite Drag Buildup Wings/Canards/Winglets Miscellaneous Drag
(1.02 accounts for thickness/curvature) Form Factor: Sweep correction: Interference Factor: (assumed based for mid-body, filleted wings) Miscellaneous Drag Based on historic small propeller aircraft

59 Total Drag Polar Prediction
Induced Drag Coefficient Total Drag Coefficient

60 Lift Coefficient Lift Curve Slope {

61 Break Even Point Final Aircraft Price $228.28 Profit Margin 15%
MSRP of R/C Plane $262.52 Profit Per Aircraft $34.24 Units to Break Even 1,691

62 Materials Cost

63 Avionics JR241 Servos for Rudder/Nose Wheel Steering, Elevator, Flaperons (1 ea.) JR331 Servo for Retracts Futaba GYA350 Gyro

64 Constraint Equations Climb Power Loading Stall Speed

65 Constraint Equations Climb Power Loading Stall Speed

66 Constraint Equations Sustained Turning Steady Flight


Download ppt "AAE 451 Team 3 Critical Design Review"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google