Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

From: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve ReplacementA Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(5):334-344.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "From: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve ReplacementA Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(5):334-344."— Presentation transcript:

1 From: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve ReplacementA Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(5): doi: /M Figure Legend: * Percentages do not sum to 18.3% and 81.7% for randomized and matched studies, respectively, because of rounding. Date of download: 10/15/2017 Copyright © American College of Physicians. All rights reserved.

2 From: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve ReplacementA Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(5): doi: /M Figure Legend: Knapp–Hartung random-effects OR and 95% CI for midterm all-cause mortality stratified by study design. NOTION = Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention; OR = odds ratio; PARTNER = Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves; SAVR = surgical aortic valve replacement; STACCATO = A Prospective, Randomised Trial of Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Operable Elderly Patients With Aortic Stenosis; TAVI = transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Date of download: 10/15/2017 Copyright © American College of Physicians. All rights reserved.

3 From: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve ReplacementA Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(5): doi: /M Figure Legend: * Percentages do not sum to 100% for early all-cause mortality because of rounding. Date of download: 10/15/2017 Copyright © American College of Physicians. All rights reserved.

4 From: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve ReplacementA Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(5): doi: /M Figure Legend: Summary of Knapp–Hartung random-effects OR and 95% CI for all end points, including forest plots and details of studies and participants. AKI = acute kidney injury; CV = cardiovascular; MI = myocardial infarction; NOAF = new-onset atrial fibrillation; OR = odds ratio; Pint = interaction P value; PM = pacemaker; SAVR = surgical aortic valve replacement; TAVI = transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Date of download: 10/15/2017 Copyright © American College of Physicians. All rights reserved.


Download ppt "From: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve ReplacementA Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(5):334-344."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google