1. Date of download: 10/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Modified Body Force Model for Air Flow Through Perforated Floor Tiles in Data Centers
J. Electron. Packag. 2016;138(3): doi: /
Figure Legend:
(a) MBF model without blocked edges, (b) MBF model with blocked edges, (c) MBF region, (d) perforated tile, (e) pressure drop across a tile without blocked edges, (f) pressure drop across a tile with blocked edges, and (g) MBF region height estimation based on jet behavior

2. Date of download: 10/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Modified Body Force Model for Air Flow Through Perforated Floor Tiles in Data Centers
J. Electron. Packag. 2016;138(3): doi: /
Figure Legend:
(a)–(f) Comparison of GR and MBF model with different height for momentum source specification (H), (a) computational domain (tile size = 0.61 m × 0.61 m (2 ft × 2 ft), domain height = −0.31 m (1 ft) to + 1.98 m (6 ft 6 in.), domain width = 0.91 m (3 ft)), (b) D = 2.54 cm (1 in.) GR (base case), (c) H = 2D, (d) H = 4D, (e) H = 6D, (f) excess X-momentum, along the height, and (g) MBF model, choosing Fref = 25%, estimating the empirical constants: Cref, a, and b

3. Date of download: 10/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Modified Body Force Model for Air Flow Through Perforated Floor Tiles in Data Centers
J. Electron. Packag. 2016;138(3): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Comparison of GR and MBF models for different porosities (F) (a) GR, (b) MBF, (c) GR, (d) MBF, (e) GR, (f) MBF, (g) excess X-momentum for free jet array, (h) excess X-momentum for symmetrical single jet, (i) evaluating empirical constant n, Fref = 25%, (j) F = 11%, (k) F = 25%, and (l) F = 44%

4. Date of download: 10/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Modified Body Force Model for Air Flow Through Perforated Floor Tiles in Data Centers
J. Electron. Packag. 2016;138(3): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Comparison of contours of velocity magnitude from GR and MBF models for different tile edge blockage (B) (a) GR, (b) MBF, (c) GR, (d) MBF, (e) GR, (f) MBF, (g) excess X-momentum for free jet array, (h) excess X-momentum for free jet for open area except blockage, (i) estimating empirical constant m, (j) B = 0 cm (0 in.), (k) B = 3.81 cm (1.5 in.), and (l) B = 7.62 cm (3 in.)

5. Date of download: 10/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Modified Body Force Model for Air Flow Through Perforated Floor Tiles in Data Centers
J. Electron. Packag. 2016;138(3): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Comparison of contours of GR and MBF models for small pore sizes (D) (a) D = 0.32 cm (0.125 in.), GR model, (b) D = 0.32 cm (0.125 in.), MBF model, (c) D = 0.64 cm (0.25 in.), GR model, (d) D = 0.64 cm (0.25 in.), MBF model, (e) computational domain, and (f) excess X-momentum

6. Date of download: 10/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Modified Body Force Model for Air Flow Through Perforated Floor Tiles in Data Centers
J. Electron. Packag. 2016;138(3): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Comparison of GR and MBF models for different tile thickness (T/D) (a) GR, (b) MBF, (c) GR, (d) MBF, (e) GR, (f) MBF, (g) excess X-momentum for free jet array, (h) excess X-momentum for symmetrical single jet, (i) T/D = 0 K = 32.0, (j) T/D = 1 K = 19.4, and (k) T/D = 1 K = 19.5

7. Date of download: 10/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Modified Body Force Model for Air Flow Through Perforated Floor Tiles in Data Centers
J. Electron. Packag. 2016;138(3): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Comparison of contours of GR and MBF models for AB (a) GR, (b) MBF, (c) GR, (d) MBF, (e) tile (D = 2.54 cm (1 in.), F = 25%), (f) anterior, 2.54 cm (1 in.) below tile (D = 5.08 cm (2in.), F = 50%), and (g) excess X-momentum