1. Volume 383, Issue 9927, Pages 1483-1489 (April 2014)
Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial 
Dr Femke Mol, PhD, Norah M van Mello, PhD, Annika Strandell, PhD, Karin Strandell, MD, Davor Jurkovic, MD, Jackie Ross, MD, Kurt T Barnhart, MD, Tamer M Yalcinkaya, MD, Harold R Verhoeve, PhD, Giuseppe C M Graziosi, PhD, Carolien A M Koks, PhD, Ingmar Klinte, MD, Lars Hogström, MD, Ineke C A H Janssen, PhD, Harry Kragt, PhD, Annemieke Hoek, PhD, Trudy C M Trimbos-Kemper, PhD, Frank J M Broekmans, PhD, Wim N P Willemsen, PhD, Willem M Ankum, PhD, Ben W Mol, PhD, Madelon van Wely, PhD, Fulco van der Veen, PhD, Petra J Hajenius, PhD 
The Lancet 
Volume 383, Issue 9927, Pages (April 2014)
DOI: /S (14)
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curves for time to ongoing pregnancy by natural conception
Shaded areas show 95% CIs. Median time to ongoing pregnancy by natural conception after salpingotomy was 20 months (95% CI 17–23) and after salpingectomy was 26 months (95% CI 15–37); cumulative rate of ongoing pregnancy by natural conception after 36 months was 60·7% after salpingotomy and 56·2% after salpingectomy; log-rank p=0·678; χ2=0·172 (one degree of freedom).
The Lancet  , DOI: ( /S (14) )
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 3
Meta-analysis of studies comparing salpingotomy with salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy
The Lancet  , DOI: ( /S (14) )
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 1
Trial profile
The Lancet  , DOI: ( /S (14) )
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions