1. OLLD 2017, ENOLL Krakow Patrizia Hongisto, Aalto University
Overcoming barriers to Open and User Innovation in Regional Development
OLLD 2017, ENOLL Krakow
Patrizia Hongisto, Aalto University

2. OBJECTIVE Enlarging the field through a ICT4D focus
LLs for OI Stakeholders and Users Orchestration in ICT4D
LLs for sustaining Emergent collective creativity, Reflective/Reflective practices, Relational competences
Is this possible in ICT4D?

3. QUESTIONS - I
How can LL practices attain and sustain regional development goals whether desired, or emergent?
Organizational and consumer research perspectives of sustaining emergent creation
collective interaction towards user-driven development and innovation

4. QUESTIONS - II
What are the barriers to expected outcomes: to provide a market for global participating companies, and to expand local entrepreneurial activities
Multi-level goals negotiation
Citizens as ‘working and living’ communities / individuals

5. INTERACTION AND RELATIONAL CAPABILITIES
OI in regional development – a collective of stakeholders (incl. citizens)
UI in regional development – a community, or groups, of citizens than ask, do, change
ICT4D – international development
OUI – LL – ICT4D

6. FINDINGS Organizational Barriers Systemic considerations in ICT4D
Pre-set organizational objectives
Institutional organizational limits
Divergent goals and collaboration
Practical inclusion and methodological practice
Systemic considerations in ICT4D
Mismatch between conceptual understanding of LL and practice in regional development

7. LL challenges in ICT4D
Managerial view is primary for organizational stakeholders
doubts about open-ended processes
unease with redirecting interventions, funding complexities
Relational, collaborative and reflective/reflexive actions indicate
lacking communicative resources for interactions (methodological)
lacking practice orientation (epistemological)

8. Push-Pull Negotiations
FRAMING
Push Platforms
Pull Platforms
Push-Pull Negotiations
OPI4D

9. OPI4D Use and demand co-designed Reflective Design
Looping initiative coordination
Networked, dynamic interactions
Meaning centric
Participation as shared reflective process
Practice situated focus
Entrepreneur. social sustain. innovation
Multi-layered incentives/ rewards

10. OPI4D Use and demand co-designed Reflective Design
Looping initiative coordination
Networked, dynamic interactions
Meaning centric
Participation as shared reflective process
Practice and situated focus
Entrepreneur. social sustain. innovation
Multi-layered incentives/ rewards
Demand Anticip. / Uncertain/Cocreated
Top Down Design / Emergent/ Cyclic
Centralized control/decentr./multi-layered initiatives
Procedural / Modular/Interdependent
Resource centric/People/Innovation
Restricted / open participation/negotiated
Efficiency focus/innovation/systemic
Limited reengineering/Rapid/Increm./sust.
Zero/ pos.sumExtrins/ intrinsic reward

11. CONCLUDING THOUGHTS Research in and on LLs is needed to
understand meanings and efficiency in interactions and relational realities in the practice of LLs
contribute (eg through action research) to practices in reaching reciprocal (business) opportunities
Produce valuable knowledge building practices for a future where work, ‘a job’, either in developed or undeveloped environments, may have a changed meaning.
OPI4D is one way to shape this knowledge.

12. THANK YOU patrizia.hongisto@aalto.fi