1. PRESENTATION OF THE WEEK
WORK SESSION 1
PRESENTATION OF THE WEEK
AIMS AND PLANNING OF M5
20 March 2017

2. OBJECTIVES of M5
To reach to an agreement about the online Course Guidelines/Introduction, having worked in a cooperative way and providing added value to the last version of the document.
To reach to an agreement about every section of the course lessons, having worked in a cooperative way and providing added value to their last version.
To obtain direct knowledge about the teaching practice evaluation carried out in Bolzano.
To distribute tasks and responsibilities until July 2017 in order to assure the EOSLATP project objectives, previewing M6 and final Congress objectives and organization.
To evaluate the working process and results since January 2017 related to Local teams and M5 development.

3. OBJECTIVE 2
To reach to an agreement about the COURSE LESSONS, having worked in a cooperative way and providing added value to their last version:
WS 3-4 : Presentation and analysis of the lessons addressed by partners (8).
WS 4-9: Common analysis and agreement on the rest of the lessons (7)

4. OBJECTIVE 3
To obtain direct knowledge about the teaching practice evaluation carried out in Bolzano:
Previous presentation by Ursula Pulyer.
School visit.
Round table.

5. OBJECTIVE 4
To distribute tasks and responsabilities until July 2017 in order to ensure the EOSLATP project objectives, previewing M6 and final Congress objectives and organization.
WS 12 &15:
Presentation of M6 Basque Country and summer course.
Partners´future tasks

6. OBJECTIVE 5
To evaluate the working process and results since January 2017 related to Local teams and M5 development.
WS 11, 13, 14:
Evaluation of M5
By partners
By external observer.
Project disemination and impact activities

7. OBJECTIVE 6
To acquire knowledge about School Leadership evaluation last proposals:
Lecture by Prof. Stefan Brauckmann, Uni Klagenfurt
School leadership under the microscope - do they really know what they are doing ?”

8. Organization Working Sessions by non country groups:
Group A
Group B
PMT
Dalia
José
Martin
Nekane
Aurel
Lacri
Leonor
Rosanna
Paul
Special role
Petros
External Observer
Paul Cammack:
Ensure coherence between groups. Advice on timeing management. Clarify concepts.
Petros Pashiardis:
Evaluates if progress is made. Gives advise to improve.
Working Sessions by country groups. 9

9. Working groups´tasks:
To guaranty that all contributions are operational by providing an ALTERNATIVE TEXT.
To decide who will be in charge of jotting down the conclusions of the group about: .
the Guidelines/Introduction
The lessons.
To communicate them to be approved by SC.

10. Special roles Paul Cammack Petros Pashiardis
Promoting both groups’ work and guarantying the coherence and linguistic accurateness of the contents.
Observation work and making improvement proposals about contents and working organization during the working sessions or at the end of the day.
Making contributions and proposals about criteria, strategies, dynamics, scientific references… for the Scientific Committee to take decisions.

11. COURSE CHARACTERISTICS:
Alignment of the online course with characteristics of the TP eval. Guide :
“FORMATIVE APPROACH.
EUROPEAN DIMENSION,
ADAPTABLE.
NOT PRESCRIPTIVE.
EASY TO USE,
BASED ON RESEARCH AND THEORY”

12. ORIGINS 1.- APPLICATION FORM (pg. 42,43) Output Description:
An online course will be designed using the Moodle platform.
This course will be addressed to inspectors, directors or other kind of agents…
The course will be consistent with O4 intellectual output:
It will be made up of several lessons about the purpose of the evaluation,
how to do, with what resources, according to what criteria, etc.
It will contain text-files, videos, quizzes, etc.
Each organization will decide on who should take this course and what other groups might be interested on.
It will be translated into the official languages of partners for further dissemination.
Pg. 28: From 01 to translation into local languages at local/regional level.
Pg. 57: It is the intention of all the partners to put into practice the Moodle course contents during the following years,
Pg.66: SUSTAINABILITY Voluntary follow-up activities for partners during 2018.

13. ORIGINS 2.- SCHEDULE: PMT´s coop PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM
O5/A1
PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM
Elaboration the draft of the TRAINING COURSE FOR SCHOOLS LEADERS on Teacher’ assessment process (moodle)
O5/A2
LOCAL TEAM (PROVINCIA AUTONOMA DI BOLZANO )
Revision the draft of the TRAINING COURSE FOR SCHOOLS LEADERS on Teacher’ assessment process (moodle) M5
SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE (PROVINCIA AUTONOMA DI BOLZANO )
Analysis of a TRAINING COURSE FOR SCHOOLS LEADERS on Teacher’ assessment process Guide (moodle)
Visits and case studies
O5/A3
LOCAL TEAM ((PROVINCIA AUTONOMA DI BOLZANO )
Revision of a TRAINING COURSE FOR SCHOOLS LEADERS on Teacher’ assessment process (Moodle).
O5/A4
Uploading the TRAINING COURSE FOR SCHOOLS LEADERS on Teacher’ assessment process in a public platform with free access in order to be used (Moodle) by the partners (each Local Team)
PMT´s coop

14. Course Practicalities by each partner:
SL’s / INSPECTORS’ TRAINING (Initial / in-service / both)
Legislation, planification…
School Evaluation.
Living together.
TP evaluation.
Communit. Involv.
Etc.
Hours
Credits
Calendar
It can be used as a course itself, or inserted as a part of another course/training for SLs, Inspectors or… (variable number of hours / credits...),
It is open to be modified by local administrators.
The same or different platform could be used. This course proposal that can be imported (zipped) by partners.

15. ONLINE COURSE GUIDELINES/INTRODUCTION
WORK SESSION 2
ONLINE COURSE GUIDELINES/INTRODUCTION
16 January 2017

16. 1. INTRODUCTION/ GUIDELINES Something to change? To add? To remove?
Both teams will work this section for 45 minutes.
Group A- part of the text
Group B- the rest of it.
Decisions or proposals must be written by the secretary of each group with an ALTERNATIVE TEXT or RATIFICATION OF THE ORIGINAL TEXT in the USB unit.
Proposals are presented to the SC. ( 25 minutes each group),
After SC approval, the PMT collects the agreements.

17. WORK SESSION 3 & 4
LESSONS ANALYSIS.
16 January 2017

18. Something to change? To add? To remove?
LESSONS ANALYSIS
Something to change? To add? To remove?
Agreements .
The partners in charge of the lesson will present it to the SC:
Presentation (20’).
If he/she considers it applicable and agrees with grid and tasks.
If there is any modification suggested, accompanied by an ALTERNATIVE TEXT. (15’)
Approval of the contents as a minimum unit for the lesson.

19. LESSONS ANALYSIS
5.- Other contributions from partners to adequate the lesson to his/her educational system (they will have to fulfil four conditions):
Concrete proposal with alternative written text (avoiding “consult this article, webpage…”)
Respect the main characteristics of the TP Eval. Guide: Formative Approach, Adaptable, Non Prescriptive, Easy To Use, European Dimension, Based on Theory and Research.
Those contributions will be collected in one or more appendices of the lesson to be applicable in the proposer´s country to be kept as complementary to the original one. so that they can be implemented by the course Local administrator. The SC allows the adaptation to proposer’s educational system as far as the course main goals and characteristics are aligned with the Teaching Practice Evaluation Guide.
The partner who suggests these contributions will be in charge of designing the appendix of the lesson to be presented in WS 10.

20. LESSONS ANALYSIS
This online course is a proposal of minimums that makes possible:
The local administrator could personalize/customize the course to his/her local characteristics
The course length can be adapted to local circumstances: 3,6 months…

21. ADAPTABLE COURSE: Local needs
The course trusts EOSLATP Local Administrators who can customize, personalize it under certain conditions.
Examples:
L. administrator can substitute or add tasks and lessons if: Local authors experts on… // TV programs related to topic // Round tables // Recent trainig and lectures on the topic… METAEVALUATION instead of PEER EVALUATION.
What are the conditions?
1.- 5 characteristics of the TP evaluation.
2.- Fullfillment of the General and Specific Objectives of the Course.
As a result:
1.- Lessons with minimums and models of tasks + Appendices by Country.
2.- Framework: Grid, etc.

22. WORK SESSION 5-9 LESSONS ANALYSIS.
17 January 2017

23. Something to change? To add? To remove?
REST OF THE LESSONS:
Something to change? To add? To remove?
WORK BY COUNTRIES:
Do you agree with the proposal as a minimum unit for that lesson, in spite of minor changes related to language or style?
Any changes suggested?
Plenary: we will share the decisions and proposals.

24. WORK SESSION 10
PERSONAL WORK ON LESSONS PROPOSALS BY COUNTRY: APPENDICES OF THE LESSONS.

25. DISEMINATION AND IMPACT.
WORK SESSION 11
DISEMINATION AND IMPACT.

26. Project outputs Impact and contents dissemination:
WEB PAGE.
MOODLE PLATFORM.

27. CHANNELS FOR IMPACT AND DISSEMINATION:
Compromise taken in Application Form to Spanish National Agency:
For Dissemination.
For Impact / Evaluation.
Magic word: EOSLATP
Moodle Platform for private project documents
Web site for wide dissemination contents.

28. DISSEMINATION
Let´s go to the moodle platform in order to see the activities that have to be carried out in this duty.
Doubts related to the uploading of these activities, please contact Martin and Nekane.

29. WORK SESSION 12
M6 BASQUE COUNTRY.

30. 2017 JULY 2-7: MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY LUNCH
Work session 1:
Aims of the week
Summary of the project (30’?)
Report BC about dissemination activities, impact, work organization…
Report Bolzano
Work session 3:
Report Cumbria
Report Portugal
Work session 4:
Evaluation of the outputs
Work session 5:
Evaluation of the project: application form objectives, working procedures, share of responsibilities, work dynamics…
Future activities
SUMMER COURSE
LUNCH
FAREWELL LUNCH
Work session 2:
Report Lithuania
Report Romania
Pending tasks***
Leisure activity
GALA DINNER?

31. REPORTS:
Each partner explains the dissemination and implementation activities, impact obtained, work organization, etc.
***PENDING TASKS:
Write down all the dissemination activities in the Moodle platform
Report about the impact activities (partners will have time to write down their own reports)
Fulfil the time control sheets
Present expenses reports (each partner)
Revise all the project documentation (reports, certificates…)
Prepare the summer course

32. SUMMER COURSE TIMETABLE:

33. WEEK SATISFACTION MARKS.
WORK SESSION 13
WEEK SATISFACTION MARKS.
17 January 2017

34. EVALUATION BY EXTERNAL OBSERVER.
WORK SESSION 14
EVALUATION BY EXTERNAL OBSERVER.
17 January 2017

35. WORK SESSION 15 PARTNERS FUTURE TASKS.
17 January 2017

36. PARTNERS TASKS:
SUMMER COURSE presentation and lectures preparation.
Dissemination and Impact activities.
PMT:
Revision of the Online Course.
Web page.
Preparation of the M6