1. Land Empires vs. Maritime Empires

2. Land Empires Control of huge lands & people
Requires large military investment
Vulnerable to land & sea routes
Requires massive infrastructure investment
Superior technology used to suppress natives
Expanded contact with imperial subjects
Dependence on native collaborators

3. Maritime Empires Control of trade via limited ports
Production & shipment of commodities
Colonization of limited territory
Limited military confrontations & investments
Exploitation of improved maritime technology
Expanded exploration & control of distance areas
Dependence on native collaborators

6. Comparing Empires
Most maintained Absolutist rule (exception England and the Netherlands)
All maintained and extended territories through gunpowder weaponry
All dominated trade routes and gained revenue through protectionism
Most were dominated by religion and were conflicted by religious pluralism
Sugar, Spice and slave trade were fundamental to their economy.
All will establish a policy of infrastructure building and religious zeal.
All will contend with management of a multiethnic empire

7. Comparing Empires 1450-1750 Maritime were predominantly Christian
Some were privately invested
Maritime empires were exploitative and competitive
“gunpowder” empires were ruled through Islamic forces
Overland Empires lost monopoly of Indian Ocean trade after Battle of Lepanto
Interaction with the “West” was generally through ports established by European interests (Calicut, Goa, Aden)
By 17th century many Islamic Empires became fundamentally more conservative and increasingly more insular contributing to their declining commercial role.

8. Examples Can you name examples of each type of empire?
Why is maritime technology and empire building more influential than land-based empire building?
What were some components of success of both? Failure of both?

9. Today’s Activity Directions:
Read documents about the Coffeehouse and the Evolution of its Story.
How would you describe coffeehouses and their role in society?  Why were they feared by governments, but celebrated by individuals?  What elements do you recognize in 17th century Middle Eastern coffeehouses from European history and our contemporary society?
Develop a comp thesis (one land one sea) on back board

12. One land, one sea
From in both the Ottoman Empire and Spain, rulers exercised divine right absolute power over the masses, both developed large multi-ethnic empires through their military (gunpowder technologies0, however Spain would establish a large overseas colonial Empire in the Americas while the Ottoman would extend primarily overland in SW Asia and Eastern Europe
IN both the Russians and English would ethnocentrically contribute to the slaughter of native populations, utilize the fur trade to extract this lucrative global commodity, however, the Russian’s would not embrace fully the ideas of the “West” ( science, enlightenment) while the coffeehouses of England would be a penny education for science and technology
From the Mughal and France would both sponsor large commodity exchanges of textiles and agricultural products, however, the Mughal(under Akbar) would be far more religiously tolerant than France (under Louis XIV) and the Mughal would foster exports from European ports like Goa and Calicut while France would utilize the trading posts in the Atlantic in New France and NE Americas
From both Portugal and the Kongo were engaging in reciprocal trading relations of manufactured products (Portuguese firearms and Rum for African slaves for Portuguese sugar plantations in Brazil), both had diplomats in their respective courts (Ndonga and Lisbon) however, the Portuguese were not interested in converting to local African cultures while African Monarchs like Queen Ndzinga and King Alfonso would convert to Christianity (Antonianism)