1. Wavelet-Based Spectrum Analysis of Sacral Skin Blood Flow Response to Alternating Pressure 
Yih-Kuen Jan, PhD, PT, David M. Brienza, PhD, Mary Jo Geyer, PhD, PT, Patricia Karg, MS 
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
DOI: /j.apmr
Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
A comparison of mean skin temperature during alternating pressure and constant loading NOTE. Values are mean ± standard error (SE).
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2
A comparison of relative changes of mean skin temperature during alternating pressure and constant loading. NOTE. Values are mean ± SE.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

4. Fig 3
A comparison of mean SBF during baseline, loading, and recovery periods under alternating pressure and constant loading. NOTE. Values are mean ± SE. *P<.01.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

5. Fig 4
A comparison of mean SBF during 4 cycles of alternating pressure and constant loading. NOTE. Values are mean ± SE.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

6. Fig 5
A comparison of relative changes of SBF (ie, blood flow responses are normalized to baseline blood flow) during 4 cycles of alternating pressure and constant loading. NOTE. Values are mean ± SE.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

7. Fig 6
A comparison of normalized power of metabolic frequency band during alternating pressure and constant loading.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

8. Fig 7
A comparison of normalized power of neurogenic frequency band during alternating pressure and constant loading.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

9. Fig 8
A comparison of normalized power of myogenic frequency band during alternating pressure and constant loading.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions