Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Suspension deflection comparison. Item (1) (2) (3) Control Method

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Suspension deflection comparison. Item (1) (2) (3) Control Method"— Presentation transcript:

1 Simulation (The tested rough road is effectively improved by the SVM-LQR )
Suspension deflection comparison. Item (1) (2) (3) Control Method Passive (Have not awarded controlling) LQR SVM-LQR RMS Suspension Deflection (m) (improvement %) 0.0173 (0%) 0.0158  (8.67%) 0.0095   (45.09%) Maximum Suspension Deflection (m) (improvement %) 0.0498 0.0452   (9.24%) 0.0264   (46.99%) Suspension acceleration comparison RMS Suspension Acceleration (improvement %) 1.1853 1.0824  (8.68%) 0.6041   (49.03%) Maximum Suspension Acceleration (improvement %) 4.8470 4.5660   (5.80%) 3.2052   (33.87%) Tire-ground contact comparison RMS Tire-Ground Contact (m) (improvement %) 0.0021 0.0019  (9.52%) 0.0012   (42.86%) Maximum 0.0134 0.0129   (3.73%) 0.0107   (20.15%)


Download ppt "Suspension deflection comparison. Item (1) (2) (3) Control Method"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google