Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

COURAGE What Should the Impact of the COURAGE Trial

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "COURAGE What Should the Impact of the COURAGE Trial"— Presentation transcript:

1 COURAGE What Should the Impact of the COURAGE Trial
Be on Interventional Cardiology?: Optimal Medical Therapy First William S. Weintraub, MD Chief of Cardiology Christiana Care Health System Professor of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University

2 William S. Weintraub, MD DISCLOSURES Consulting Fees
Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardionet, Eli Lilly and Company, Humana, sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC Grants/Contracted Research Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Abbott Vascular, Otsuka America, Inc., sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC Other Bayer AG - Expert witness Pfizer - Expert witness

3 Funding/Disclosures COURAGE Funding
Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Office of Research and Development Canadian Institutes of Health Research Merck, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Fujisawa, Kos Pharmaceuticals, Datascope, Astra-Zeneca, Key Pharmaceutical, Sanofi-Aventis, First Horizon, GE Healthcare; all industrial funds were unrestricted and payable to the DVA CSP; no direct industry involvement in the trial design, conduct or analysis Presenter Disclosures Grants: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, Otsuka, CVT, Merck, Pfizer Consultant: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, Otsuka, CVT, Glaxo Smith Klein, Lilly, Indigo

4 Stable CAD: PCI vs Conservative Medical Management
Meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials; N = 2,950 Favors PCI Favors Medical Management Death Cardiac death or MI Nonfatal MI CABG PCI P 0.68 0.28 0.12 0.82 0.34 1 2 Risk ratio (95% Cl) Katritsis DG et al. Circulation. 2005;111:

5 Patient Expectations About Elective PCI
52 consecutive patients scheduled for first elective PCI completed semi-structured questionnaire prospectively Do you think the angioplasty will prevent a heart attack? Yes 75% Do you think the angioplasty will help you live longer? 71% Holmboe et al. J Gen Intern Med 2000;15:632.

6 Most PCIs are Emergent? Elective Urgent Emergent NY State1 87% --- 13%
NCDR2 49% 36% 15% APPROACH3 26% 54% 19% BCIS4 56% 44% 1Am J Cardiol 2006;98: Based on 82,140 cases in NY State Angioplasty Registry 2ACC National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Based on 610,436 cases. 3APPROACH Registry, Province of Alberta, Based on 4,922 cases. 4UK 2005 PCI Audit Data, British Cardiovascular Intervention Society, Based on ,142 cases.

7 BARI COURAGE 25,200 Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiogram 35,539 Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiogram 12,530 (50%) 18,360 (52%) Clinically Eligible Clinically Eligible 67% Exclusion Criteria 86% Exclusion Criteria Eligible for Both CABG and PTCA 4,110 3,071 Eligible for Both OMT and PCI Refused Randomization Refused Randomization 55% 26% 1,829 (7%) 2,287 (6.4%) Enrolled and Randomized Enrolled and Randomized CABG PTCA OMT OMT + PCI 914 915 1,138 1,149 NEJM 1996:335:217 NEJM 2007;356:1503

8 COURAGE Enrolled Low Risk Patients?
DM 34% Dyslipidemia 71 % HTN 67% Smoker 29% Prior MI 39% Prior Revasc 26% Angina 88% Prox LAD 34% MVD 70% Multiple defects 67% Event rate/yr 4%

9 Optimal Medical Therapy
Pharmacologic Anti-platelet: aspirin; clopidogrel in accordance with established practice standards Statin: simvastatin ± ezetimibe or ER niacin ACE Inhibitor or ARB: lisinopril or losartan Beta-blocker: long-acting metoprolol Calcium channel blocker: amlodipine Nitrate: isosorbide 5-mononitrate Lifestyle Smoking cessation Exercise program Nutrition counseling Weight control The medical therapy in the COURAGE Trial is aggressive and multifaceted and conforms to the most recent ACC/AHA Treatment Guidelines. It consists of an individualized lifestyle interventions: diet, weight loss, smoking cessation/relapse prevention, and regular exercise routine, as well as of the aggressive use of the following pharmacologic agents. A ll patients in both arms received : anti-thrombotic therapy with aspirin (or clopidogrel 75 mg/day, if aspirin allergy was present). Additionally, clopidogrel plus aspirin use evolved as an accepted standard for PCI management during the course of the study, including clopidogrel loading prior to (or during) PCI. Medical anti-ischemic therapy in both arms included long-acting metoprolol, amlodipine, and isosorbide 5-mononitrate, alone or in combination. Post-MI patients received standard secondary prevention with beta-blockers (unless contraindicated) and an lisinopril or, for those unable to take lisinopril, losartan for left ventricular ejection fraction <40% or anterior MI location. The centerpiece of medical therapy was aggressive LDL lowering with a target of mg/dL ( mmol/L) using up to 80 mg of simvastatin daily, alone or in combination with ezetimibe, in conformity with established. Patients with high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol <40 mg/dL (1.04 mmol/L) were treated with extended release niacin (Niaspan). Discussion: Drug-eluting stents were not approved for clinical use until very late during patient accrual and, subsequently, few patients received these intracoronary devices. Applied to Both Arms by Protocol and Case-Managed

10 OMT not Achievable in Real World?
♥ OMT with risk factor control is our responsibility ♥ PCI does not relieve us of that responsibility ♥ How are you going to assure DAPT compliance?

11 Long-Term Improvement in Treatment Targets (Group Median ± SE Data)
Baseline 60 Months PCI +OMT OMT SBP 131 ± 0.77 130 ± 0.66 124 ± 0.81 122 ± 0.92 DBP 74 ± 0.33 70 ± 0.81 70 ± 0.65 Total Cholesterol mg/dL 172 ± 1.37 177 ± 1.41 143 ± 1.74 140 ± 1.64 LDL mg/dL 100 ± 1.17 102 ± 1.22 71 ± 1.33 72 ± 1.21 HDL mg/dL 39 ± 0.39 39 ± 0.37 41 ± 0.67 41 ± 0.75 TG mg/dL 143 ± 2.96 149 ± 3.03 123 ± 4.13 131 ± 4.70 BMI Kg/M² 28.7 ± 0.18 28.9 ± 0.17 29.2 ± 0.34 29.5 ± 0.31 Moderate Activity (5x/week) 25% 42% 36%

12 Poor Quality PCI in VA Centers?
Angiographic Success by Health Care System US-VA US-nonVA Canada N Success All Segments 719 94% 282 91% 646 POBA segments 94 81% 39 77% 57 72% Stented segments 625 96% 243 93% 589

13 Incomplete Revascularization?
♥ Similar to PCI results in MASS II and the NY State Registry ♥ CABG did not decrease events in EAST, BARI and ARTS despite more complete revascularization

14 Drug-Eluting Stents Were Not Used
♥ ASA, Statins, BB, ACEi decrease Death/MI ♥ Stents decrease TVR, not Death/MI ♥ DES would have decreased TVR, but not Death/MI ♥ DES would decrease transient recurrent angina due to restenosis

15 Cross-over problem, Less TVR with PCI?
Strategy trial, not PCI vs Medical Therapy 16.5% of OMT patients crossed-over by 11 mo, 16.5% between month 11 and 7 years, 2.75%/year after year 1 Repeat revascularization: PCI, 228; OMT, 348 Total revascularization: PCI, 1331; OMT, 348

16 Survival Free of Death from Any Cause and Myocardial Infarction
Number at Risk Medical Therapy PCI Years 1 2 3 4 5 6 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 PCI + OMT Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT) Hazard ratio: 1.05 95% CI ( ) P = 0.62 7 ♥ Make it a non-inferiority design? ♥ Add 2000 or more patients? ♥ The events curves are still superimposed

17 Results Due to Periprocedural MI?
♥ Definition: 1. CK-MB 3x ULN or troponin 5 x ULN 2. Signs or symptoms of ischemia ♥ Death and MI: HR 1.05 ( ); p = 0.62 ♥ Exclude periprocedural MI: HR 0.9 ( );p = 0.29

18 Overall Survival PCI + OMT OMT Hazard ratio: 0.87 95% CI (0.65-1.16)
1.0 0.9 OMT 0.8 Hazard ratio: 0.87 95% CI ( ) P = 0.38 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Years Number at Risk Medical Therapy PCI

19 Freedom From Hospitalization for ACS
1.0 OMT 0.9 PCI + OMT 0.8 0.7 Hazard ratio: 1.07 95% CI ( ) P = 0.56 0.6 0.5 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Years Number at Risk Medical Therapy PCI

20 Freedom From Myocardial Infarction
OMT 1.0 0.9 PCI + OMT 0.8 0.7 Hazard ratio: 1.13 95% CI ( ) P = 0.33 0.6 0.5 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Years Number at Risk Medical Therapy PCI

21 Baseline Characteristics Medical Therapy Better
Subgroup Analyses Baseline Characteristics Hazard Ratio (95% Cl) PCI Medical Therapy Overall ( ) Sex Male ( ) Female ( ) Age > ( ) ≤ ( ) Race White ( ) Not White ( ) Health Care System Canadian ( ) U.S. Non-VA ( ) U.S. VA ( ) 0.25 0.50 1.00 1.50 1.75 2.00 PCI Better Medical Therapy Better

22 Baseline Characteristics Medical Therapy Better
Subgroup Analyses Baseline Characteristics Hazard Ratio (95% Cl) PCI Medical Therapy Myocardial Infarction Yes ( ) No ( ) Extent of CAD Multi-vessel disease 1.10 ( ) Single-vessel disease 1.00 ( ) Diabetes Yes ( ) No ( ) Angina CCS 0-I ( ) CCS II-III ( ) Ejection Fraction ≤ 50% ( ) > 50% ( ) Previous CABG No ( ) Yes ( ) 0.25 0.50 1.00 1.50 1.75 2.00 PCI Better Medical Therapy Better

23 PCI Better in Non-VA U.S. Population?
If this conclusion from subgroup analysis is to be applied to COURAGE, then OMT is preferred in men, non-diabetics, single vessel disease, and in the absence of prior MI. No statistically significant interactions.

24 Can we define a subgroup with benefit?
Subgroup Analyses Can we define a subgroup with benefit? Stay tuned!

25 SAQ Data – Angina Frequency
Follow-up PCI+OMT OMT Only Unadjusted P Value Baseline 68 69 0.20 1 Month 82 76 < 3 Months 85 80 6 Months 87 83 0.0001 12 Months 84 0.003 24 Months 89 86 0.002 36 Months 88 0.37

26 SAQ Data – Angina Frequency Clinically Significant Improvement
Follow-up PCI+OMT OMT Only Unadjusted P Value 1 Month 47% 40% 0.004 3 Months 50% 44% 0.010 6 Months 52% 46% 0.016 12 Months 54% 0.012 24 Months 57% 0.045 36 Months 39% 30% 0.0002 NNT 12.5 for 1 to improve at 6 months Wyrwich KW et al. Clinically important differences in health status for patients with heart disease: an expert consensus panel report. Am Heart J 2004;147

27 Clinically Significant Improvement
SAQ Data – Angina Frequency Tercile Scores (Mean Interaction P=0.008, Clinically Significant Improvement Interaction P<0.0001) PCI + OMT OMT Clinically Significant Improvement Tercile Follow-up Mean P Value PCI+OMT 1st Baseline 35 0.75 3 months 74 65 0.0004 80% 73% 0.092 6 months 78 72 0.023 85% 81% 0.26 12 months 79 75 0.090 86% 84% 0.56 36 months 83 82 0.94 92% 88% 0.14 2nd 71 0.18 86 < 61% 50% 0.009 87 0.002 64% 56% 0.042 88 85 67% 58% 0.037 89 0.28 71% 0.11 3rd 97 0.61 91 90 0.67 92 0.015 93 0.022 94 0.31

28 Lifetime QALY

29 Conclusions COURAGE did not show that PCI as an initial management strategy prevents events COURAGE did show that PCI improves symptoms About 1/3 of patients crossed over at median time of 10 months. COURAGE suggests that as an initial management strategy optimal medical therapy is safe, and that PCI can be deferred or avoided


Download ppt "COURAGE What Should the Impact of the COURAGE Trial"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google