1. Argument Culture and Ethics
Shima Al-Mubarak
Fatmah Al-Sakran

2. Outline
Culture and Argument * Multicultural Argument * Cultural Argument Patterns * Culture and Values * Developing Cultural Argument Competence

3. What is a culture?

4. Multicultural Argument
Argument styles:
* Pro-con argument
* Collaborative argument

5. We should think about the styles depends on cultural and background and express their way of life . * A recent study done in USA by different students came from different backgrounds like : African American

6. Cultural Argument Patterns
Deductive, inductive, abductive and Narrative. * Deductive: State a claim or position followed by evidence and the reasoning that usually underlying. * Inductive : Using different examples to support his perspectives and the general claim that can be stated at either the beginning or the end. *Abductive: Speakers share their way of thinking and work together to attain a conclusion by comparing their skills . *Narrative: using stories in their argument to get the conclusion .

7. Culture and Value
Culture is assign for different levels of importance to different value.
1- culture value possession.
2-culture value people.
3- culture value relationship.
4- culture value individualism.

8. Culture and Value
There are kinds of values such as : *Progress and change value * Tradition value

9. Developing Cultural Argument Competence
* An important theme of higher education * The potential to play an important responsibility in creating relationships.

10. Developing Cultural Argument Competence
Definition of competence in intercultural argument
the seven behavioral characteristics of the intercultural communication.

11. 1- display of respect 2- argument interaction posture 3- orientation to knowledge 4- empathy 5- role behaviors 6- interaction management 7- tolerance of ambiguity

12. Outline Ethics And Argumentation - Strengthening the Individual
- Strengthening the Community
Developing An Ethical Code
- Ethics for Arguers
- Ethics for Recipients

13. Ethics and argumentation
Definition of ethics .
Medical doctors live by Hippocratic Oath
Code professionals standards for the precise of public relations

14. Strengthening the Individual
Providing recipients with opportunities to make free choices.
Helping recipients become better people in their community

15. Strengthening the individual
Types of relationships between argier and recipient :
1- is that of the seducer who seeks to win covertly though charm of deceit.
2- is that of lover

16. Strengthening the Community
Looking for prospects to help folks live and work together more excellently.
Seeking ways of justifiably sharing remedies
Looking to deliver a means for listeners to make problematic decision.

17. Developing an ethical code
Why should arguers have a clear understanding of arguments ?
Recipient should have a clear understanding of how arguments can be critically evaluated

18. Ethics for arguers
1- Arguers should be accountable and responsible of their arguments.
2- arguers should promote significant choice.
3- arguers should promoter positive relationships with their audiences

19. Ethics for Recipients
Recipients should be aware of attempts to influence
Receivers should be informed
Recipients should be aware of their own biases .
Recipients should understand how fallacies persuade.