Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBranden Bond Modified over 6 years ago
1
Workplace Violence: An Empirical Study on Hospitality Industry Employees
Erdal ARSLAN & Meryem Akoğlan KOZAK Graduate School of Social Sciences Abstract The past 10 years have witnessed a growing interest in studies of violence in the field of service industry though there are not sufficient study conduct on workplace violence in the context of hospitality industry. The incident of workplace violence are been raised by years particularly in the hospitality industry. This study was conducted to reveal the experience of workplace violence of hospitality industry employees from Eskişehir and Antalya region and to investigate the effects of violence on their psychological state. Current study presents the results of a study of 468 hotel employees and results was assessed in this context. The prevalence of workplace violence was almost fifty percent and the most common types were verbal and mobbing. Perpetrator of physical, verbal, psychological violence were mostly male whereas females were the perpetrator of sexual violence. Psychological state of employees that exposed to violence were found deteriorate in terms of depression, anxiety and stress and employees seemed not worried about become a victim of workplace violence. Keywords: hospitality, employees, workplace violence, Results Table 1: Demographics and Work Characteristics of Study Participants Table 2: Characteristics of exposure to workplace violence Characteristics N % Age 18-29 235 50,2 Type of hotel Apart hotel 6 1,3 30-39 149 31,8 3-star 156 33,3 40-49 65 13,9 4-star 81 17,3 >=50 19 4,1 5-star 225 48,1 Gender Male 263 56,2 Departmant Front office 98 20,9 Female 205 43,8 Service 109 23,3 Marital status Married 242 51,7 Housekeeping 126 26,9 Guest relations 17 3,6 Single 226 48,3 Education Primary/Sec. school 113 24,1 Kitchen 55 11,8 Accounting 26 5,6 High school 189 40,4 Other 37 7,9 University 166 35,5 Monthly income <= 950 40 8,5 Work duration in industry (as year) 1-5 252 53,8 351 75,0 6-10 61 13,0 11-15 29 6,2 >=2501 16 3,4 >=16 31 6,6 Position General manager 13 2,8 Work duration in hotel (as year) < 1 110 23,5 Departmental Manager 18 3,8 314 67,1 32 6,8 Department Chief 7 1,5 Chief 54 11,5 16 ve + 5 1,1 Employee 354 75,6 Work status Permanent 407 87,0 City Eskişehir 292 62,4 Seasonal Antalya 176 37,6 Physical violence Mobbing Verbal violence Sexual violence N % Frequency of exposuring to violence Constantly 1 3,4 8 11,1 10 10,5 6,7 Sometimes 9 31,0 55 76,4 66 69,5 4 28,7 Once 19 65,5 12,5 20,0 66,7 Person who perpetrate to violence Customer 21 29,2 26 27,4 53,3 Executive colleague 7 24,1 48 57,9 3 Subworker colleague 10,3 - Counterpart colleague 5 17,2 4,2 15 15,9 20,8 Other 15,8 20,3 Gender of violence perpetrator Male 38 52,8 62 65,3 6 40,0 Female 34,5 14 14,7 60,0 Male and female 28,4 Sum-type of violence that employee exposed 29 6,2 72 15,4 95 3,2 Total 211 employees Introduction Violence in the workplace is a significant occupational hazard and public health problem which increasing by degrees, particularly in service industries such as hospitality. In the past ten years a growing body of literature has examined in the extent of workplace violence and the literature suggests that violence can no longer be seen as an individual issue but must be viewed in terms of a structural problem requiring action at an organisational level (ILO, 2001). Workplace violence has defined as “violent acts, including physical assaults and threats of assault, directed toward persons at work or on duty’’ (NIOSH, 1996, p.1). Workplace violence ranges lt ranges from psychologic and verbal abuse to physical assaults and even sexual harassment. Individual, environmental, biological, psychologic, organizational and working climate factors have significant influence on workplace violence (Spector et al, 2007). Particularly, in hospitality industries where human relations approaches is indispensable, violence may occur and employees may became to a victim by colleague or client. Beside, since hotels provides intense service and seasonality form of the industry may cause to violence. Experiencing any type of workplace violence can deteriorate psychologic states such as depression, anxiety and stress of victim in addition, being expose to violence and working insecure workplace may reduce job satisfaction of the employees (Ashford et al., 1989). Workplace violence studies in the literature that conducted in the hospitality industry have highly addressed to the mobbing and other type of workplace violence such as physical, verbal and sexual remained a matter of concern. For this purpose, the incident of workplace violence dealt with an integrative approach in other words the most cited four types of violence such as physical, psychological, verbal and sexual perpetration against employees were basic research questions of this study. In addition to that research question this study aims to answer fallowing questions: What are the characteristics of workplace violence that employees exposed in the workplace? What are the differences among being exposed to violence and demographical characteristics? Are there any differences among being exposed and not exposed to violence in terms of depression, anxiety and stress. Are there any differences among exposed and not exposed to violence in terms of degree of worry. Results Table 4: T-Test summary table for depression, anxiety and stress levels of participants exposed and not exposed to violence T Test Statistics 𝑫𝒆𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑨𝒏𝒙𝒊𝒆𝒕𝒚 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝑻𝒚𝒑𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝑽𝒊𝒐𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝑵 𝑿 𝑺 𝑺𝒅 𝒕 𝒑 𝑷𝒉𝒚𝒔𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒍 𝑬𝒙𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒆𝒅 29 2,47 1,12 466 3,13 .002 2,16 1,19 2,11 .035 2,61 1,09 1,3 .186 𝑵𝒐𝒕 𝒆𝒙𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒆𝒅 439 1,97 ,81 1,84 ,76 2,38 ,89 𝑴𝒐𝒃𝒃𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑬𝒙𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒅 72 2,31 ,82 3,41 .001 2,02 ,84 1,87 .061 2,58 ,95 1,71 .087 396 1,94 1,08 ,79 2,36 ,90 𝑽𝒆𝒓𝒃𝒂𝒍 95 2,42 5,63 .000 2,14 ,88 3,96 2,71 ,94 3,90 373 1,89 1,78 𝑺𝒆𝒙𝒖𝒂𝒍 15 2,73 3,43 1,10 3,01 .003 2,83 1,14 1,91 .056 453 ,83 ,78 Methods This study was carried out in Eskişehir and Antalya, Turkey from December 20, 2015 to January 25,2016 Workplace were randomly selected from hospitality industries in Eskişehir and Antalya. For the hospitality sector in Eskişehir 292 employees and for the hospitality sector in Antalya 176 employees were participate to the study. Questionnaires were filed out by participant as voluntarily and they were informed about the study. The questionnaire was adapted on the basis of Violence in the Workplace (Aytaç et al., 2011). There were 27 questions: 12 on sociodemographic characteristics and workplace information, and 15 on workplace violence, types of violence, responses to violence, guidelines, training and support from management, job satisfaction, depression, anxiety and stress levels of participants. Analyzing the data SPSS version 20.0 package program was used. Descriptive Statistics were calculated. To see whether the differences among employees exposure to violence and sociodemographic characteristics Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests performed. To compare different depression, anxiety and stress levels of participants in terms of exposed and not exposed to violence T test was performed. Results Table 5: Degree of Worry About Being Subjected and Exposure to Violence Results Table 3: Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U Tests Summary for exposed to violence according to demographical and work characteristics Worry Never Rarely Sometimes Frequently Always Total Violence 𝒏 % Expossed 61 13,1 18 3,9 12 2,6 3 0,6 94 20,2 Not expossed 211 45,3 102 21,9 39 8,4 9 1,9 11 2,4 372 79,8 272 58,4 120 25,8 51 10,9 466 100 𝑲𝒓𝒖𝒔𝒌𝒂𝒍 𝑾𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒔 𝑻𝒆𝒔𝒕 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒔 𝑵 𝑿 Sıra sd 𝑿 𝟐 𝒑 𝑨𝒈𝒆 𝟏𝟖−𝟐𝟗 123 102,92 3 10,36 .016 𝟑𝟎−𝟑𝟗 53 115,83 𝟒𝟎−𝟒𝟗 20 126,63 ≥𝟓𝟎 15 69,03 𝑻𝒚𝒑𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒉𝒐𝒕𝒆𝒍 𝟑 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫 51 89,19 2 10,08 .006 𝟒 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒓 40 94,41 𝟓 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒓 120 117,01 𝑫𝒆𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝑭𝒓𝒐𝒏𝒕 𝒐𝒇𝒇𝒊𝒄𝒆 61 89,37 6 12,74 .047 𝑺𝒆𝒓𝒗𝒊𝒄𝒆 66 103,31 𝑯𝒐𝒖𝒔𝒆𝒌𝒆𝒆𝒑𝒊𝒏𝒈 28 127,75 𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕 𝑹𝒆𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 5 106,00 𝑲𝒊𝒕𝒄𝒉𝒆𝒏 113,37 𝑨𝒄𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 11 108,23 𝑶𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 25 110,72 𝑾𝒐𝒓𝒌 𝒅𝒖𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒉𝒐𝒕𝒆𝒍 (𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒓) <𝟏 57 114,01 4 13,674 .008 𝟏−𝟓 136 104,97 𝟔−𝟏𝟎 13 61,12 𝟏𝟏−𝟏𝟓 185,50 ≥𝟏𝟔 142,17 𝑴𝒂𝒏𝒏 𝑾𝒉𝒊𝒕𝒏𝒆𝒚 𝑼 𝑻𝒆𝒔𝒕 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒔 𝑵 𝑿 Sıra ∑Sıra 𝑼 𝒑 𝑮𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒓 𝑴𝒂𝒍𝒆 131 99,12 12985,00 4339,00 .028 𝑭𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒍𝒆 80 117,26 9381,00 𝑴𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒔 𝑴𝒂𝒓𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒅 130 101,19 13155,00 4640,00 .129 𝑺𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒍𝒆 81 113,72 9211,00 𝑪𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝑬𝒔𝒌𝒊ş𝒆𝒉𝒊𝒓 104 98,24 10216,50 4756,50 .057 𝑨𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒚𝒂 107 113,55 12149,50 𝑾𝒐𝒓𝒌 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒔 𝑷𝒆𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒆𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒐𝒚𝒆𝒆 159 111,76 17769,50 3218,50 .012 𝑺𝒆𝒂𝒔𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐨𝐲𝐞𝐞 52 88,39 4596,50 Reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NOISH). (1996). Violence in the workplace—Current Intelligence Bulletin 57. NOISH Publications and Products. Retrieved from niosh/docs/96-100/ Paul E. Spector , Martha L. Coulter , Heather G. Stockwell & Mary W. Matz (2007). Perceived violence climate: A new construct and its relationship to workplace physical violence and verbal aggression, and their potential consequences, Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations, 21:2, , DOI: / Ashford, S. J., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1989). Content, cause, and consequences of job insecurity: A theory-based measure and substantive test. Academy of Management journal, 32(4), International Labour Organisation 2001, ‘Safework’
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.