Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Trumping Oracle Exadata

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Trumping Oracle Exadata"— Presentation transcript:

1 Trumping Oracle Exadata
A short story

2 Introduction One of the world’s most prominent technology companies recently evaluated Oracle’s Exadata against two Fusion Powered servers. Sometimes two can be bigger than Exa. 

3 Initial Situation Prominent technology company needs fast and reliable infrastructure to service tens to hundreds of thousands of requests per minute Architecture based on a pod-like design with many pods aggregated for scale Transaction-driven application requires disproportionate amount of storage resources and disk-optimizing acrobatics

4 Stage 1 – Single Pod Design
Two Sun T5440 servers 2x NetApp 6080s 1X Performance Acceleration Modules 12 disk shelves Output 75,000 IOPS Result Insufficient performance

5 Stage 2 – Single Pod Design
Two Sun T5440 servers 2x NetApp 6280s 2X Performance Acceleration Modules 12 disk shelves 4 shelves with SSDs Output 208,000 IOPS Result Insufficient performance

6 Stage 3 – Single Pod Design
Exadata (½ rack) Bundled servers Bundled SSDs Output 9,000 transactions per second Result Insufficient performance VERY EXPENSIVE

7 Stage 4 – Final Single Pod Design
Two HP DL 580 G7 servers 10 ioDrives per server 1.28TB each, 12.8TB total Output Over 39,000 transactions per second from single server 2nd server for failover Result Best-in-class performance Best-in-class price

8 High Availability – no problem
Oracle Dataguard Already paid for with site license RAC not required Data Guard configuration consisting of a primary database and a physical standby database. From the primary database, redo is being transmitted and applied to the standby database. Log apply services apply the redo out of the standby redo log files to the standby database. Source: Oracle.com

9 Final Comparison Exadata (½ rack) Two Fusion-powered servers
NetApp Disk Farms Exadata (½ rack) Two Fusion-powered servers Improvement Transactions per second (IOPS based) 9,000 39,000+ 4.3X Rack space Four 42U (servers + NTAP) 21U 8U 2.6X Cost Pricey ~$800,000 ~$400,000 2X Dollars per transaction $89 $10 9X Transactions per rack unit 429 4875 11.3X Fusion-io estimates cost from Exadata to end Fusion-io solution is $2.8million savings per pod


Download ppt "Trumping Oracle Exadata"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google