1. Volume 84, Issue 11, Pages 1579-1584 (November 2013)
A stabilization device to improve the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during ambulance transportation: A randomized crossover trial 
Ning-Ping Foo, Jer-Hao Chang, Shih-Bin Su, Hung-Jung Lin, Kow-Tong Chen, Ching-Fa Cheng, Tsung-Yi Lin, Pei-Chung Chen, How- Ran Guo 
Resuscitation 
Volume 84, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
DOI: /j.resuscitation
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
Flowchart of the study. CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; NM, non-moving ambulance; MND, moving ambulance without device; MD, moving ambulance with device.
Resuscitation  , DOI: ( /j.resuscitation )
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2 The structures of the stabilization device.
Resuscitation  , DOI: ( /j.resuscitation )
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
The comparison of effective chest compression among different groups. ANOVA for repeat measurements; Post hoc: Bonferroni test. *Significant difference between NM and MND (p<0.05). #Significant difference between NM and MD (p<0.05). ¶Significant difference between MND and MD (p<0.05).
Resuscitation  , DOI: ( /j.resuscitation )
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

5. Fig. 4
The comparison of effective chest compression (a) and no-flow fraction (b) between straight and curved sections during transportation. Statistical method: Paired t test.
Resuscitation  , DOI: ( /j.resuscitation )
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

6. Fig. 5
The comparison of sway index among different groups. Statistical method: Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Resuscitation  , DOI: ( /j.resuscitation )
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions