Gyanesh Lama, Ph.D. Assessment Academy

Common Assignments: An Innovative Approach to Standardizing Assessment Measures
Gyanesh Lama, Ph.D. Assessment Academy Council on Social Work Education 62nd Annual Program Meeting Atlanta, Georgia November 6, 2016 Department of Social Work Education

Assessment EPAS Competencies -> Practice Behaviors Problem:
Developing a valid and reliable assessment measure of EPAS competencies and practice behaviors. Standardizing the measures across multiple competencies, across multiple programs, multiple courses and sessions, and over time.

PERCENT OF STUDENTS ACHIEVING BENCHMARK
Assessment Outcome ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES MASTERS OF SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM 8/31/2016 Form AS 4(M)-Duplicate and expand as needed. Provide table(s) to support self -study narrative addressing Accreditation Standards below. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ This form is used to assist the COA in the evaluation of the program’s compliance with Accreditation Standards stated below. 4.0.2: The program provides summary data and outcomes for the assessment of each of its competencies, identifying the percentage of students achieving each benchmark. 4.0.4: The program uses Form AS 4 (B) and/or Form AS4 (M) to report its most recent assessment outcomes to constituents and the public on its website and routinely up-dates (minimally every 2 years) these postings. All Council on Social Work Education programs measure and report student learning outcomes. Students are assessed on their mastery of the competencies which comprise the accreditation standards of the Council on Social Work Education. These competencies are dimensions of social work practice which all social workers are expected to master during their professional training. A measurement benchmark is set by the social work programs for each competency. An assessment score at or above that benchmark is considered by the program to represent mastery of that particular competency. COMPETENCY COMPETENCY BENCHMARK PERCENT OF STUDENTS ACHIEVING BENCHMARK MSW FOUNDATION ADVANCED Identify as a Professional Social Worker 90% students will demonstrate this competency 99% Apply Ethical Principles 96% 98% Apply Critical Thinking 97% Engage Diversity in Practice Advance Human Rights/ Social and Economic Justice 100% Engage Research Informed Practice/ Practice Informed Research Human Behavior Knowledge 95% Engage Policy Practice to Advance Well- Being and Deliver Services Respond to Practice Contexts Practice Engagement Practice Assessment Practice Intervention Practice Evaluation

Competencies and Practice Behaviors
Educational Policy 2.1.6 CSWE-PB (2008 EPAS) Fresno State-PB (AY 13-14) Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research. Use practice experience to inform scientific inquiry and Use research evidence to inform practice. MSW FOUNDATION Use practice experience to inform scientific inquiry. Use research evidence to inform practice. MSW ADVANCED Use advanced practice experiences to inform research at multi systems level. Apply research methods to evaluate multi systems social work practice processes and outcomes.

PRACTICE BEHAVIOR (PB) MEASURES ASSESSEMNT PROCEDURES (PB)
APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT PLAN: MSW FOUNDATION Accreditation Standard The program presents its plan to assess the attainment of each of its competencies. The plan specifies procedures, multiple measures of each practice behavior, and benchmarks employed to assess the attainment of each of the program’s competencies. (AS B2.0.3, AS M2.0.4). Following table with explanatory narrative present the MSW PROGRAM’S ASSESSMENT plan COMPETENCY COMPETENCY BENCHMARK PRACTICE BEHAVIOR (PB) MEASURES ASSESSEMNT PROCEDURES (PB) OUTCOME MEASURES BENCHMARK 2.1.6: Engage Research Informed Practice/ Practice Informed Research 90% students will demonstrate this competency PB 1. Use practice experience to inform scientific inquiry Measure 1: Common Assignment -- Construct a solid narrative framework for a project or thesis (SWRK 261) Measure 2: Field Learning Agreement-- Practice Evaluation (EP2) (SWRK 281) For Measure 1: Students must score a minimum of 3.0 on a scale of For Measure 2: Students must score a minimum of 3.0 on a scale of 1 – 5. Determine the percentage of students that attained the benchmark for each outcome measure. Average the percentages together to obtain the percentage of students demonstrating competence. Determine whether this percentage is larger than the Competency Benchmark. PB 2. Use research evidence to inform practice. Common Assignment -- Literature Review (SWRK 260) Field Learning Agreement-- Literature Review (EP1) (SWRK 281)

Common Assignment Definition:
Specific assignment developed by faculty who have experience teaching identified content and current knowledge needed to deliver the material associated with the practice behaviors. Common assignments are intended to assess a student’s knowledge regarding a practice behavior and function as standardized measurement tools, which assess, at the minimum, one practice behavior that is common across the course sections. Common assignments allow for the comparison of a measure of practice behaviors across course sections that are taught by one or more faculty in a given semester. The objective of the common assignments is to minimize subjectivity in faculty-level and section-level assessment. It is designed to ensure that the observed variations in outcome are due to student performance and not due to the differences in the measurement tool and faculty level subjectivity. Common assignments are designed to measure student mastery of explicit instruction. This mastery is measured using a standardized grading rubric that extracts quantifiable outcome data. Common assignments were designed to measure practice behaviors.

Common Assignment: Example
MSW Program SWRK 200: Case Study / Role Play SWRK 200: Final Paper: Globalization and Social Work SWRK 203: Policy Analysis Paper SWRK 203: Policy Brief SWRK 212: Group Paper & Presentation SWRK 212: Multisystem Assessments SWRK 213: Self -Interview Paper SWRK 220: Theoretical Applications to a Culturally Sensitive Practice Situation SWRK 221: Final: Oral & Written Case Presentation SWRK 224: Final Paper: Advanced Culturally Relevant Practice to a Case Study SWRK 225: Final Paper: Advanced Group Lab Analysis SWRK 227: Final Paper: Advanced Multisystem Assessment of a Couple using a Vignette Case Study SWRK 246: Organizational Plan SWRK 246: Organizational Assessment SWRK 247: Community Assessment SWRK 247: Intervention & Evaluation Plan SWRK 260: Literature Review SWRK 261: Project Proposal SW 298/299: Project/Thesis

Common Assignment: Example
BA Program SWRK 123: Final Group Activity/Presentation SWRK 123: Reflection Paper: Critical Thinking and Integration of Social Welfare Policy SWRK 135: Life Summary: Understanding Development over the Life Span SWRK 136: Cultural Autobiography SWRK 160: Final Interviewing Skills Exercise SWRK 160: The Self Understanding Paper SWRK 161: Group Project on Assessment Paper and Presentation SWRK 170: Human Subjects and Ethical Issues: How Research Informs Social Work Practice & How Social Work Practice Informs Research SWRK 171: Article Analysis: Research Informed Practice / Practice Informed Research (Using Practice Experience to Inform Scientific Inquiry) SWRK 180: Agency Analysis SWRK 183: Film Critique: Interview Strengths & Challenges SWRK 183: Intervention & Evaluation Plan SWRK 183: Interview Recording SWRK 180: Written Grant Proposal

Measure 1: COMMON ASSIGNMENT
PROGRAM ID-PBCODE3 Measure 1: COMMON ASSIGNMENT Measure 2; F-ID MSWADV MSWADV2.1.1 PB 1 SWRK 227: Final Paper: Advanced Multisystem Assessment of a Couple using a Vignette Case Study 283_PD-1 MSWADV2.1.1 PB 2 SWRK 225: Final Paper: Advanced Group Lab Analysis 282_PD2 MSWADV2.1.2 PB 1 SWRK 224: Final Paper: Advanced Culturally Relevant Practice to a Case Study 282_PD6 MSWADV2.1.2 PB 2 283_PD-2 MSWADV2.1.3 PB 1 282_MS1 MSWADV2.1.3 PB 2 SWRK 247: Intervention & Evaluation Plan 283_MS-10 MSWADV2.1.4 PB 1 MSWADV2.1.4 PB 2 282_MS5 MSWADV2.1.5 PB 1 SWRK 246: Organizational Assessment 282_MS3 MSWADV2.1.5 PB 2 283_MS-9 MSWADV2.1.6 PB 1 SW 298/299: Project/Thesis 282_EP1 MSWADV2.1.6 PB 2 SWRK 246: Organizational Plan MSWADV2.1.7 PB 1 282_PD3 MSWADV2.1.8 PB 1 SWRK 247: Community Assessment 283_MS-2 MSWADV2.1.8 PB 2 283_MS-7 MSWADV2.1.9 PB 1 MSWADV2.1.9 PB 2 282_MS10 MSWADV (a)PB 1 283_MS-8 MSWADV (a)PB 2 282_MS4 MSWADV (b)PB 1 MSWADV (b)PB 2 283_EP-1 MSWADV (c)PB 1 282_MS9 MSWADV (c)PB 2 MSWADV (d)PB 1 MSWADV (d)PB 2 283_EP-2

PROGRAM ID-PBCODE3 COMMON ASSIGNMENT F-ID MSW MSW2.1.1 PB 1 SWRK 220: Theoretical Applications to a Culturally Sensitive Practice Situation 280_PD2 MSW2.1.1 PB 2 280_PD1 280 - PD 1 (Consultation) 281_PD1 MSW2.1.1 PB 3 280_PD3 280 - PD3 (Participate in Professional Organizations) 281_PD3 MSW2.1.1 PB4 281- PD2 (FLE-Professional Use of Self) 281_PD2 MSW2.1.2 PB 1 280_PD5 MSW2.1.2 PB 2 280_PD4 MSW2.1.3 PB 1 SWRK 212: Multisystem Assessments 280_MS1 MSW2.1.3 PB 2 SWRK 212: Group Paper & Presentation 281_MS-1 MSW2.1.3 PB3 SWRK 260: Literature Review 280_EP1 MSW2.1.4 PB 1 280_MS7 MSW2.1.4 PB 2 SWRK 213: Self -Interview Paper MSW2.1.4 PB 3 280 - PD 4 (Professional Staff Interview) 281_MS-2 MSW2.1.5 PB 1 SWRK 200: Case Study / Role Play 280_EP3 MSW2.1.5 PB 2 SWRK 200: Final Paper: Globalization and Social Work 281_MS-3 MSW2.1.6 PB 1 SWRK 261: Project Proposal 281_EP-2 MSW2.1.6 PB 2 281_EP-1 MSW2.1.7 PB 1 MSW2.1.7 PB 2 281_MS-7 MSW2.1.8 PB 1 MSW2.1.8 PB 2 SWRK 203: Policy Analysis Paper 281_EP-4 MSW2.1.8 PB3 281_MS-4 MSW2.1.9 PB 1 MSW2.1.9 PB 2 SWRK 203: Policy Brief MSW (a) PB 1 280_MS-7 MSW (a) PB 2 SWRK 221: Final: Oral & Written Case Presentation MSW (b) PB 1 MSW (b) PB 2 MSW (c) PB 1 281_MS-6 MSW (c) PB 2 MSW (d) PB 1 281_EP-3

PROGRAM ID-PBCODE3 COMMON ASSIGNMENT F-ID BA BA2.1.1 PB 1 SWRK 183: Film Critique: Interview Strengths & Challenges 182_PI-6 BA2.1.1 PB 2 SWRK 160: The Self Understanding Paper 181_PI-4 BA2.1.1 PB3 182_PI3 181 - PI 2 (Field Student Performance Evaluation – Boundary Setting) 181_PI2 BA2.1.2 PB 1 182_VE-1 BA2.1.2 PB 2 181_VE2 BA2.1.3 PB 1 SWRK 135: Life Summary: Understanding Development over the Life Span 182_GP-6 BA2.1.3 PB 2 SWRK 161: Group Project on Assessment Paper and Presentation 182_GP-10 BA2.1.3 PB3 SWRK 180: Written Grant Proposal 181_GP8 BA2.1.4 PB 1 182_GP-1 BA2.1.4 PB 2 SWRK 136: Cultural Autobiography 182_PV-4 BA2.1.4 PB3 SWRK 183: Interview Recording 182_GP-4 BA2.1.5 PB 1 SWRK 123: Final Group Activity/Presentation 182_PI-1 BA2.1.5 PB 2 182_GP-7 BA2.1.6 PB 1 SWRK 171: Article Analysis: Research Informed Practice / Practice Informed Research (Using Practice Experience to Inform Scientific Inquiry) 182_EP-2 BA2.1.6 PB 2 SWRK 170: Human Subjects and Ethical Issues: How Research Informs Social Work Practice & How Social Work Practice Informs Research 181_EP1 BA2.1.7 PB 1 182_GP-3 BA2.1.7 PB 2 181_GP3 BA2.1.8 PB 1 181_VE1 BA2.1.8 PB 2 181_GP6 BA2.1.8 PB3 181_PV3 BA2.1.9 PB 1 SWRK 123: Reflection Paper: Critical Thinking and Integration of Social Welfare Policy 181_GP5 BA2.1.9 PB 2 BA (a)PB 1 SWRK 160: Final Interviewing Skills Exercise 181_GP1 BA (a)PB 2 BA (b)PB 1 SWRK 180: Agency Analysis 181_GP4 BA (b)PB 2 BA (c)PB 1 182_GP-2 BA (c)PB 2 181_GP2 BA (d)PB 1 SWRK 183: Intervention & Evaluation Plan 182_EP-1

PROGRAM ID-PBCODE3 PRACTICE-BHAVIORS MSW MSW2.1.1 PB 1 PB 1. Demonstrate professional behavior, appearance, and communication MSW2.1.1 PB 2 PB 2. Use social work supervision consultation and training for professional growth. MSW2.1.1 PB 3 PB 3. Participate in professional social work organization/activity. MSW2.1.1 PB4 PB4. Attend to professional roles and boundaries MSW2.1.2 PB 1 PB 1. Apply strategies of ethical reasoning and existing social workethical code to arrive at principled decisions. MSW2.1.2 PB 2 PB 2. Recognize and manage personal values in a way that allows professional values to guide practice. MSW2.1.3 PB 1 PB 1. Analyze models of assessment, prevention , and evaluation to practice at all levels of practice. MSW2.1.3 PB 2 PB 2. Demonstrate effective oral and written communication in wotking with ind, fam.., groups organizations, communities and colleagues. MSW2.1.3 PB3 PB3. Distinguish, appraise, and integrate multiple sources of knowledge, including research-based knowledge, and practice wisdom. MSW2.1.4 PB 1 PB 1. Recognize and understand how diverse factors intersect and assist in understanding experiences of opression, marginalization, alienation, or creation or enhancement of privlege and power MSW2.1.4 PB 2 PB 2. Gain sufficient self-awareness to manage the influences of personal biases and values in working with diverse groups MSW2.1.4 PB 3 PB 3. View themselves as learners and engage those with whom they work as informants MSW2.1.5 PB 1 PB 1. Understand the forms and mechanisms of opression and discrimination at all system levels MSW2.1.5 PB 2 PB 2. Advocate for practices that promote human rights and the goals of social and economic justice MSW2.1.6 PB 1 PB 1. Use practice experience to inform scientific inquiry MSW2.1.6 PB 2 PB 2. Use research evidence to inform practice. MSW2.1.7 PB 1 PB 1. Utilize conceptual frameworks to guide the processes of assessment, intervention and evaluation. MSW2.1.7 PB 2 PB 2. Critique and apply knowledge from liberal arts to undeerstand peerson environment and their interaction. MSW2.1.8 PB 1 PB 1. Identify and articulate societal values reflected in social welfare policies and programs. MSW2.1.8 PB 2 PB 2. Analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance social well-being MSW2.1.8 PB3 PB3. Collaborate with colleagues and clients for effective policy action MSW2.1.9 PB 1 PB 1. maintain currency with changing locales, populations, scientific and technological developments, and emerging societal trends to assess the relevancy of service. MSW2.1.9 PB 2 PB 2. Advocate for change in service delivery and practice to improve the quality of services. MSW (a) PB 1 PB 1. Use empathy, reflective listening, and other interpersonal skills to effectively engage individuals, families, groups, organizations,and commuities. MSW (a) PB 2 PB 2. Develop a mutually agreed upon focus of work and identify desired outcomes. MSW (b) PB 1 PB 1. Collect, organize, analyze, organize, and interpret assessment information form identified system levels MSW (b) PB 2 PB 2. Develop a mutually agreed upon interventiongoals, objectives, and strtegies at identified systems levels MSW (c) PB 1 PB 1. Implement practive interventions, including those that are evidence based, to address mutually agreed upon goals/ objectives at identified system MSW (c) PB 2 PB 2. Facilitate trasition, interruptions, and ending at identified system levels. MSW (d) PB 1 PB 1. Monitor, analyze and evaluate professional behavior and interventions at indentified system levels.

PROGRAM ID-PBCODE3 PRACTICE-BHAVIORS MSWADV MSWADV2.1.1 PB 1 PB 1. Demonstrate professional use of self in specific multi systems level interventions. MSWADV2.1.1 PB 2 PB 2. Demonstrate commitment to ongoing professional development by understanding one's professional strengths, limitations, challenges and needs, including self-awareness. MSWADV (a)PB 1 PB 1. Demonstrate effective engagement with consumers/stakeholders at multi system levels utilizing advanced strengths based approaches. MSWADV (a)PB 2 PB 2. Facilitate mutual learning at multi systems levels in planning interventions. MSWADV (b)PB 1 PB 1. Demonstrate the ability to systematically assemble and interpret assessment tools. MSWADV (b)PB 2 PB 2. Demonstrate continuous assessment and collaboration at relevant systems levels for the development of specific practice outcomes. MSWADV (c)PB 1 PB 1. Identify and critically evaluate, select, and apply best practices and evidence-based interventions at multi systems levels. MSWADV (c)PB 2 PB 2. Demonstrate collaboration with consumers/stakeholders and/or professionals to address complexities and facilitate sustainable interventions. MSWADV (d)PB 1 PB 1. Identify, critically evaluate, select and apply methods for evaluation of practice. MSWADV (d)PB 2 PB 2. Use practice outcomes to modify interventions and increase effectiveness at multi systems levels. MSWADV2.1.2 PB 1 PB 1. Employ strategies of ethical decision-making to multi systems practice and research. MSWADV2.1.2 PB 2 PB 2. Manage personal biases as they intersect with professional knowledge, values and laws in social work practice MSWADV2.1.3 PB 1 PB 1. Complete comprehensive assessments using a multi systems perspective. MSWADV2.1.3 PB 2 PB 2. Provide effective verbal and written communication in trans disciplinary settings. MSWADV2.1.4 PB 1 PB 1. Demonstrate depth in critical analysis of the intersectionality of diversity factors. MSWADV2.1.4 PB 2 PB 2. Effectively implement multi systems level interventions that are culturally congruent with the needs of diverse populations. MSWADV2.1.5 PB 1 PB 1. Apply knowledge of intersectionality and oppression to guide intervention at multi systems levels. MSWADV2.1.5 PB 2 PB 2. Implement advanced practices at multi systems levels that promote human rights and social and economic justice MSWADV2.1.6 PB 1 PB 1. Use advanced practice experiences to inform research at multi systems level. MSWADV2.1.6 PB 2 PB 2. Apply research methods to evaluate multi systems social work practice processes and outcomes. MSWADV2.1.7 PB 1 PB 1. Synthesize and differentially apply theories of human behavior and the social environment to guide practice at multi systems levels. MSWADV2.1.8 PB 1 PB 1. Apply current models of advanced policy practice to micro and macro assessments, prevention and intervention. MSWADV2.1.8 PB 2 PB 2. Engage in advocacy that advances social and economic well-being on a regional, state, national and/or international level. MSWADV2.1.9 PB 1 PB 1. Recognize and assess the context for practice and intervene based on identified socioeconomic, cultural, and technological changes that impact multi systems practice. MSWADV2.1.9 PB 2 PB 2. Demonstrate initiative in responding to socioeconomic and political contexts that affect practice.

PROGRAM ID-PBCODE3 PRACTICE-BHAVIORS BA BA2.1.1 PB 1 PB 1. Demonstrate professional behavior, appearance and communication BA2.1.1 PB 2 PB 2. Use social work supervision and practice personal reflection to assure continual professional development BA2.1.1 PB3 PB3. Attend to professional roles and boundaries. BA2.1.2 PB 1 PB 1. Apply beginning strategies of ethical reasoning and existing social work ethical code to arrive at principled decisions. BA2.1.2 PB 2 PB 2. Recognize and manage personal values in a way that allows professional values to guide practice. BA2.1.3 PB 1 PB 1. Identify models of assessment, prevention , intervention and evaluation to practice at all levels of practice. BA2.1.3 PB 2 PB 2. Demonstrate effective oral and written communication in working with individuals, families, groups, organizations, communities and colleagues. BA2.1.3 PB3 PB3. Distinguish, appraise, and integrate multiple sources of knowledge, including research-based knowledge, and practice wisdom. BA2.1.4 PB 1 PB 1. Recognize and understand how diverse factors intersect and assist in understanding experiences of oppression, marginalization, alienation, or creation or enhancement of privilege and power BA2.1.4 PB 2 PB 2. Gain sufficient self-awareness to manage the influences of personal biases and values in working with diverse groups BA2.1.4 PB3 PB3. View themselves as learners and engage those with whom they work as informants. BA2.1.5 PB 1 PB 1. Understand the forms and mechanisms of oppression and discrimination at all system levels BA2.1.5 PB 2 PB 2. Advocate for practices of human rights and the goals of social and economic justice BA2.1.6 PB 1 PB 1. Begin to use practice experience to inform scientific inquiry BA2.1.6 PB 2 PB 2. Begin to use research evidence to inform practice. BA2.1.7 PB 1 PB 1. Utilize conceptual frameworks to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation BA2.1.7 PB 2 PB 2. Critique and apply knowledge from liberal arts to understand person environment and their interaction. BA2.1.8 PB 1 PB 1. Identify and articulate societal values reflected in social welfare policies and programs. BA2.1.8 PB 2 PB 2. Analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance social well-being BA2.1.8 PB3 PB3. Collaborate with colleagues and clients for effective policy action. BA2.1.9 PB 1 PB 1. Understand changing locales, populations, scientific and technological developments, and emerging societal trends to assess the relevance of service. BA2.1.9 PB 2 PB 2. Advocate for change in service delivery and practice to improve the quality of social services. BA (a)PB 1 PB 1. Use empathy, reflective listening, and other interpersonal skills to effectively engage individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. BA (a)PB 2 PB 2. Develop a mutually agreed upon focus of work and identify desired outcomes BA (b)PB 1 PB 1. Collect, organize, analyze, and interpret assessment information from identified systems levels BA (b)PB 2 PB 2. Develop mutually agreed upon intervention goals, objectives, and strategies at identified systems levels BA (c)PB 1 PB 1. Implement direct and indirect practice interventions, including those that are evidence based, to address mutually agreed upon goals/objectives at identified system BA (c)PB 2 PB 2. Facilitate transition, interruptions, and endings at identified systems levels. BA (d)PB 1 PB 1. Monitor, analyze and evaluate professional behavior and interventions at identified systems levels.

PROGRAM F-ID FIELD BA 181_EP1 181 EP 1 (Administrative data analysis) 181_GP1 181- GP 1 (Ability to engage) 181_GP2 181- GP 2 (Problem Solving Model) 181_GP3 181-GP 3 -(Apply social systems model) 181_GP4 181- GP 4 (Assessment of Agency) 181_GP5 181 GP 5 (International agency) 181_GP6 181 - GP 6 (Community meeting) 181_GP8 181 - GP8 (Field Evaluation-Grant Proposal) 181_PI2 181 - PI 2 (Field Student Performance Evaluation – Boundary Setting) 181_PI-4 181-PI 4 (Prepare for supervision) 181_PV3 181_PV3 (Field Evaluation – Agency Guidelines) 181_VE1 181- VE 1 (Code of Ethics) 181_VE2 181-VE 2 (Values exercise) 182_EP-1 182 EP 1 (Outcome evaluation of consumer services) 182_EP-2 182 EP 2 (Literature review) 182_GP-1 182- GP 1- Engage effectively with diverse clients 182_GP-10 182- GP 10 (Documentation) 182_GP-2 182- GP 2 (Problem Solving Model) 182_GP-3 182- GP 3 (Assessment of Client/consumer) 182- GP3 (Client/Consumer Assessment) 182_GP-4 182- GP 4 (Culturally relevant plan) 182- GP 4 (Field Evaluation – Mutual Planning) 182_GP-6 182- GP 6 (Eco map) 182_GP-7 182 - GP 7 (Multidisciplinary meeting) 182_PI-1 182- PI 1 (Impact of agency policies) 182, PI 1 (Impact of agency policies) 182_PI3 182- PI3 (Field Evaluation – Professional Roles) 182_PI-6 182-PI 6 (Professionalism in conduct) 182_PV-4 182- PV 4 (Apply mutuality, respect) 182_VE-1 182-VE 1 (Apply NASW Code)

PROGRAM F-ID FIELD MSW 280_EP1 280 - EP 1 (Evaluation of Practice) 280_EP3 280 - EP 3 (Advocating for Services) 280 - EP 3 (Evaluate Practice) 280_MS1 280 - MS 1 (Biospychosocial Assessment) 280_MS7 MS 7 (Ethnograpahic Interview) 280_MS-7 280 - MS 7 (Ethnographic Interviewing) 280_PD1 280 - PD 1 (Consultation) 280_PD2 280 - PD 2 (Profession Conduct) 280_PD3 280 - PD3 (Participate in Professional Organizations) 280_PD4 280 - PD 4 (Interview Professional Staff) 280 - PD 4 (Professional Staff Interview) 280_PD5 280 - PD 5 (Conduct Ethics Audit) 280 - PD 5 (Self Awareness) 281_EP-1 281 - EP 1 (Literature Review) 281_EP-2 281 - EP 2 (Practice Evaluation 281_EP-3 281 - EP 3 (Evaluation of Change) 281_EP-4 281 - EP 4 (Program / Policy Assessment) 281_MS-1 281 - MS 1 (Biosychosocial Assessment) 281 - MS 1 (Multidimensional Assessment) 281 - MS 10 (Verbal and/or Written Assignment) 281_MS-2 281 - MS 2 (Culturally Relevant Service Plan) 281 - MS 2 (Culturally Relevant Service Plans) 281_MS-3 281 - MS 3 (Assessment of Organizational Structure) 281 - MS 3 (Interventtion Plan) 281_MS-4 281 - MS 4 (FLE-Plan regarding Access to Services) 281_MS-6 281 - MS 6 (Social Work Services 281 - MS 6 (Social Work Services) 281_MS-7 281 - MS 7 (Foundation Social Work Services) 281_PD1 281 - PD 1 (Supervision Participation) 281_PD2 281-PD2 (FLE-Professional Use of Self) 281_PD3 281 - PD 3 (Participate in Professional Organizations)

PROGRAM F-ID FIELD MSWADV 282_EP1 282 - EP1 - Select & apply an appropriate research methodology experience to inform research at multi systems levels. 282- EP 1- Evaluation of Group Practice 282- EP 1-Evaluation of Independent Practice 282_MS1 282- MS 1 MD Assessment 282- MS 1-MD Assessment 282_MS10 282- MS 10-Administration Management 282_MS3 282- MS 3-Assessment 282- MS 3-Organizational Assessment 282_MS4 282- MS 4-Mututal Service Planning 282_MS5 282- MS 5-Practice and Individuals 282_MS9 282- MS 9 Advanced Practice Approaches 282- MS 9-Advanced Practice Approaches 282_PD2 282- PD 2 Professional Self Awareness 282_PD3 282- PD 3-Theoretical Framework 282_PD6 282- PD 6 Ethical Dilemma 283_EP-1 283- EP 1-Evaluation of Family Practice 283_EP-2 283- EP 2-Evaluation of Community Practice 283_MS-10 283- MS 10-Case Summary/ Policy Analysis 283_MS-2 283- MS 2 -Needs Assessment 283_MS-7 283- MS 7-Multiple Practice rules 283_MS-8 283- MS 8-Process Recording 283_MS-9 283- MS 9-Advanced practice methods 283_PD-1 283- PD 1 - Professional Use of Self 283- PD 1-Professional Use of Self 283_PD-2 283- PD 2 Ethics Consult

DATA MANAGEMENT and ANALYSIS
Common Assignment Data: Qualtrics Field Data: IPT Merging and Analyzing Data: Calculate Percent Distribution: Use SPSS for Field Data (tips: use syntax) Develop a Unique Code that will link EPAS to Common Assignment and Field Data Build a Access Database Merge Common Assignment and Field Data using Query Design Build series of query designs to produce desired reports

CA-ID CA A B C D F TOTAL A+B percent A+B 11 11: SWRK 183: Film Critique: Interview Strengths & Challenges 9 5 14 100% 19 7 12 3 22 86% 10 4 1 27 81% 12: SWRK 183: Intervention & Evaluation Plan

Colleagues, This is a gentle reminder that please enter your common assignment grades as early as you finished grading. Please go to the following link and follow the instruction to enter grades for your common assignments. Please enter the grades for all the common assignments. If you have more than one common assignment, you will need to enter grades for each of them separately. Please repeat the steps. The system will not allow you to move forward if the entry is not complete. Test runs show that it only takes, on average, 27 seconds to enter the requested data per common assignment on the above link. I hope you will not mind taking two minutes of your time to enter your data. This is a requirement for CSWE Assessment Reporting. All common assignment data must be collected. The grades must be entered before May 30th. Thank you for your cooperation. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to let me know.

Fairly easy to implement
STRENGTH Fairly easy to implement Instruments are standardized, considered valid and reliable Common Assignments could be simulations Quick turn-around Data can be used for other assessments: GE, SOAP, Annual Report Potential for automation

Fairly lengthy process to decide on the Common Assignments and Rubrics
WEAKNESS Fairly lengthy process to decide on the Common Assignments and Rubrics Academic freedom: not all faculty are fan of standardized system Good amount of database design and analyses skills needed Some manual adjustments are needed, not complete automation

Gyanesh Lama, Ph.D. Assessment Academy

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Gyanesh Lama, Ph.D. Assessment Academy"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Gyanesh Lama, Ph.D. Assessment Academy

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Gyanesh Lama, Ph.D. Assessment Academy"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback