Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 10. The logarithm of the ratio of Σ<sub>2</sub> density parameter between the QSO-like (open red) and Seyfert-like (filled blue) and non-AGN (black)

Published bySpencer Page Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 10. The logarithm of the ratio of Σ<sub>2</sub> density parameter between the QSO-like (open red) and Seyfert-like (filled blue) and non-AGN (black)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 10. The logarithm of the ratio of Σ<sub>2</sub> density parameter between the QSO-like (open red) and Seyfert-like (filled blue) and non-AGN (black) sources and their control samples as a function of their 2–10 keV X-ray luminosity. The zero line denotes the boundary between a source being in an over or underdense environment compared to its control sources (Σ<sup>X-ray</sup>/Σ<sup>control</sup> = 1). From: Mergers as triggers for nuclear activity: a near-IR study of the close environment of AGN in the VISTA-VIDEO survey Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2014;439(1): doi: /mnras/stu009 Mon Not R Astron Soc | © 2014 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society 1

Download ppt "Figure 10. The logarithm of the ratio of Σ<sub>2</sub> density parameter between the QSO-like (open red) and Seyfert-like (filled blue) and non-AGN (black)"

Similar presentations

Spectral Energy Distributions of obscured AGN E. Lusso, A. Comastri, E. Treister, D. Sanders, H. Hao, M. Elvis, C. Vignali, R. Gilli, G.Zamorani, M. Brusa,

Spectral Energy Distributions of obscured AGN E. Lusso, A. Comastri, E. Treister, D. Sanders, H. Hao, M. Elvis, C. Vignali, R. Gilli, G.Zamorani, M. Brusa,
© Oxford University Press 2008 9.3 How are the plates moving?

© Oxford University Press How are the plates moving?
Figure 4. Same as Fig. 3 but for x = 5.5.

Figure 4. Same as Fig. 3 but for x = 5.5.
Figure 1. Orbital evolution of the planetesimals and Jupiter-mass planet in simulation S1. The solid points show the planetesimals. The radii of the planetesimals.

Figure 1. Orbital evolution of the planetesimals and Jupiter-mass planet in simulation S1. The solid points show the planetesimals. The radii of the planetesimals.
Figure 1. Trial one and trial two subject assignments

Figure 1. Trial one and trial two subject assignments
Figure 1. HATLAS J (z = 2. 372, marked with vertical line)

Figure 1. HATLAS J (z = , marked with vertical line)
From: Ion chemistry in the coma of comet 67P near perihelion

From: Ion chemistry in the coma of comet 67P near perihelion
Figure 3. The hybrid simulations results

Figure 3. The hybrid simulations results
Figure 2. A comparison between the modern PMS spectral type-to-effective temperature conversion scales of Pecaut & Mamajek (2013, solid red line, labelled.

Figure 2. A comparison between the modern PMS spectral type-to-effective temperature conversion scales of Pecaut & Mamajek (2013, solid red line, labelled.
Figure 1. Left – a small region of a typical polarized spectrum acquired with the ESPaDOnS instrument during the MiMeS project. This figure illustrates.

Figure 1. Left – a small region of a typical polarized spectrum acquired with the ESPaDOnS instrument during the MiMeS project. This figure illustrates.
Figure 1 Cumulative chance of pregnancy according to age at initiation of pregnancy seeking. The curves were drawn based on the following assumptions:

Figure 1 Cumulative chance of pregnancy according to age at initiation of pregnancy seeking. The curves were drawn based on the following assumptions:
From: Discovery of carbon-rich Miras in the Galactic bulge

From: Discovery of carbon-rich Miras in the Galactic bulge
Figure 1 Timeline of the project.

Figure 1 Timeline of the project.
From: The VISTA Deep Extragalactic Observations (VIDEO) survey★

From: The VISTA Deep Extragalactic Observations (VIDEO) survey★
From: Numerical aspects of giant impact simulations

From: Numerical aspects of giant impact simulations
Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.

Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.
Figure 3. Examples of tweets classified as ridicule.

Figure 3. Examples of tweets classified as ridicule.
From: The evolution of star formation activity in galaxy groups

From: The evolution of star formation activity in galaxy groups
Figure 1. Logos appearing in the choice experiment

Figure 1. Logos appearing in the choice experiment
Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google