1. Saint Joseph’s college of maine
Modernthink higher education insight survey 2016
Topline survey results

2. 281 Colleges Participated in 2016 (8th year)
National Distribution
SJC distribution
116,000+ Faculty & Staff 46,000+ Completed Responses 39.65% Participation 16,998 Faculty 12,836 Exempt Professionals 8,268 Administrators 6,925 Non-Exempt Staff 1,195 Adjunct
296 Faculty & Staff 190 Completed Responses 64%*Participation 41 Faculty (61%) 66 Exempt Professionals (70%) 29 Administrators (83%) 54 Non-Exempt Staff (54%) 0 Adjunct (*100% of SJC Full-time)

3. Random Sample Used for SJC Results
66.5% Response Rate
236 Surveys Sent
157 Total Respondents

4. Survey FORMAT 60-Statement online survey using 5 point agreement scale
Strongly Agree, Agree, Sometimes Agree/Sometimes Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree
18 benefits satisfaction items, 15 optional demographics, and 2 open-ended questions
Measures 15 dimensions reflecting managerial and organizational competencies

5. Survey Scoring Information
Poor
Warrants Attention
Fair to Mediocre
Good
Very Good to Excellent
0% - 44%
45% - 54%
55% - 64%
65% - 74%
75% - 100%

6. SJC 2016 Results Recognition in the Great Colleges To Work For Program
“Very Good to Excellent Category”
Institutions Scoring between 75% - 100%
(% of Participants who Strongly Agree/Agree)
______________________________________
SJC Result: Not Achieved in 2016

7. SJC 2016 Results Good Category (65% - 74%)
73% Supervisors/Department Chairs (2 points)
71% Pride (4 Points)
66% Job Satisfaction/Support (9 Points)
65% Compensation, Benefits & Work/Life Balance (10 Points)

8. Overall SJC Results 2016 vs 2013 0% - 44% 45% - 54% 55% - 64%
Poor
Warrants Attention
Fair to Mediocre
Good
Very Good to Excellent
0% - 44%
45% - 54%
55% - 64%
65% - 74%
75% - 100%
2016
2013
Job Satisfaction/Support
66%
Teaching Environment
48%
49%
Professional Development
61%
Compensation, Benefits & Work/Life Balance
65%
64%
Facilities
70%
Policies, Resources & Efficiency
47%
Shared Governance
50%
56%
Pride
71%
Supervisors/Department Chairs
73%
62%
Senior Leadership
46%
51%
Faculty, Administration & Staff Relations
43%
Communication
52%
Collaboration
55%
Fairness
Respect & Appreciation
57%
SURVEY AVERAGE

9. Results - Categories SJC Improvement in 5 Categories 2016 vs 2013
Compensation, Benefits & Work/Life Balance
Fair to Mediocre  Good
Supervisors/Department Chairs
Collaboration
Warrants Attention  Fair to Mediocre
Fairness
Faculty, Administration & Staff Relations
Poor  Warrants Attention

10. Results - categories SJC No Change in 9 Categories 2016 vs 2013
Job Satisfaction/Support
Good
Pride
Professional Development
Fair to Mediocre
Respect & Appreciation
Teaching Environment
Warrants Attention
Policies, Resources & Efficiency
Senior Leadership
Communication
SURVEY AVERAGE

11. SJC Dropped in 2 Categories Fair to Mediocre  Warrants Attention
Results - categories
SJC Dropped in 2 Categories
2016 vs 2013
Facilities
Good  Fair to Mediocre
Shared Governance
Fair to Mediocre  Warrants Attention

12. % Results 2016 vs 2013 Poor: 0% - 44% Warrants Attention: 45% - 54%
Job Satisfaction /Support
No change
Teaching Environment -1
Professional Development
Compensation, Benefits & Work/Life Balance +1
Facilities -9
Policies, Resources & Efficiency
Shared Governance -6
Pride
Supervisors/Department Chairs
+11
Senior Leadership -5
Faculty, Administration & Staff Relations +3
Communication +4
Collaboration
Fairness
Respect & Appreciation
SURVEY AVERAGE
Poor:
0% - 44%
Warrants Attention:
45% - 54%
Fair to Mediocre:
55% - 64%
Good:
65% - 74%
Very Good to Excellent:
75% - 100% 6 4

13. Moving Forward Share Results to Management Council on Aug 30th
Report Results with Trustees – College Environment Committee on Sept 15th
Publish Results on Website for Presidential Address on Sept 20th
Additional (non-standard) Reports from Modern Think
Conference Call with Modern Think Consultant
Establish a Task Force to Assess Survey Results and Action Strategies

14. Thank You!