Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMervin Goodman Modified over 6 years ago
1
Acknowledgement: NIH/NICHD #1 R21 HD061021-Elias Mpofu –PI
Personal and parental religiosity influences on safer-sex behaviour among Pentecostal Botswana youth Cleo Protogerou¹ ² E. Mpofu³, F. Nkomazanaª, M. Dubeª, O. Nkomazanaª ¹University of Liverpool, UK, ²University of Cape Town, South Africa, ³University of Sydney, Australia, ªUniversity of Botswana, Botswana. Acknowledgement: NIH/NICHD #1 R21 HD Elias Mpofu –PI
2
Botswana 2013 Global AIDS Response Report
HIV Prevalence by Residence Location 319,750 HIV infections (2.1 million population) HIV prevalence rates: general population: 18.5% females at 19.2% males 14.1%, highest: 30.4% in women aged Botswana AIDS Impact Survey IV (BAIS IV, 2013)
3
Religiosity & Safer-sex
80% of Botswana youth are affiliated with the Pentecostal church (Botswana Christian Council, 2003). Religiosity : Adherence to beliefs, practices, and/or moral conducts of a faith ,and active engagement in its rituals (Miller & Thoresen, 2003). Consistently linked to better psycho-physical health and less risk-taking. May have protective effects on HIV risk .
4
The present study Research questions
Would religiosity (intrinsic - extrinsic; personal - parental) associate with safer-sex behaviour? Would demographics of interest (age, gender, length of time affiliated with the church & congregation, place of residence, & educational level) moderate the religiosity – safer sex behaviour relationship? Would impulsivity mediate the religiosity – safer sex behaviour relationship?
5
Method: Setting, sampling, design
A major Pentecostal Church (8 / 26 congregations). Stratified random sampling for congregation size and location. N = 261 youth. Ethics approval from the Universities of Botswana & Sydney. Cross-sectional design. The Botswana Youth Health Survey (Mpofu, Nkomazana, & Ntinda, 2010).
6
Measures: The Botswana Youth Health Survey (Mpofu, Nkomazana, & Ntinda, 2010)
Demographics. Personal religiosity & perceived parental religiosity. Intrinsic - extrinsic religiosity dimensions. Health and risk-taking measures. Safer-sex measures: Perceived confidence in engaging in safer-sex behaviours (non-behavioural measure). Actual engagement in safer-sex behaviours (behavioural measure).
7
Measures: The Sensation-seeking and Impulsive Decision-making scale (Donohew et al., 2000).
Impulsivity items: increased sense of urgency and diminished premeditation.
8
Questionnaire item examples
Botswana Youth Health Survey Impulsive Decision-making scale How often do you attend: church services, church choir, bible study... How often do you: meditate, pray, ask for guidance... How often does your mother / father attend church services, talk about faith... I feel confident talking about STIs / AIDS prevention with a sexual partner. My sexual partner and I use condoms in sexual intercourse. I do the first thing that comes into mind. I act on the spur of the moment. I like to do things as soon as I think about them.
9
Data analyses Descriptives.
Hierarchical regression analysis with the PROCESS macro for SPSS (Hayes, 2009; 2013). Mediation analyses: direct and indirect effects computed using a series of ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions and the bootstrapping procedure (Preacher & Hayes, 2004; 2008). IBM SPSS version 22.
10
Results Key participant characteristics
Sexually active = 68 55% use condoms Female = 169 (64.8%) Age range = 12-23 Living in urban areas = 188 (72%) Students = 212 (81.2%) Secondary education = 145 (55.6%)
11
Results & Discussion Personal religiosity influences
Personal religiosity (composite ) was positively associated with confidence in engaging in safer sex for younger participants [b = 4.14, 95% CI (1.54, 6.74), t = 3.27, p < .01]. Church choir participation was linked to perceived (r = .41, p < .05) and actual (r = .35, p < .05) safer-sex engagement - all participants.
12
Results & Discussion Paternal religiosity influences
Confidence in engaging in safer-sex was higher for participants who believed that their fathers based everyday decisions on religion (M = 2.52, SD = .86), than not [M = 1.61, SD = .74, t (7) = -2.33, p < .05 (two-tailed)]. Intrinsic paternal religiosity was consistently positively associated with confidence in safer-sex engagement.
13
Results & Discussion Maternal religiosity influences
Confidence in engaging in safer-sex behaviours was inversely associated with: the extent to which mothers talked about religion and the church (r = -.325, p < .05); the extent to which mothers were perceived as basing every day decisions and actions on religious beliefs (r = -.30, p < .05). Patriarchal context.
14
Results & Discussion The impact of impulsivity
Parental religiosity influences on safer sex engagement (perceived & actual) through impulsivity were negative, i.e., higher levels of participant impulsivity diminished the impact of parental religiosity on safer sex. 𝜅² effect sizes between small and medium ( 𝜅² = .065 for the non-behavioural; 𝜅² =.092 for the behavioural outcome). Personal dispositions are at play.
15
Results & Discussion Demographic influences
Urban place of residence linked to perceived safer-sex (r = .32, p < .03). Safer-sex behaviour was higher for participants living in a in urban location (M = 2.07, SD = 1.40), than in a rural setting [M = 1.40, SD = 1.02, t (36) = -1.88, p = .06 (two-tailed)].
16
To recap… Safer-sex engagement was linked to:
Personal religiosity - participating in church music and dance. Father religiosity – especially intrinsic. Living in an urban location. Younger participants. Religiosity influences on safer-sex were explained, at least partly, by impulsivity.
17
Insights for safe-sex promotion with the Pentecostal Botswana youth
Participating in & consuming church music, song, and dance. Tailoring interventions as a function of age and sexual experience. Including fathers and other male role models in safe-sex interventions, capitalizing on the influence exerted by father religiosity.
18
Thank you for being here!
Cleo Protogerou, PhD Department of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, UK & Department of Psychology, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.