1. FIELDS Mission Assurance Manager University of California, Berkeley
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS SCM Instrument Pre-Ship Review Safety and Mission Assurance
Jorg Fischer
FIELDS Mission Assurance Manager University of California, Berkeley

2. FIELDS – Waivers Safety – no issues
Waivers are presented by the FIELDS SE, Keith Goetz
ABML delivered
ABPL delivered
FMEA delivered
EIDP provided by the SCM team
NCR_011 closed with delivery of FM2
The disposition and status of previous anomalies, deviations, and waivers for FIELDS have been assessed by JHU APL and UCB SSL SMA in their entirety and the identified risks are acceptable to proceeding.

3. FIELDS – Verifications, GIDEP
Verifications, Inspections, Overview
JHU APL, UCB SSL QA/SMA – on site, as needed
Verifications per SMA Matrix performed with JHU APL SAM
MIPs performed by JHU APL – no issues
GIDEP and Alerts status – up to date
Closed loop process in place, up-to-date, no issues
SPP_GIDEP_ALERTS
Total: 325 of 324 items closed for FIELDS
1 open, item 258, NASA Advisory : NA-GSFC (Dielectric Rupture Due to Protons in Components Incorporating High-Z Elements. It requires project radiation assessment) – JHU APL/GSFC review is in progress.
Facilities/Training
Facilities are ready for S/C integration and have been reviewed by JHU APL SMA. UCB SSL personnel completed JHU APL training for Magnetic Cleanliness, Cleanroom Protocol, and ESD Training.

4. SMA is ready to support the shipment of the instrument.
iPSR FIELDS – SMA
Shipping will be supported by QA personnel
Review/Approved Shipping Documents
ME review of shipping containers
Monitor formal shipping events
QA present for all critical shipping operations – moves, lifts.
SMA is ready to support the shipment of the instrument.

5. iPSR FIELDS – SMA
BACKUP SLIDES

6. FIELDS – SAFETY
Hazard Descriptions:
Acceleration: The Antennas deploy at a rate of approximately 18 degrees per second. A deployment takes approximately 6 seconds. While stowed on the spacecraft, non-flight restraints will prevent accidental deployment. The energy stored in each spring in the stowed configuration is 840 lb-in (95 J), but the hard stop of the antenna prevents the spring from unwinding all the way. The deployed mass is 248 grams. Pressure: Only Nitrogen doers. All personnel handling Ni is trained and certified by UCB EH&S. Training cert records are available for review, through SMA
Temperature: All operators for solder operations are trained by NASA JPL and certified by FIELDS SMA.
Hazardous Materials: UCB and JHU APL have appropriate hazardous materials storage and SDS available for polymeric materials and alcohol and follow required safety procedures.

7. FIELDS – Waivers Waivers/Deviations generated before Integration:
CCR_008 – SPF_CCR_008_SCM_Thermal_Cycling. Affected Items: FIELDS SCM sensor
Requirement: SPP Environmental Design and Test Requirements Document ( ), Section requires thermal vacuum cycling testing on SCM sensor component.
Description of Change: The thermal cycling test in vacuum for SCM is a difficult test to perform. The sensor electronics is designed to be thermally isolated from the mag boom itself, from the sensor’s mounting hardware and from vacuum chamber thermal control plates. With such weak thermal coupling, we expect cycling in vacuum to take an unreasonably long time. Testing in air will speed the process markedly (e.g. 6h per cycle as opposed to 24+h per cycle).
Deviation: Modify the requirement to allow thermal cycling in air as a substitute for thermal vacuum cycling. It would be expected to run more cycles and at more extreme temperatures. As follows: SCM 12 cycles in air from -60C (TBC) to +80C (heater set point is -50C)
Rationale/Justification for Change (include names of peer reviewers): Cycling this sensor in vacuum would be very difficult. Cycling this sensor in air is straightforward and gives acceptable results.
Risk Assessment: FIELDS believes that thermal cycling in air would actually be more effective at revealing workmanship problems in a limited duration test. The SCM sensor includes a number of EEE parts – all fully encapsulated in the 3d-Plus preamplifier structure. As such, testing in air with reasonable dwell times at temperature extremes will give good workmanship results.
Waivers are presented by the Systems Engineer, Keith Goetz

8. FIELDS – JHU APL Training
JHU APL Training Completed as of 4/3/17
ESD Training
Cleanroom Protocol
Magnetic Cleanliness
Robert Abiad
Greg Dalton
Dave Curtis
Bill Donakowski
Jose Fermin
Jorg Fischer
Davin Larson
Roberto Livi
David Glaser
Tony Mercer
Miles Robinson
Christopher Scholz
Gayle Martin
Amanda Slagle
Chris Scholz
Phyllis Whittlesey
Daniele Meilhan 
Brent Mochizuki
Marc Pulupa
Tim Quinn
Chris Tiu

9. FIELDS – SMA VERIFICATION
SMA MATRIX Requirements Verification
File: SPF-SMA-01B_ RevB_Matrix_Verification