Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
How to Design an Insurance Exchange?
2
2014: Open enrollment: Oct 31,2013-March 31,2014
Last minute extensions up through mid-April 8 Million signed up during open enrollment 5.4 in federal exchange 2.6 in state-run exchanges 2.2 million are young adults (18-34) 3.8 million enrolled in the March Surge 1.2 million young adults
5
What plan did they buy? Total State-run Federal-run
6
2015 (so far) Open enrollment: Nov 15-Feb 15
As of 2/11: 7.75m signed up via HealthCare.gov (37 states) 275,000 signed up between 1/31-2/6 alone Additional 2.4m over 2014 have signed up via state-run exchanges (13 states+DC) Obama’s facebook video (2/17) – 11.4 million enrollees CBO Target: 12 million; Obama target: 9.1 million Source:
7
2015 (so far) Average subsidy (healthcare.gov): $268 per month
People paying ¼ of premium King v. Burwell – Arguments March 4 RWJ estimates 8.2 million would not have health insurance if they get rid of the subsidy on the federal exchange
8
How did you get non-group insurance before the exchange?
9
Pre-ACA: Disorganized marketplace
Any insurance company can offer (subject to state-specific regulations on price/acceptance) Insurance company largely in charge of design No central information about who is participating in the market/price Little risk-adjustment, so lots of incentive for insurance company to “cherry-pick” or “cream-skim” Pre-existing conditions clauses, active marketing. No mandate, so insurance pool is relatively high risk No meaningful cost containment/price limitations
10
How to Manage Competition
Set structure Have companies bid to participate Price, quality, (name recognition) Transparency Public plan option?
11
Risk Adjustment Try to avoid cream-skimming
Part C: offices on the 6th floor walk-up NL: over-reimbursed diabetes care intentionally CH: Unsophisticated formula doesn’t work; USA: we don’t have good data on new enrollees to do a sophisticated one. Exclusive market vs. competing market
12
Enforcement IRS= FEAR. Eligibility: could change on a monthly basis.
Buettgens, Nichols and Dorn 2012 6.9m Medicaid <-> Exchange 19.5m Medicaid <-> Ineligibility for subsidies 3m Exchange <-> ineligibility for subsidies Total: 31% of the Medicaid+Exchange eligible
13
Quality Of Insurance: Minimum creditable coverage
Federal standards (as of now) NL: Elected officials MUST take the minimum benefit Can help with risk sharing Of care/care delivery: Need data Right measures Nursing Home Compare
14
MA, NL, and CH Need to reform health care purchasing market
Payment structure Global payments (NL, BCBS) Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) Selective contracting? ACA: Publish standard charges – enough? Are insurers the right ones to get cost containment? Do they have the tools? Do they have the bargaining power? Now, or after ACOs? How much power does the exchange board have to negotiate with insurance companies?
15
Federal vs. State-level exchange?
Bargaining power of the exchange vs insurance companies vs hospitals Ability to pool risk
16
How do people chose plans on the exchange?
NL: very few people switch => must be optimum Abaluck and Gruber (2011): Part D: many ex-post sub-optimal decisions Ericson and Starc: Why bronze/silver/gold? They don’t look like ESI purchasers Maybe room for heuristics, but not definitive Significant Heterogeneity in the price sensitivity by age
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.