Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Prechill vs. Non Prechill
Kentucky Bluegrass Prechill vs. Non Prechill
2
AOSA Rules Petri dish 15C – 25C Light Preliminary Count 10 days
Final Count 21 days Potassium Nitrate Prechill at 10C for 5 days
3
Objective of the Referee
Comparing germination percentage between prechill and non prechill Whether one method has an advantage over the other To survey the uniformity among participant laboratories
4
Sample A Was harvest in August 2013 Claimed 85% Germination
5
Sample A Week 1
6
Week 2
7
Final Week
8
Sample B Was harvested in August 2012 Claimed 85% Germination
9
B Sample Results Week 1
10
Week 2
11
Final Week
12
Sample C Was harvested in December 2010 Claimed 80% Germination
13
C Sample Results Week 1
14
Week 2
15
Final Week
16
Combined Data Results There were 16 total participants
Result is the average of all the participants data for each sample Result was compared between prechilled vs non prechilled samples
17
Prechill vs Non Prechill
18
Analysis df Mean F Source of variation Square Value Prob
A N A L Y S I S O F V A R I A N C E T A B L E df Mean F Source of variation Square Value Prob Labs (L) *** Seed Lots (SL) *** Chill va no-chill (C) ns (SL) x (C) ns Error Coefficient of Variation: 3.78%
19
Conclusions Noticed higher germination percentages during the first week for prechilled samples Prechilling treatment did not have significant impact on the germination percentage
20
Special Thank You Thank you to all participants
Dr. Elias Sabry from Oregon State University for data analysis Seedway LLC, especially Jason Perrault for providing the samples Nishit Patel from PA Seed Laboratory for putting the samples together.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.