Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Forensic Psychology and the Law A Canadian Perspective

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Forensic Psychology and the Law A Canadian Perspective"— Presentation transcript:

1 Forensic Psychology and the Law A Canadian Perspective
Ronald Roesch, Simon Fraser University Patricia A. Zapf, City University of New York Stephen D. Hart, Simon Fraser University Deborah A. Connolly, Simon Fraser University PowerPoint Slides revised by Angela Book, Brock University

2 Chapter 6 Children and the Law

3 Learning Objectives 6.1 Summarize the recent history of children as witnesses. 6.2 Outline the strengths and weaknesses of children as witnesses. 6.3 Outline the recommendations for interviewing child witnesses. 6.4 Explain how courts determine the competence of children as witnesses in criminal court. 6.5 Explain why credibility of children is important and how it is evaluated. 6.6 Explain how Canadian criminal courts accommodate child witnesses.

4 (Recent) History of Child Witnesses
Three significant obstacles when prosecuting based on child witnesses: Recent Complaint Doctrine (until 1983) Courts had to be made aware that there are dangers to convict based on uncorroborated evidence Pervasive attitude that child witnesses are unreliable In the 1980s, increased research on child witnesses and changes in laws allowing children to be witnesses

5 Children’s Suggestibility
Defined as: “the degree to which encoding, storage, retrieval, and reporting of events can be influenced by a range of social and psychological factors” Children are susceptible to biases and peer influences

6 Interviews with Children
Core objectives are to identify (a) the occurrence of child maltreatment and (b) whether an allegation is false Characteristics of a good interview: Child friendly setting Supportive environment Build rapport in a practice interview Set ground rules ahead of time Objective and neutral Avoid use of suggestion Appropriate question format Close by thanking the child and have them ask questions

7 Interviews with Children
50% of sexual offence cases involving child victims involve repeated abuse Repeated victims are seen as less credible because events are spread out over time Interview needs to be modified In practice interview, use a nonthreatening event that has occurred repeatedly Ask about a specific instance of abuse in actual interview

8 Competence of Child Witnesses
Competence refers to whether a witness is allowed to testify in court Before 2006, child witnesses underwent a competency inquiry The Truth-Lie Discussion Abolished in Canada

9 Credibility of Children
Credibility refers to the weighting of testimony in court Includes two concepts: perceived honesty and cognitive ability Younger children are seen as more credible Statement Validity Analysis Three components: 1) structured interview, 2) criterion-based content analysis (CBCA), 3) validity checklist Alternative approach to credibility assessment: reality monitoring

10 Testimonial Supports Meant to lessen traumatic nature of testifying for children Include testifying via closed circuit television or behind a screen Criminal Code of Canada allows aids to be used Judge decides whether use of such aids interferes with court proceedings

11 Testimonial Supports One major source of stress is facing the accused in the courtroom, which is reduced with the use of testimonial aids In Canada, the accused doesn’t have the right to face the accuser, so allowing testimonial aids, such as CCTV, does not infringe on the accused’s right to a fair trial Is the case biased by use of aids? Children are more accurate and provide more information when testifying via CCTV Perceptions of accuracy are lower (may reduce likelihood of conviction

12 Testimonial Supports Sources of Stress for Child Witnesses
Facing the accused in the courtroom Lack of maternal support Testifying on several occasions Lack of corroboration Lengthy cross-examination

13 Child Advocacy Centres
Canada has six Child Advocacy Centres and 19 being developed Multidisciplinary approach Law enforcement Child protection Prosecution Mental health support Advocacy Forensic Interviewing Medical Evaluations

14 Summary Before the 1980s, there were several obstacles in prosecutions relying on child witnesses In the 1980’s there was an increase in research on child witnesses and changes in the law that allowed children to be witnesses Children are more susceptible to suggestion than adults, and special interviewing techniques have been developed to avoid use of suggestion

15 Summary Characteristics of a good interview include having a child friendly/supportive environment, remaining objective, and using open-ended questions (to avoid suggestion) Children testifying before 2006 had to undergo a “competency inquiry” that decided whether the child was allowed to testify in court Credibility of child witnesses can be evaluated using the Statement Validity Analysis, CBCA, or Reality Monitoring

16 Summary Testimonial aids are used for children if deemed appropriate by a judge testifying via closed-circuit television or behind a screen Criminal Code of Canada allows aids to be used if the witness is less than 18 years old Aids do not infringe on the right to a fair trial Stress on the child witness is reduced when testimonial aids are utilized children testifying via CCTV are seen as less accurate, possibly reducing the likelihood of conviction Child Advocacy Centres in Canada have a multidisciplinary approach

17 Web Links Department of Justice, Canada. (2011). Child and youth victims and witnesses of crime in Canada. Retrieved from information/reports-and-discussion-papers. Centre for Children and Families in the Justice System: Child and Youth Advocacy Centres: cae.ca/.

18 Copyright Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Access Copyright (The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency) is unlawful. Requests for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his or her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The author and the publisher assume no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages caused by the use of these programs or from the use of the information contained herein.


Download ppt "Forensic Psychology and the Law A Canadian Perspective"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google