Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Lessons from Little Bangs on Long Island
Steven Manly Univ. of Rochester Yale Physics Club May 9, 2003 Not a systematic review of RHIC or PHOBOS results. More a personal tour of what I find interesting. Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
2
Physics Club, Yale University
May 9, 2003
3
Inquiring minds want to know ...
Yo! What holds it together? Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
4
leptons quarks Gauge bosons u c t d s b e e e W, Z, , g, G
Strong interaction Hadrons Baryons qqq qq mesons p = uud n = udd K = us or us = ud or ud nuclei atoms Electromagnetic interaction Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
5
What forces exist in nature?
What is a force? How do they interact? How do forces change with energy or temperature? How has the universe evolved? Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
6
Similar to QED … But ... Gauge field carries the charge
Quantum Chromodynamics - QCD q q qq Similar to QED … But ... Gauge field carries the charge distance energy density, temperature relative strength asymptotic freedom q q qq qq confinement Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
7
From D.H. Perkins, Intro. to High Energy Physics
Why do we believe QCD is a good description of the strong interaction? Deep inelastic scattering: There are quarks. From D.H. Perkins, Intro. to High Energy Physics Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
8
Why do we believe QCD is a good description of the strong interaction?
No direct observation of quarks: confinement Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
9
Need the “color” degree of freedom
Why do we believe QCD is a good description of the strong interaction? Need the “color” degree of freedom P. Burrows, SLAC-PUB7434, 1997 R. Marshall, Z. Phys. C43 (1989) 595 Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
10
Why do we believe QCD is a good description of the strong interaction?
e+e- Zo qq e+e- Zo qqg Event shapes Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
11
Why do we believe QCD is a good description of the strong interaction?
Measure the coupling P. Burrows, SLAC-PUB7434, 1997 Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
12
Strong interaction is part of our heritage
Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
13
Chiral symmetry breaking: the “other” source of mass
A naïve view … Quark condensate qq qq qq qq qq qq QCD vacuum Strongly interacting particles interact with the vacuum condensate … which makes them much heavier than the constituent quark masses. q Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
14
Physics Club, Yale University
May 9, 2003
15
Relativistic heavy ions
AGS: fixed target, 4.8 GeV/nucleon pair SPS: fixed target, 17 GeV/nucleon pair RHIC: collider, 200 GeV/nucleon pair LHC: collider, 5.4 TeV/nucleon pair Two concentric superconducting magnet rings, 3.8 km circum. A-A (up to Au), p-A, p-p collisions, eventual polarized protons Funded by U.S. Dept. of Energy $616 million Construction began Jan. 1991, first collisions June 2000 Annual operating cost $100 million Reached 10% of design luminosity in 2000 (1st physics run)!! Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
16
The view from above Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
17
STAR Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
18
Au-Au collision in the STAR detector
Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
19
Isometric of PHENIX Detector
Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
20
Brahms experiment From F.Videbœk Physics Club, Yale University
May 9, 2003
21
The PHOBOS Detector (2001) z y x q f ZDC Paddle Trigger Counter
Ring Counters Time of Flight Spectrometer Vertex Octagon 1m Cerenkov 4p Multiplicity Array - Octagon, Vertex & Ring Counters Mid-rapidity Spectrometer TOF wall for high-momentum PID Triggering Scintillator Paddles Counters Zero Degree Calorimeter (ZDC) z y x q f silicon pad readout channels Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
22
Central Part of the Detector
(not to scale) 0.5m Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
23
Au-Au event in the PHOBOS detector
Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
24
The goals Establish/characterize the expected QCD deconfinement phase transition quarks+gluons hadrons Establish/characterize changes in the QCD vacuum at high energies: chiral symmetry restoration and/or disoriented chiral condensates Understand the nuclear eqn. of state at high energy density Polarized proton physics Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
25
Terminology: angles Beamline Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
26
Terminology: angles Pseudorapidity = = Lorentz invariant angle with repect to the beampipe -3 +3 -2 +2 Beamline +1 -1 Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
27
= azimuthal angle about the beampipe
Terminology: angles = azimuthal angle about the beampipe Beamline Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
28
Zero-degree Calorimeter
Terminology: centrality peripheral collisions central collisions Nch “Spectators” Zero-degree Calorimeter “Participants” 6% Paddle Counter “Spectators” Npart Thanks to P. Steinberg for constructing much of this slide Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
29
Signatures/observables
Strange particle enhancement and particle yields Temperature J/ and ’ production/suppression Vector meson masses and widths identical particle quantum correlations DCC - isospin fluctuations Flow of particles/energy (azimuthal asymmetries) jet quenching Measured value Energy density or number of participants Each variable has different experimental systematics and model dependences on extraction and interpretation MUST CORRELATE VARIABLES Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
30
RHIC operation Run 1 12 June, 2000: 1st Collisions @ s = 56 AGeV
July 2001: 1st s = 200 AGeV Dec. 23, 2002: 1st d-Au s = 200 AGeV Run 2 Run 3 Peak Au-Au luminosity = 5x1026 cm-2s-1 Design Au-Au luminosity = 2x1026 cm-2s-1 Ave luminosity for last week of ‘02 run = 0.4x1026 cm-2s-1 Run 2: Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
31
From Thomas Roser Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
32
From Thomas Roser Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
33
Results from RHIC! Energy flow, Particle multiplicity high energy density Particle production QCD is QCD is QCD Large flow, species yields equilibration/thermalization Spectra, flow, jets Jet quenching Not talking about Bose-Einstein correlations, strangeness enhancement, J/ suppression, balance function, direct photon production, mass shifts, width shifts, etc. Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
34
Energy density of proton and lattice QCD calculations
Expect deconfinement phase transition to occur at an energy density of 1-2 GeV/fm3 Experimental results at RHIC imply 5 GeV/fm3 PHENIX Collaboration, PRL 87 (2001) 4.6 GeV/fm3 Assumes R=size of Au nucleus and To=1fm/c Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
35
Basic systematics of particle production
PHOBOS Data on dN/dh in Au+Au vs Centrality and s dN/dh h 19.6 GeV 130 GeV 200 GeV Preliminary PHOBOS Typical systematic band (90%C.L.) Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
36
Systematic errors not shown
Energy Dependence of Central dN/dh Scale by Npart/2 & shift to h¢=h- ybeam 19.6 GeV is preliminary 19.6 GeV is preliminary Systematic errors not shown PHOBOS Au+Au dNch/dh ¢/<Npart> dNch/dh 6% central Once you are smashed by a fast moving wall of bricks, it doesn’t make much difference if the bricks are going a little faster. That only determines how far your parts are spread along the path. The “fragmentation region” extent grows with sNN Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
37
Universality of particle production
(Mueller 1983) From P.Steinberg Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
38
Universality of particle production
pp/pp A+A e+e- From P.Steinberg Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
39
Universality of particle production
p+pp+X : Universality e+e- Au+Au pp From P.Steinberg Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
40
Elliptic flow Collision region is an extruded football/rugby ball shape Central Peripheral Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
41
Elliptic flow b (reaction plane)
Determine to what extent is the initial state spatial/momentum anisotropy is mapped into the final state. dN/d(f -YR ) = N0 (1 + 2V1cos (f-YR) + 2V2cos (2(f-YR) ) Sensitive to the initial equation of state and the degree of equilibration. Affects other variables, such as HBT and spectra. Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
42
b (reaction plane) Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
43
Elliptic Flow at 130 GeV Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 222301 (2002)
(PHOBOS : Normalized Paddle Signal) Hydrodynamic limit STAR: PRL86 (2001) 402 PHOBOS preliminary Thanks to M. Kaneta Phys. Rev. Lett (2002) Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
44
(consider velocity and early, self-quenching asymmetry)
Flow vs Pt and Hydro describes low pt vs. particle mass, fails at high pt and high- (consider velocity and early, self-quenching asymmetry) T. Hirano Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
45
Chemical equilibration and freezeout temperature
M. Kaneta, STAR Collaboration LEP F. Becattini, hep-ph/ Thermal models can describe data VERY well. Thermal model lets us put data on QCD phase diagram RHIC energies appear close to Tc Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
46
Spectra The fun starts when one compares this to pp spectra
0.2<yp <1.4 STAR results, shown at QM02 Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
47
Comparing Au+Au and pp Spectra
_ Comparing Au+Au and pp Spectra Production of high pT particles dominated by hard scattering High pT yield prop. to Ncoll (binary collision scaling) Compare to pp spectra scaled up by Ncoll Violation of Ncoll scaling Jet quenching? Au+Au _ Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
48
Suppression in Hadron Spectra
Show 130 GeV suppression in RAA plot. Shown by T. Peltzmann at QM02 Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
49
Jet-quenching: hard parton interacts with medium, which softens the momentum spectrum in A-A relative to pp Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
50
Peripheral Au+Au data vs. pp+flow
Count tracks around very high pT particle STAR, David Hartke - shown at QM02 Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
51
Central Au+Au data vs. pp+flow
Away side jet disappears!! STAR, David Hartke - shown at QM02 Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
52
Jet-quenching also gives break in flow vs. pT
Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
53
Initial state vs. final state effects
Jet-quenching is a final state effect - “Weisaker-Williams” color field of parton interacting with colored medium. Energy loss is medium-size dependent (radiated wavelengths less than source size) Initial state effect - saturation models color glass condensate (recent review: Iancu, Leonidov, McLerran, hep-ph/ ) can also qualitatively explain some features of the data Current d-Au run will help untangle this mess! Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
54
RHIC/experiments running very well
Showed you too much - I apologize Showed you too little - I apologize What are the lessons? RHIC/experiments running very well Up till now … characterization and refinement of models Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
55
Hot, dense, opaque medium is formed
Energy density above lattice predictions for deconfined state Local thermal equilibrium achieved Full 3-d structure away from mid-rapidity not yet understood Interesting signals being pursued … jet-quenching? Is it a duck? Perhaps standing on the precipice of a claim/discovery Remains to be seen if systematic study and pursuit of the surprises leads to anything beyond the duck! Future = statistics (J/+ more), vary species/energies, LHC Physics Club, Yale University May 9, 2003
56
Physics Club, Yale University
May 9, 2003
57
Physics Club, Yale University
May 9, 2003
58
Physics Club, Yale University
May 9, 2003
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.