1. Employment and Labour Law
Law Cases
Phd in Law Rustem Nazmetdinov

2. Case 1
Head of HR organization at the conclusion of the employment contract of the plant engineering and economic foreman requested the following documents: passport; work book; copy of the document of higher or secondary vocational education; response to the last place of work; proof of residence.
Study article 65 of Russian Labour Code and answer what documents can require employer from employee during employment procedure?

3. Case 2
Nekrasov was employed in the organization as an economist. The employment contract of Nekrasov set up next provisions: the day beginning of work - On March 20th, the position - economist, the monthly salary. April 17th Nekrasov was informed about termination of his employment contract as a result of an unsatisfactory result of probation.
Study article 70, 71 of Russian Labour Code and answer the following question? Does the employer violate labour legislation? How is set up probation period?

4. Case 3
For Kazakov was set up a monthly probation period. At the employer’s direction he started his work 12th of April while in the employment contract was include that the day beginning of work is 15th of April. On May 14 Kazakov was terminated the employment contract due to the fact that he failed probation period.
Study article 70, 71 of Russian Labour Code and answer the following question? Does the employer violate labour legislation? How is set up probation period?

5. Case 4
On February 8 with engineer of the plant Aleshkin employment contract was terminated due to his transfer to another job at the Research Institute. On February 10 Aleshkin appeared in the Institute, where he was denied to conclude employment because his position was reduced. Aleshkin went to court. Study article 64 of Russian Labour Code.
Who is right in this situation? What solution do you think will take the court? What guaranties is set up by Labour Code during conclusion of the employment contract?

6. Case 5
The organization has five barbershop. Svetlanova worked as a barber in barbershop N 1. She was transferred to hairdressing salon N 3 without her written consent. Svetlanova refused to be transferred as a hairdresser N 3, because is far from her residence. She appealed to the court and ask to return her to previous position (to the barbershop N 1).
Whether this claim should be satisfy? Study 72.1, of Labour Code.