Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRhoda Sullivan Modified over 6 years ago
1
ASPEN: Prolonged PFS With Sunitinib vs Everolimus in Nonclear-Cell RCC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2, 2015 *CCO is an independent medical education company that provides state-of-the-art medical information to healthcare professionals through conference coverage and other educational programs. PFS, progression-free survival; RCC, renal cell carcinoma. This program is supported by educational grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Genentech, Incyte, and Novartis.
2
ASPEN: Background Limited evidence for treatment of heterogeneous population of NCRCC Randomized trials needed to develop standard of care Previous evidence that temsirolimus prolonged OS vs interferon in NCRCC[1] ASPEN: randomized phase II trial comparing everolimus vs sunitinib in metastatic NCRCC[2] Largest randomized trial in NCRCC to date Designed to inform practice and explore predictive biomarkers NCRCC, nonclear-cell renal cell carcinoma; OS, overall survival. 1. Hudes G, et al. N Engl J Med. 2007;356: Armstrong AJ, et al. ASCO Abstract 4507.
3
ASPEN: Everolimus vs Sunitinib in NCRCC
Stratified by histology (papillary vs chromophobe vs unclassified), MSKCC risk group Everolimus 10 mg QD daily in 6-wk cycles (n = 57) Untreated pts with metastatic NCRCC, KPS ≥ 60 (N = 108) Sunitinib 50 mg QD Days 1-28 in 6-wk cycles (n = 51) CBR, clinical benefit rate; KPS, Karnofsky performance status; MSKCC, Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center; NCRCC, nonclear-cell renal cell carcinoma; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; QD, once daily; QoL, quality of life. Primary endpoint: radiographic PFS Secondary endpoints: OS; PFS at 6, 12, 24 mos; ORR; CBR; time to metastasis; QoL Armstrong AJ, et al. ASCO Abstract 4507.
4
ASPEN: Pt Baseline Characteristics
Sunitinib (n = 51) Everolimus (n = 57) Male, % 73 77 Median age, yrs (range) 59 (24-100) 64 (29-90) Papillary histology (type 1), % 65 (8) 65 (4) Chromophobe, % 20 11 Unclassified histology, % 16 23 Translocation carcinoma, % 12 4 Sarcomatoid differentiation, % 27 Prior nephrectomy, % 80 79 MSKCC risk group, % 1-2 ≥ 3 29 63 8 25 56 19 MSKCC, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Armstrong AJ, et al. ASCO Abstract 4507.
5
ASPEN: Progression-Free Survival
1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Sunitinib, median PFS 8.3 mos Everolimus, median PFS 5.6 mos Stratified log-rank HR 1.41, P = .16 < 0.20 boundary P value Probability of PFS NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival. 6 12 18 24 30 36 51 57 26 21 17 8 10 4 3 2 1 Sunitinib Everolimus Pts at Risk, n Mos Median OS: sunitinib vs everolimus: 32 (95% CI: 15-NR) vs 13 mos (95% CI: ) (HR: 1.12; P = .60) Armstrong AJ, et al. ASCO Abstract Reprinted with permission.
6
ASPEN: PFS by Prespecified Pt Subgroups
Category Median PFS (S vs. E, mos) HR (80% CI) Overall 8.3 vs. 5.6 1.41 ( ) Good risk 14 vs. 5.7 3.07 ( ) Int. Risk 6.5 vs. 4.9 1.38 ( ) Poor Risk 4.0 vs. 6.1 0.21 ( ) Papillary 8.1 vs. 5.5 1.52 ( ) Chromophobe 5.5 vs. 11.4 0.71 ( ) Unclassified 11.5 vs. 5.6 2.55 ( ) E, everolimus; PFS, progression-free survival; S, sunitinib. 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 HR and 80% CI Favors everolimus Favors sunitinib Armstrong AJ, et al. ASCO Abstract Reprinted with permission.
7
ASPEN: Tumor Response by RECIST 1.1
Sunitinib (n = 51) Everolimus (n = 57) Best overall response, % CR/PR SD PD Not evaluated 18 59 19 4 9 53 23 15 Clinical benefit response (CR + PR + SD ≥ 24 wks), % 22 11 Best tumor change, median % +10.7 +2.1 Median duration of response, mos 5.5 3.3 CR, complete response; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; SD, stable disease. Sunitinib associated with larger clinical response but more tumor growth Armstrong AJ, et al. ASCO Abstract 4507.
8
ASPEN: Select Adverse Events
Sunitinib (n = 51) Everolimus (n = 57) All Grade ≥ 3 Nausea 71 5.9 46 1.8 Diarrhea 67 9.8 30 Hypertension 45 23.5 11 Hand–foot syndrome 41 7.8 14 Stomatitis 28 47 8.8 Peripheral edema 16 2 26 Pneumonitis 18 Hypertriglyceridemia 5 Hyperglycemia 8 12 Everolimus: more discontinuations due to toxicity (23% vs 14%) Armstrong AJ, et al. ASCO Abstract 4507.
9
ASPEN: Conclusions Sunitinib significantly prolonged PFS compared to everolimus in previously untreated metastatic NCRCC Pts with MSKCC good/intermediate risk status, papillary histology, and unclassified subtype had improved PFS with sunitinib Pts with MSKCC poor risk status and chromophobe histology had improved PFS with everolimus Short survival times and low response rates to both agents highlight continuing medical need for new treatment approaches in this pt population MSKCC, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; NCRCC, nonclear-cell renal cell carcinoma; PFS, progression-free survival. Armstrong AJ, et al. ASCO Abstract 4507.
10
Go Online for More CCO Coverage of ASCO 2015!
Short slidesets of all the key data Additional CME-certified analyses with expert faculty commentary on all the key studies in: Gastrointestinal cancers Genitourinary cancer Hematologic malignancies Immunotherapy Lung cancer clinicaloptions.com/oncology
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.