1. Care Groups significantly reduce child mortality in Mozambique
Thomas P. Davis Jr., MPH
Director of Health Programs
Food for the Hungry
Anbrasi Edward, PhD, MPH
International Health, Johns Hopkins University

2. Food for the Hungry Background
Non-profit, faith-based private voluntary organization
Headquarters in Phoenix, AZ; WDC office
FH works in 26 of the poorest countries since 1971
Currently managing four USAID Title II projects with health components in Mozambique, Kenya, DRC, and Bolivia; PEPFAR ABY and privately-funded AIDS prevention work; & a USAID funded expanded impact child survival project in Mozambique.
Proven record of dramatic reductions in child malnutrition and deaths

3. Program Background
USAID Title II: FY98-FY01 (first DAP), FY02-FY07 (second DAP w/extension). Mortality study examined communities involved in both DAPs: 1999/2000 to 2003/2004.
Area: Nhamatanda, Marromeu, Gorongosa and Caia districts of Sofala Province, Mozambique. (Now scaling up to 10 districts through the USAID CSH grants program.)
Prime objective: Decrease chronic malnutrition in children 6-59 months of age + other behavior objectives (e.g., ↑EBF/PBF, ORT/feeding during diarrhea, DPT3).
Interventions: Child survival -- Nutrition, CDD, ARI, malaria, safe motherhood, HIV
Outpaced other Title II PVOs in Mozambique in terms of reductions in child malnutrition and speed of behavioral change

5. Characteristics of Care Groups
Groups of 10 households (HH) are established with women with children 0-59m of age through an initial census.
One Leader Mother is elected to represent each group of 10 HH.
Ten Leader Mothers meet in a Care Group, receiving 104 hours of training each year. Beneficiary mothers receive 13+ hours of training each year.
Each paid Promoter meets with about ten Care Groups every two weeks.
Turnover of Care Group Leader Mothers is generally low
Most training of CG members can be done at the community level (at low cost).

6. What happens during Care Group meetings?
Reporting of vital events and illnesses
Reporting on progress in health promotion, troubleshooting
Demonstration with flipchart/ posters of this week’s 2-3 health messages
Group reflection on the messages then practice
Other social activities (e.g,. songs, dramas, games)
Meetings generally last two hours

7. What happens after Care Group Meetings?
Each woman visits “her” 10 households in the following two weeks
Each woman educates her mothers on the key health and nutrition messages for the week using a small B&W flipchart.
“Key messages of the week” are almost always discussed, but CG members can work on mothers’ current concern
Sometimes CG members pair up
The Promoter supervises these home visits by CG members

8. What services are provided through the Care Group structure (aside from health promotion)?
Project staff members do other direct services through CGs:
Deworming
Vitamin A supplementation
(Sometimes Community IMCI consultations – not this project.)
Project staff members coordinate with MOH for provision of other PHC services:
Immunization
Clinical management of childhood illnesses

9. Mortality & Behavior Change Study Methods: Instruments
Baseline, Mini-KPC, and final KPC were described earlier (2004 APHA meeting).
Funding for the mortality study was made available from USAID via the CORE Group through their Diffusion of Innovations program.
Pregnancy history questionnaire: Modified from the 2003 Mozambique DHS birth history questionnaire.
Verbal Autopsy data was collected but has not been analyzed.
The 1997 baseline and 2001 knowledge, practice, and coverage surveys used a questionnaire that was developed using KPC modules from the Child Survival Technical Support group and the CORE Group.
The pregnancy history questionnaire was developed using the birth history questionnaire that was used in the recent Mozambique DHS 2003 survey. The survey team decided to go with pregnancy histories as birth histories are more likely to miss neonatal deaths. Background variables on sociodemographic characteristics were included in the survey along with retrospective questions regarding the number and outcome of pregnancies and surviving children. Standard procedures wre followed for ensuring the validity of the translation from English to Portuguese.
Cause of death for infants and children under 5 years was determined using standard verbal autopsy procedures described the WHO, but this VA data has not yet been analyzed due to a lack of funding, so we can only give the results in terms of changes in mortality rates rather than cause-specific mortality.

10. Sampling
1997 KPC: 300 mothers (cluster sampling); Mini-KPCs, 1,430 mothers (stratified random sampling); 2001 KPC, 435 mothers (cluster sampling).
Pregnancy History Questionnaire: 1,000 households assuming one women of reproductive age per HH
The baseline KPC survey in 1997 included 300 mothers and the final KPC in 2001 included 435 mothers using 30-cluster sampling. About 1,430 mothers were selected using stratified random sampling and interviewed for each mini-KPC using a shorter questionnaire that focused on promoted behaviors.
We used Fleiss’ formula to detect a 50% difference in mortality, from an estimated baseline level of 120 per 1,000 to 60 per 1,000, with an alpha level of 0.05 and power of Assuming that approximately 50% of the women had a birth in the last 3 years prior to the survey, the sample was estimated at 778 and then increased to 1,000 to accommodate for a 10% non-response rate. Multistage stratified random sampling was used. The number of HH sampled in each village was determined proportionate to the size of the village. At the village level, every second volunteer was selected and one HH from the 10 HH assigned to the volunteer was randomly selected for interview. In HH with more than one eligible woman, one was randomly selected.

11. Training, Data Collection, & Analysis
Pregnancy history survey conducted jointly by the district MoH, the National Institute of Statistics, and the CS project staff.
Six-person Interview teams: Four interviewers, one Supervisor, and one driver (similar to DHS design). Data collected over 10-day period in May 2004.
Data entry and analysis by the National Institute of Statistics following standard procedures (double data entry and consistency checks) using CSPro 2.6 and SPSS ver. 6.
Very high response rates since volunteers assisted survey team in locating the selected women.
Not all teams had someone from the National Institute of Statistics on them, but many did.

12. Results: KPC and Anthropometry (review)
Presented at 2004 meeting.
In general, large and rapid changes in key child survival behaviors.

18. Results: Mortality Rate Changes (U5MR)
(Possibly due to the Southern Africa famine, 2002)
62% decrease in U5MR

19. Results: Mortality Rate Changes (IMR)
42% decrease in IMR

20. Results: Mortality Rate Changes (CMR)
94% decrease in CMR

21. Project vs. Regional Changes in Mortality Rates
Project Changes
Regional Changes
Indicator
Mar 99 – Feb 00,
FH Project
Mar 03 – Feb 04, FH Project
Four-yr Change
’87-’97
Sofala (DHS)
‘93 – ‘03
Six-yr Change
Project vs. Regional
U5MR(FH) (DHS:5Q0)
107 41
-62%
242
205
-15.3%
3X better
IMR (FH)
(DHS: 1Q0) 66 38
-42%
173
149
-13.9%
2X better
CMR (FH)
(DHS:4Q1) 3
-94% 83
-20.5%
3.6X better
When we compare this to regional changes in these mortality rates based on the DHS, we see that the U5MR for the project decreased three times as much, the IMR decreased twice as much, and the CMR decreased almost four times as much as the regional rate.
Note: DHS data is for probability of death; FH project data are estimates of death.

22. What about cost per beneficiary??
The cost per beneficiary per year was $4.50 in this Care Group project. ($2,461,599/5/ 108,782).
FH has made additional changes to the model in its Expanded Impact Child Survival Project in Sofala Province, dropping the CPB to $3.21.

23. Other Evidence of Success of the CG Model
World Relief found a 49% reduction in the IMR and 42% reduction in the U5MR in their CG project between March 2000 and Feb 2003 in Gaza Province, Mozambique.

24. Who is using Care Groups?
Food for the Hungry in Mozambique and Kenya (and similar multiplier model for HIV/AIDS prevention in Ethiopia, Mozambique, Haiti, and Nigeria).
World Relief in Mozambique, Cambodia, Malawi, Burundi, Indonesia, and Rwanda.
Plan International in Kenya
Curamericas in Guatemala.
Red Cross in Cambodia
Africare in Angola
Salvation Army in Zambia

25. What about sustainability??
Of 1457 volunteers active at the end of WR’s Care Group project in Mozambique, 1361 (93%) were still active twenty months after the project ended.
Communities, on their own, replaced 40 of the 132 vacant volunteer positions.
Remaining Leader Mothers trained new Leader Mothers and gave them educational materials
Women in half of the households surveyed reported that their Leader Mother had visited their household within the last two weeks.

26. Sustainability of Final Indicator Levels 2
Sustainability of Final Indicator Levels 2.5 and Four-Years Post-Project in the WR-Mozambique Care Group Project: Home Care of Sick Children
(Note: End of Project was September Black line is project goal. Red line is actual indicator levels.)

27. Sustainability of Final Indicator Levels 2
Sustainability of Final Indicator Levels 2.5 and Four-Years Post-Project (WR-Mozambique Care Group Project): Preventive Services

28. And another example of rapid decreases in the U5MR in a project funded by the Child Survival and Health Grants Program in Haiti from 1999 to 2002.

29. Conclusions
Implementation of this health program – focused on child survival outcomes in Sofala province – resulted in extensive behavior change and improved health service coverage and utilization.
Dramatic declines in mortality rates as evidenced by the pregnancy history data. Attribution difficult to prove without rigorous field trials.
Currently seeking funding for more rigorous and scaled-up trials of the Care Group model.
NGO-led food security and CS health programs – using effective methods such as Care Groups – should be mobilized to help achieve MDG4.

31. Why are Care Groups so successful?
Possibly:
The unit of work and analysis is a neighborhood or part of a neighborhood instead of an entire community.
Social support is increased so fewer incentives are needed, drop-out is lower, less retraining is necessary, and more happens outside of meetings.
3) Tasks for community-level volunteers are light (i.e., one home visit per day on average).
4) Leader Mothers really know “their” households and are more invested in them.
5) More highly-trained health workers are used more efficiently in a multiplier model.
1. Builds on small groups of 8-14 members (similar to churches’ use of fast-growing cell groups and base communities).
3. “Doing less more often” is a useful strategy for populations where literacy is low.
4. Behavior change, and identification and follow-up of defaulters is easier.

32. Long-Term Trends in Infant Mortality in Haiti and in the Primary Health Care Service Area of Hôpital Albert Schweitzer,
This is just one of many examples of dramatic change in the under-five mortality rate brought on by involvement of nongovernmental organizations. Here’s a look at Hopital Albert Schweitzer’s reductions in the IMR from 1958 to 1999.