Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWhitney Poole Modified over 6 years ago
1
The Electoral Modernisation Programme in the United Kingdom
Paul Docker Head of Electoral Modernisation Department for Constitutional Affairs CoE Conference November 2006 1
2
Vision Multi-channel elections which: Meet needs of modern lifestyles
Improve access Maintain / increase security Improve administrative efficiency “A 21st century democracy should provide a variety of ways of voting that reflect modern lifestyles” e-Envoy; In the Service of Democracy – 2002 3
3
The UK approach Maintaining a healthy scepticism
Trials in binding elections Maintaining a healthy scepticism Relying heavily on independent evaluation and agreed standards (CoE) Developing robust systems & accreditation including use of EML Scaling up where opportunities allow and systems require 7
4
UK Government’s strategy
A first programme of pilots in binding elections to 2005 leading to extensive e-enabled: local government elections to 2010 Greater London Assembly elections Scottish Parliament, Welsh and Northern Ireland Assembly elections? European Parliamentary elections? and leading to an e-enabled general election 5
5
The benefits of piloting
Testing in a real world environment Learning lessons Building for the future: voter experience local authority appetite technical experience developing political will 11
6
Electoral Pilots - a brief history
Since enabling legislation in 2000 over 150 electoral pilot schemes involving some 100 local authorities 2003 Electoral Pilots covered over 6.4 million electors in 59 electoral pilots 17 (centrally funded) e-voting pilots delivering: Internet, kiosks, SMS, telephone and interactive digital TV 8
7
2003 Electoral Pilots Summary
1.4 million voters able to participate in e-voting pilots 27% of voters offered e-voting used the new methods available In comparable areas where piloting took place in 2002, voting using e channels increased by over 50% 2003 e-voting pilot areas had an average turnout of 37.5% compared to the national average of 33% 17
8
The ‘hiatus’ in 2004 and 2005 concentration on all-postal pilots Ministers keen to use gains in postal voting Coincided with Birmingham fraud issues General election - no power to pilot Need to address issues around postal voting became a priority 19
9
Pilot developments in May 2006
Concentrated on security and administrative changes plus e-counting pilots to improve the security of the election e.g. use of barcodes, signature checking (Contributed to Act in July 2006) ; pilots which improved access for electors, e.g. early voting, mobile voting and alternative polling locations; pilots which improved administrative efficiency e.g. electronic counting of traditional and/or postal ballots; 20
10
What we want to test Central Procurement
Direction to suppliers – e.g. pre-registration Testing what we want – e.g. different marks in e-counting, different languages, ensuring accuracy of ballot completion Procurement based on CoE Standards 2007 onwards we will pilot: traditional and additional polling stations Remote e-voting – Internet and Telephone voting ‘de-centralisation’ of voting to improve accessibility
11
E-voting - specific issues for UK
Fraud - increase in Postal Vote security requirements Maintaining public confidence in election systems Media and perceptions - UK and abroad Capacity of local authorities to deliver Supply -v- Demand - getting what we want not necessarily what is already available Political support 13
12
Conclusion Looking to push forward on e-voting We are focused on addressing the key issues in the current climate - security, perceptions first …. scalability later We are looking to learn from recent experiences Looking forward to working with you and others 25
13
Contacts: paul.docker@dca.gsi.gov.uk +44 (0)20 7210 8221
+44 (0) 26
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.