1. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Zinc mass material flow. Mass of zinc (m kg) cast.

2. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Collated annual data from the zinc die-making foundry

3. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Zinc machining power measurements (roughing: 19 kWh to remove 42.5 kg; finishing: 9.6 kWh to remove 2.5 kg)

4. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Zinc die-making sensitivity analysis

5. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Power profile during forming of seven-parts on the hydraulic press (750 ton loading)

6. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Power profile and die displacement for hydraulic press

7. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Power profile for forming of seven parts on the mechanical press

8. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Forming of one part using mechanical press

9. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Power profile for forming a part using a mechanical press. Loading of approximately 850 short ton.

10. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
The ecological impacts (Ixx) and costs (Cxx) of forming sheet metal parts

11. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Stamped aluminum case study parts: (a) aluminum hood (hydraulic press) and (b) aluminum tailgate (mechanical press)

12. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Environmental impacts from the hydraulic press (truck hood) case study: (a) CED, (b) GWP, and (c) human health impact

13. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Environmental impacts from the mechanical press (truck tailgate) case study: (a) CED, (b) GWP, and (c) human health impact

14. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Case study costs

15. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Blank area versus die size. Error bars: ± 45% of mass.

16. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Blank area versus die cost. Error bars: ±45% of cost.

17. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
Date of download: 10/19/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4): doi: /
Figure Legend:
The CED and cost for stamping an aluminum part: 1.5 m2 surface area, 1.5 mm thick: (a) CED and (b) cost