Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWesley Williams Modified over 6 years ago
1
Hillsborough County Schools Long Range School Plan
April 26, 2017
2
Background Economic downturn followed by recovery period
Study to address Growth Management issues: Future growth levels, timing & location Student generation rates Ability to accommodate new students Identify and prioritize future expansion sites by school level Prepare a Business Plan
3
Summary/Key Findings Annual Growth rate of 1.3% through 2045
Results in an average of 10,000 residential permits per year Most of this growth is in South County Expect 5,400 new students into District each year Student generation of all homes vs. new homes Impact of Charter Schools 1,350 of new students estimated to be absorbed by charter schools Most of this is elementary and middle students Three planning areas Minimum vs. Probable Scenarios Use of Portables/Redistricting Maintenance backlog / Debt Need for new revenue sources
4
Minimum Scenario Assumptions:
Schools are 200% of capacity prior to new construction Heavy portable usage Frequent redistricting Potential concurrency mitigation Operational changes Co-teaching Dual sessions
5
Probable Scenario Assumptions:
Schools are 150% of capacity prior to new construction Limited available capacity in surrounding schools to cover deficiency Reduced portable use Limited redistricting Some operational changes Co-teaching
6
Summary/Key Findings Total Schools Type Min Probable Elem 14 25 Middle
School Needs North/West Type Min Prob. ES 0 1 MS 0 0 HS 0 0 Total 0 1 School Needs North/East Type Min Probable ES 3 5 MS 0 0 HS 0 1 Total 3 6 Total Schools Type Min Probable Elem 14 25 Middle 3 5 High 6 8 Total 23 38 NK: What year is this map for? All three, 2022, 27, and 32 appear on clicks (Bottom Left Corner) 2017: 98% System Capacity 2022: Doby (105% System Capacity) 2027: Sessums, Doby, Reddick, Knights and Frost (109% System Capacity) 2032: Doby (2), Reddick, Cypress Creek, Stowers, Summerfield Crossings, Summerfield Elem and Knights (110% System Capacity) School Needs - South Type Min Probable ES 11 19 MS 3 5 HS 6 7 Total 20 31
7
Historical and Projected Growth for Hillsborough and Florida
Avg. Annual Population Change HC = 2.2% FL = 2.5% Avg. Population Added HC = 17,000 FL = 310,000 Avg. Annual Population Change HC = 1.3% FL = 1.0% Avg. Population Added HC = 22,000 FL = 244,000 NK: Add average number of people added in earlier years vs. going forward
8
Permitting Hillsborough County Permitting All homes (SFR + MFR)
10,000 Units per Year All homes (SFR + MFR)
9
Traditional Schools Built
Schools Built vs. Population Growth (Historical) Average of 3 Schools per Year Average of 5 Schools per Year Updated 3/30/17 Min. # Schools 1.5 / Year
10
Student Generation Rates Traditional Students
Comparison - All Homes to Homes Built Residential Land Use All Homes Homes Built (2000+) % Change Single Family Detached 0.415 0.555 34% Townhouse 0.235 0.247 5% Mobile Home 0.346 -29% Multi-Family 0.206 0.183 -11% Total/Weighted Avg. 0.334 0.386 16%
11
Charter Students Ratio of Charter to Traditional Students
2014+ Average = 9% Average = 6% Average = 2% Updated 3/30/17
12
Charter Students Charter Students Added by School Level
Based on distribution of Charter Schools SGR Type Charter Schools SGR % Used in Projections Traditional SGR% Elementary 0.015 55% 49% Middle 0.009 30% 21% High 0.004 15% Total/ Weighted Avg. 0.028 100%
13
Summary of Traditional Schools Needed
Total Schools ( ) Area Minimum Probable Countywide 23 38 North/West 1 North/East 3 6 South 20 31 Average Schools per Year Area/Time Frame Minimum Probable Countywide 1.5 2.5 Historical: 3 5
14
Summary/Key Findings Maintenance/Debt Cost vs. Available Revenues
( ) Category Figure Maintenance Needs $2.51 B Debt Service Payments $1.01 B Total Cost $3.52 B Available Revenue: Capital Millage $1.85 B Community Investment Tax $0.47 B Total Revenue $2.32 B Shortfall -$1.20 B
15
New Capacity Needs vs. Available Funding
Summary/Key Findings New Capacity Needs vs. Available Funding ( ) Category Minimum Probable New School Capacity Cost $0.77 B $1.18 B Portables* $0.23 B $0.03 B Total Cost $1.00 B $1.21 B Impact Fees at Current Rate $0.57 B Shortfall -$0.43 B -$0.64 B Impact Fees at Increased Rate $0.89 B -$0.11 B -$0.32 B Potential School Capital Surtax $1.89 B * Portables cannot be funded with impact fee revenues.
16
Community Investment Tax
17
School Capital Outlay Surtax
18
Summary/Key Findings Total Schools Type Min Probable Elem 14 25 Middle
School Needs North/West Type Min Prob. ES 0 1 MS 0 0 HS 0 0 Total 0 1 School Needs North/East Type Min Probable ES 3 5 MS 0 0 HS 0 1 Total 3 6 Total Schools Type Min Probable Elem 14 25 Middle 3 5 High 6 8 Total 23 38 NK: What year is this map for? All three, 2022, 27, and 32 appear on clicks (Bottom Left Corner) 2017: 98% System Capacity 2022: Doby (105% System Capacity) 2027: Sessums, Doby, Reddick, Knights and Frost (109% System Capacity) 2032: Doby (2), Reddick, Cypress Creek, Stowers, Summerfield Crossings, Summerfield Elem and Knights (110% System Capacity) School Needs - South Type Min Probable ES 11 19 MS 3 5 HS 6 7 Total 20 31
19
The complete presentation can be found at:
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.