1. Standards Review for 2017 Board Adoption
K-12 Mathematics
Standards Review for 2017 Board Adoption
This is a public meeting.
Important that our work follows a very intentional, rational, and deliberate process all focused on ensuring the best set of standards for our students that will help fulfill the Board’s vision for each Kansas student.

2. Part of what should be driving our work.
How can the standards we create contribute to this vision?

3. New Vision-Aligned Outcomes
Kindergarten readiness
Increase graduation rates
Increase percentage of students completing a credential or pursuing post-secondary education.
Individual plan of study focused on career interest for each student (including civic engagement)
Social/emotional factors relative to student success are to be measured locally.

4. The Charge Review Current K-12 Mathematics Standards
Engage in Honest, In-Depth Conversation Regarding
Kansas K-12 Students, Current Math Standards, and Potential Changes
Produce Updated K-12 Math Standards (if necessary)
Present Updated K-12 Math Standards to the Kansas State Board of Education (Late Summer/Fall 2017)

5. Non-negotiables Having Standards
Instructional Standards for Every Grade K-12
Board Approval
Assessable
Alignment to portrait of a successful student (ACTE + Civic Engagement)
Alignment to Rose Standards
Clear Justification for all Changes/Revisions
Academic, Cognitive, Technical, and Employability

6. Things to ponder No changes Completely New Standards
Create supplemental support documents?(Appendix A)
Address content currently outside the scope of math?
Organization of Standards

7. 2015 Online Survey And the survey says…
They will all be getting it in the Google folder. There were 724 comments.

8. Other considerations
• Commissioner and Board’s Social-Emotional Focus • Alignment with other content area standards (Science, ELP, etc.) • Standards vs. Assessment (Important when reading feedback) • Degree of detail (e.g., should there be an i.e., an e.g.?)

9. Meeting “Flow” Who: What: When: Where: Why: Who: What: When: Where:
Writing Group
What:
2-Day Meeting
When:
May 11th & 12th
Where:
Topeka
Why:
Complete Draft 1
Who:
Review Group
What:
Virtual Work
When:
June-August
Where:
, Google
Why:
Develop Draft 2
Who:
Full Committee
What:
1-Day Meeting
When:
March 2017
Where:
Topeka
Why:
Develop Draft 3
Things will be happening in between all of this (like State Board updates, Impact Institute and Annual Conference sharing), but these are the major meetings and “events”.

10. Sharing of Files and Resources
Google Folder
Current Math Standards
Rose Standards
SECD Standards
Other content area standards (Science)
Docs from ACT, SAT, Workeys, ASVAB, NAEP
Other State Standards
Appendix A
Progression Documents
Learning Trajectories

11. Group Member “Assignments”
Writing
Review
K – 5 Maria Ortiz-Smith Lynette Sharlow Brian Shelton Debbie Thompson – Chair 6 – 8 Jerry Braun Danira Fernandez-Flores Sherri Martinie Elizabeth Peyser 9 – 12 Cherrly Delacruz Kim Lackey Sheila Meggers John Scoggins Sarah Stevens Rich Wilson
K – 5 Bonnie Austin Jamie Junker Suzie Legg Connie Schrock Lucas Shivers 6 – 8 Elisa Dorian Maureen Engen Sherry Kinderknecht Jenny Wilcox 9 – 12 Jessica Barger Christopher Carter – Chair Larry Diepenbrock Kelli Ireton Rhonda Willis
However, we will structure our meetings in such a way to ensure vertical alignment and collaborative “checks and balances” between and within groups.

12. Ad Hoc Members
Mickey DeHook – Parent Representative Shana Gorton – Parent Representative Paula Hough – MTSS Representative Lisa Lajoie-Smith – KATM Representative Deb Matthews – KSDE Special Education Assessment Alicia Stoltenberg – CETE Math Test Development Coordinator Vera Stroup-Rentier – KSDE Early Childhood Special Education William (Bill) Thompson – Business & Industry Representative

13. To ponder for first in-person meeting…
“Big ideas” (Slides 6 and 8)
Documents in Google folder
Review and “mark up” a copy of current standards
Possible Resources
Organization of current standards

14. Commitment
Role
Virtual (Meetings held in this format will be approximately two hours in length.)
In-Person (Number of Days)
Writing Workgroup
1 (2 hours total meeting time)
3 (plus optional Summer Impact Institute and KSDE Annual Conference presentations)
Review/Revision Workgroup
2 (4 hours total meeting time)
1 (plus optional Summer Impact Institute and KSDE Annual Conference presentations)
Committee Chairpersons
Virtual meetings as needed for review work
In addition to what is listed above, 3 additional days and 4 regional evening meetings (unless otherwise delegated)
More information about approximate meeting dates is included on the timeline/calendar document.

15. Questions?