Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Networking vs. Timesharing

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Networking vs. Timesharing"— Presentation transcript:

1 Networking vs. Timesharing
Mainframe: OS 370 PC, Win98 Mac OS X 10.1 Server, Unix Protocol PC, Win2000 Terminals, Consoles

2 Local Area Network Emerged, 1970’s
Chicago Boston Seattle NYC Denver SF LA Houston Local Area Network Emerged, 1970’s

3 Local Area Network (LAN)
Range: The same building, same floor, same lab, same department. Within about 50 M’s. Computers: Micro Computers, Workstations; usually, but not necessarily, the same platform. Purposes: Sharing resources, e.g., printers, files, (Internet access), programs, internal exchange. PC, Win98 Mac OS X 10.1 Server, Unix Protocol PC, Win2000

4 The way in which the computers connected.
Topology of LAN The way in which the computers connected. Bus Topology Ring Topology Star Topology Direct Topology

5 IBM Token Ring 3 5 *%ooo… 4 2 $$100…… 4 2 $$100…… 3 4 **ABCD**
Free Token There is only one token circulating in the ring, and the computer that has the token gets the access to the cable. Busy Token To From Data 3 5 *%ooo… 1 4 2 $$100…… 5 4 2 $$100…… 3 4 **ABCD** 4  2 2 3  4 4 These processes can be done by hardware. Conventions: format, the size of a token, the speed of the token. How to prevent starvation? 2  3 3

6 Ethernet IEEE 802.3 Standard CSMA/CD
Carrier Sense Multiple Access/ Collision Detection Ethernet 5 1 3 jar 100 Mb/sec 4 2 A packet: 128 bytes, = 1024 bits (ms, 10-3 sec) Listen and send Collision

7 Wide Area Network , early 80’s
Chicago Boston CNY Seattle NYC Denver SF LA Houston Wide Area Network , early 80’s

8 WAN  Backbone Network ARPANET CSNET NSFNET ANSNET Chicago Boston CNY
Seattle NYC Denver SF ARPANET CSNET NSFNET ANSNET LA LA Houston WAN  Backbone Network


Download ppt "Networking vs. Timesharing"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google