Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Disabled Adult Transit Service:
Shift Design Optimization and Demand Forecasting Team: Mike Clay Yvan Fortier Chris Samuel
2
Agenda PART A: Shift Design Optimization Problem Solution Methodology
Analysis Results Risk PART B: Demand Forecasting Problem Solution Methodology Analysis Risk Results Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks
3
Executive Summary
4
Executive Summary: Part A
Part-Time Shifts Full-Time Shifts Daily Cost and An increase in the amount of part time shifts and less full time shifts will reduce overtime hours paid out. It will be effective in reducing daily operator cost while still meeting same level of demand Productivity
5
Executive Summary: Part B
1. Redirecting 2. Optimizing 3. Centralizing Cost Containment Strategies: Operating Expenses: 197% Number of Employees: 268% Number of Vehicles: 215% Demand for DATS: 234% Forecast:
6
Shift Design Optimization
Part A: Shift Design Optimization
7
Problem
8
Review the Effectiveness Overtime Reduction Perspective
Problem Review the Effectiveness of Part-Time Shifts Maintain or Increase Service Level with a Greater Mix of Shifts Overtime Reduction Perspective in Reducing Daily Operator Cost Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks
9
Solution
10
Solution Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks
Minimize Labour Cost Increase Operator Utilization Optimal Shift Design Model Efficacy of Part-Time Shifts Minimize labour cost and increase/maintain operator utilization Lowering workers scheduled during peak times Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks
11
Methodology
12
Methodology Shift Scheduling Model built in Excel
Queueing ToolPak (QTP) Review Current Shift Schedule Demand Supply Constraints Utilization Input Various Shift Combinations Cost Benefit Analysis Excel based model Queueing toolpak Cost benefit analysis of current shift design vs potential shifts Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks
13
Analysis
14
Daily Wheelchair Demand
Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks
15
WC Demand vs. Scheduled Operators
1.9872… Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks
16
FT Shifts vs. PT Shifts 10.61% of staff PT.. 14 of 132 Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks
17
Current Operator Utilization
Avg 56%, max 126, min 5% Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks
18
Monthly OT Costs ( ) Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks
19
Results
20
Results Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks
Current = 62 8, 17 10, 9PT ………FT <79… , 45, 8, 8 5…83tot Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks
21
Utilization: Old vs. New
Avg 56%, max 126, min 5% Newbies- avg 61%. Not as steep of slope, smoothed Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks
22
Chosen Shift Blend Maximum daily cost savings of $1093. savings of nearly $560 ($ yrly)…. Employ 10 less ppl on an avg basis…..Raise wages by 3.92%, $14,258.28 $14,052.98 Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks
23
Risks
24
Risks Higher utilization = More work for operators
decreased worker quality of life Average trips made per shift will decrease Employees prefer full-time shifts and overtime hours Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Results - Risks
25
Part B: Demand Forecasting
26
Problem
27
Problem Population of Edmonton: increasing changing Demand for DATS:
Resulting in: planning challenges fiscal constraints Requiring: forecast of future demand forecast of impacts Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Risks – Results
28
Solution
29
Solution Cost Containment Strategies Population of Edmonton:
age gender Disabled Population of Edmonton Impacts on DATS: vehicles employees operating expenses Demand for DATS Cost Containment Strategies Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Risks – Results
30
Methodology
31
Methodology Forecasting the Population of Edmonton
Disabled Population of Edmonton Forecasting the Demand for DATS Forecasting the Impacts on DATS Drivers of Disability Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Risks – Results
32
Analysis
33
Population of Edmonton
Growth: total = 29% 65+ = 99% Growth: total = 1% 65+ = 4% Growth: total = 17% 65+ = 93% Historical: Forecast: Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Risks – Results
34
Disabled Population of Edmonton
Growth: total = 72% 65+ = 133% Growth: total = 62% 65+ = 125% Growth: total = 24% 65+ = 31% Historical: Forecast: Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Risks - Results
35
Demand For DATS Growth: total = 256% 65+ = 460% Growth: total = 234%
65+ = 422% Growth: total = 167% 65+ = 302% Historical: Forecast: Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Risks - Results
36
Number Of Vehicles Growth: 235% Growth: 29% Growth: 215%
Historical: Forecast: Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Risks - Results
37
Number Of Employees Growth: 293% Growth: 66% Growth: 268%
Historical: Forecast: Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Risks - Results
38
Total Operating Expenses
Growth: 215% Growth: 52% Growth: 197% Historical: Forecast: Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Risks - Results
39
Risks
40
Demand For DATS Average Range = 29% Average Range = 29%
Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Risks – Results
41
Number Of Vehicles Average Range per Range in Demand = 0.95
Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Risks - Results
42
Number Of Employees Average Range per Range in Demand = 1.08
Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Risks - Results
43
Total Operating Expenses
Average Range per Range in Demand = 0.90 Average Range per Range in Demand = 0.90 Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Risks - Results
44
Results
45
Results Cost Containment Strategies Redirecting to Optimizing shift
schedule Redirecting to other assisted transportation services Cost Containment Strategies Centralizing pick-ups and drop-offs Problem – Solution – Methodology – Analysis – Risks – Results
46
Key Findings
47
More PT Key Findings – Part A Less OT
Higher Utilization With a greater balance of PT and FT shifts, OT will be reduced Demand will be more effectively met from a cost perspective with the same service level
48
Key Findings – Part B Demand for DATS will grow significantly:
234% - 256% Will cause significant impacts: operating expenses increase by: 197% - 215% Can be managed with cost containment strategies: redirecting optimizing centralizing
49
Questions
50
Appendix
51
Appendix – Part A Threshold Time – 30 min Service Level - .99
Arrival Rate – Demand from 2 periods ahead averaged Service Rate* – per hour per quarter hour Queue Capacity – infinite Lagg SIPP (stationary independent period by period) approach MMS – Poisson Distribution, inter-event times (no exact info about next pickup) *Service Rate = average(total passengers carried per operator / hours worked by operator)
52
Appendix – Part A ASSUMPTIONS Demand = SCHED_WC – CANCEL_WC
Demand broken down into weekday and weekend demand No break time. Only current shift schedule includes split shifts Tours 0.5hrs than actual length
53
Appendix – Part A CONSTRAINTS 10 PT per day Avg. Wage
54
Appendix – Part A Labour Costs Different Costs of Shift Combinations
55
Appendix – Part A
56
Appendix – Part A
57
Appendix – Part B: Data Limitations and Assumptions
Profiled only by age, not also by gender No data on disabled population of Edmonton Data only on disabled Alberta for 2001 and 2006 Two data sets are insufficient for MVR Two data sets only allows forecasting by SLR DATS only tracks registered clients, not inquiries Two data sets are insufficient for MVR Two data sets only allows forecasting by SLR Assumed: only cost driver is number of clients no intervention by decision makers no changes in productivity
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.