Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Why is this important? Requirement Understand research articles

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Why is this important? Requirement Understand research articles"— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Why is this important? Requirement Understand research articles
Do research for yourself Real world

3 The Three Goals of this Course
1) Teach a new way of thinking 2) Teach “factoids”

4 Mean But here is the formula == so what you did was
= 320 320 / 4 = 80

5 r =

6 What you have learned! Describing and Exploring Data / The Normal Distribution Scales of measurement Populations vs. Samples Learned how to organize scores of one variable using: frequency distributions graphs

7 What you have learned! Measures of central tendency Variability Mean
Median Mode Variability Range IQR Standard Deviation Variance

8 What you have learned! Z Scores Find the percentile of a give score
Find the score for a given percentile

9 What you have learned! Sampling Distributions & Hypothesis Testing
Is this quarter fair? Sampling distribution CLT The probability of a given score occurring

10 What you have learned! Basic Concepts of Probability
Joint probabilities Conditional probabilities Different ways events can occur Permutations Combinations The probability of winning the lottery Binomial Distributions Probability of winning the next 4 out of 10 games of Blingoo

11 What you have learned! Categorical Data and Chi-Square
Chi square as a measure of independence Phi coefficient Chi square as a measure of goodness of fit

12 What you have learned! Hypothesis Testing Applied to Means
One Sample t-tests Two Sample t-tests Equal N Unequal N Dependent samples

13 What you have learned! Correlation and Regression Correlation

14 What you have learned! Alternative Correlational Techniques
Pearson Formulas Point-Biserial Phi Coefficent Spearman’s rho Non-Pearson Formulas Kendall’s Tau

15 What you have learned! Multiple Regression Common applications
Causal Models Standardized vs. unstandarized Multiple R Semipartical correlations Common applications Mediator Models Moderator Mordels

16 What you have learned! Simple Analysis of Variance ANOVA
Computation of ANOVA Logic of ANOVA Variance Expected Mean Square Sum of Squares

17 What you have learned! Multiple Comparisons Among Treatment Means
What to do with an omnibus ANOVA Multiple t-tests Linear Contrasts Orthogonal Contrasts Trend Analysis Controlling for Type I errors Bonferroni t Fisher Least Significance Difference Studentized Range Statistic Dunnett’s Test

18 What you have learned! Factorial Analysis of Variance Factorial ANOVA
Computation and logic of Factorial ANOVA Interpreting Results Main Effects Interactions

19 What you have learned! Factorial Analysis of Variance and Repeated Measures Factorial ANOVA Computation and logic of Factorial ANOVA Interpreting Results Main Effects Interactions Repeated measures ANOVA

20 The Three Goals of this Course
1) Teach a new way of thinking 2) Teach “factoids” 3) Self-confidence in statistics

21

22 Remember You just invented a “magic math pill” that will increase test scores. On the day of the first test you give the pill to 4 subjects. When these same subjects take the second test they do not get a pill Did the pill increase their test scores?

23 What if. . . You just invented a “magic math pill” that will increase test scores. On the day of the first test you give a full pill to 4 subjects. When these same subjects take the second test they get a placebo. When these same subjects that the third test they get no pill.

24 Note You have more than 2 groups You have a repeated measures design
You need to conduct a Repeated Measures ANOVA

25 Tests to Compare Means Design of experiment
Independent Variables and # of levels Independent Samples Related Samples One IV, 2 levels Independent t-test Paired-samples t-test One IV, 2 or more levels ANOVA Repeated measures ANOVA Tow IVs, each with 2 or more levels Factorial ANOVA Repeated measures factorial ANOVA

26 What if. . . You just invented a “magic math pill” that will increase test scores. On the day of the first test you give a full pill to 4 subjects. When these same subjects take the second test they get a placebo. When these same subjects that the third test they get no pill.

27 Results Pill Placebo No Pill Sub 1 57 60 64 Sub 2 71 72 74 Sub 3 75 76
78 Sub 4 93 92 96 Mean

28 For now . . . Ignore that it is a repeated design
Pill Placebo No Pill Sub 1 57 60 64 Sub 2 71 72 74 Sub 3 75 76 78 Sub 4 93 92 96 Mean

29 Pill Placebo No Pill Sub 1 57 60 64 Sub 2 71 72 74 Sub 3 75 76 78
93 92 96 Mean Between Variability = low

30 Pill Placebo No Pill Sub 1 57 60 64 Sub 2 71 72 74 Sub 3 75 76 78
93 92 96 Mean Within Variability = high

31

32 Pill Placebo No Pill Sub 1 57 60 64 Sub 2 71 72 74 Sub 3 75 76 78
Notice – the within variability of a group can be predicted by the other groups Pill Placebo No Pill Sub 1 57 60 64 Sub 2 71 72 74 Sub 3 75 76 78 Sub 4 93 92 96 Mean

33 Pill Placebo No Pill Sub 1 57 60 64 Sub 2 71 72 74 Sub 3 75 76 78
Notice – the within variability of a group can be predicted by the other groups Pill Placebo No Pill Sub 1 57 60 64 Sub 2 71 72 74 Sub 3 75 76 78 Sub 4 93 92 96 Mean Pill and Placebo r = .99; Pill and No Pill r = .99; Placebo and No Pill r = .99

34 Pill Placebo No Pill Mean Sub 1 57 60 64 60.33 Sub 2 71 72 74 72.33
75 76 78 76.33 Sub 4 93 92 96 93.66 These scores are correlated because, in general, some subjects tend to do very well and others tended to do very poorly

35 Repeated ANOVA Some of the variability of the scores within a group occurs due to the mean differences between subjects. Want to calculate and then discard the variability that comes from the differences between the subjects.

36 Example Pill Placebo No Pill Mean Sub 1 57 60 64 60.33 Sub 2 71 72 74
72.33 Sub 3 75 76 78 76.33 Sub 4 93 92 96 93.66 75.66

37 Sum of Squares SS Total Computed the same way as before
The total deviation in the observed scores Computed the same way as before

38 Pill Placebo No Pill Mean Sub 1 57 60 64 60.33 Sub 2 71 72 74 72.33
75 76 78 76.33 Sub 4 93 92 96 93.66 75.66 SStotal = ( )2+ ( ) ( )2 = 908 *What makes this value get larger?

39 Pill Placebo No Pill Mean Sub 1 57 60 64 60.33 Sub 2 71 72 74 72.33
75 76 78 76.33 Sub 4 93 92 96 93.66 75.66 SStotal = ( )2+ ( ) ( )2 = 908 *What makes this value get larger? *The variability of the scores!

40 Sum of Squares SS Subjects
Represents the SS deviations of the subject means around the grand mean Its multiplied by k to give an estimate of the population variance (Central limit theorem)

41 Pill Placebo No Pill Mean Sub 1 57 60 64 60.33 Sub 2 71 72 74 72.33
75 76 78 76.33 Sub 4 93 92 96 93.66 75.66 SSSubjects = 3(( )2+ ( ) ( )2) = 1712 *What makes this value get larger?

42 Pill Placebo No Pill Mean Sub 1 57 60 64 60.33 Sub 2 71 72 74 72.33
75 76 78 76.33 Sub 4 93 92 96 93.66 75.66 SSSubjects = 3(( )2+ ( ) ( )2) = 1712 *What makes this value get larger? *Differences between subjects

43 Sum of Squares SS Treatment
Represents the SS deviations of the treatment means around the grand mean Its multiplied by n to give an estimate of the population variance (Central limit theorem)

44 Pill Placebo No Pill Mean Sub 1 57 60 64 60.33 Sub 2 71 72 74 72.33
75 76 78 76.33 Sub 4 93 92 96 93.66 75.66 SSTreatment = 4(( )2+ ( )2+( )2) = 34.66 *What makes this value get larger?

45 Pill Placebo No Pill Mean Sub 1 57 60 64 60.33 Sub 2 71 72 74 72.33
75 76 78 76.33 Sub 4 93 92 96 93.66 75.66 SSTreatment = 4(( )2+ ( )2+( )2) = 34.66 *What makes this value get larger? *Differences between treatment groups

46 Sum of Squares Have a measure of how much all scores differ
SSTotal Have a measure of how much this difference is due to subjects SSSubjects Have a measure of how much this difference is due to the treatment condition SSTreatment To compute error simply subtract!

47 Sum of Squares SSError = SSTotal - SSSubjects – SSTreatment
8.0 =

48 Compute df Source df SS Subjects 1712.00 Treatment 34.66 Error 8.00
df total = N -1 Source df SS Subjects Treatment 34.66 Error 8.00 Total 11

49 Compute df Source df SS Subjects 3 1712.00 Treatment 34.66 Error 8.00
df total = N -1 df subjects = n – 1 Source df SS Subjects 3 Treatment 34.66 Error 8.00 Total 11

50 Compute df Source df SS Subjects 3 1712.00 Treatment 2 34.66 Error
df total = N -1 df subjects = n – 1 df treatment = k-1 Source df SS Subjects 3 Treatment 2 34.66 Error 8.00 Total 11

51 Compute df Source df SS Subjects 3 1712.00 Treatment 2 34.66 Error 6
df total = N -1 df subjects = n – 1 df treatment = k-1 df error = (n-1)(k-1) Source df SS Subjects 3 Treatment 2 34.66 Error 6 8.00 Total 11

52 Compute MS Source df SS MS Subjects 3 1712.00 Treatment 2 34.66 17.33
Error 6 8.00 Total 11

53 Compute MS Source df SS MS Subjects 3 1712.00 Treatment 2 34.66 17.33
Error 6 8.00 1.33 Total 11

54 Compute F Source df SS MS F Subjects 3 1712.00 Treatment 2 34.66 17.33
13.00 Error 6 8.00 1.33 Total 11

55 Test F for Significance
Source df SS MS F Subjects 3 Treatment 2 34.66 17.33 13.00 Error 6 8.00 1.33 Total 11

56 Test F for Significance
Source df SS MS F Subjects 3 Treatment 2 34.66 17.33 13.00* Error 6 8.00 1.33 Total 11 F(2,6) critical = 5.14

57 Test F for Significance
Source df SS MS F Subjects 3 Treatment 2 34.66 17.33 13.00* Error 6 8.00 1.33 Total 11 F(2,6) critical = 5.14

58

59 Additional tests Source df SS MS F Subjects 3 1712.00 Treatment 2
34.66 17.33 13.00* Error 6 8.00 1.33 Total 11 Can investigate the meaning of the F value by computing t-tests and Fisher’s LSD

60 Remember

61 Pill Placebo No Pill Mean 74 75 78 75.66

62 Pill Placebo No Pill Mean 74 75 78 75.66 Pill vs. Placebo

63 Pill Placebo No Pill Mean 74 75 78 75.66 Pill vs. Placebo t=1.23

64 Pill Placebo No Pill Mean 74 75 78 75.66 Pill vs. Placebo t=1.23
t (6) critical = 2.447

65 Pill Placebo No Pill Mean 74 75 78 75.66 Pill vs. Placebo t=1.23
Pill vs. No Pill t =4.98* t (6) critical = 2.447

66 Pill Placebo No Pill Mean 74 75 78 75.66 Pill vs. Placebo t=1.23
Pill vs. No Pill t =4.98* Placebo vs. No Pill t =3.70* t (6) critical = 2.447

67 Practice You wonder if the statistic tests are of all equal difficulty. To investigate this you examine the scores 4 students got on the three different tests. Examine this question and (if there is a difference) determine which tests are significantly different.

68 Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Sub 1 60 70 78 Sub 2 76 85 Sub 3 64 90 89 Sub 4 77 81 94

69

70

71 SPSS Homework – Bonus 1) Determine if practice had an effect on test scores. 2) Examine if there is a linear trend with practice on test scores.

72

73 Four Step When Solving a Problem
1) Read the problem 2) Decide what statistical test to use 3) Perform that procedure 4) Write an interpretation of the results

74 Four Step When Solving a Problem
1) Read the problem 2) Decide what statistical test to use 3) Perform that procedure 4) Write an interpretation of the results

75 Four Step When Solving a Problem
1) Read the problem 2) Decide what statistical test to use 3) Perform that procedure 4) Write an interpretation of the results

76 How do you know when to use what?
If you are given a word problem, would you know which statistic you should use?

77 Example An investigator wants to predict a male adult’s height from his length at birth. He obtains records of both measures from a sample of males.

78 `

79 Example An investigator wants to predict a male adult’s height from his length at birth. He obtains records of both measures from a sample of males. Use regression

80


Download ppt "Why is this important? Requirement Understand research articles"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google