Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

2017 Robot Priorities & Decision process

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "2017 Robot Priorities & Decision process"— Presentation transcript:

1 2017 Robot Priorities & Decision process

2 process Engineering Review Board met Sunday evening, 5:00 – 9:00 pm
Used QFD priority flow-down process Attributes  Capabilities (What)  Mechanisms (How) Attributes: What are the qualities of a great robot? Capabilities: What should the robot be able to do? From Sat & Sun breakout groups + Sat evening Strategy analysis Good Vigorous discussion & debate. Decisions by consensus. Clear list of priorities. Reviewed all report-out sheets in cafeteria. Great set of robot concepts and potential mechanisms Identified initial tasks & highest priority for prototyping: Identify a drive system that can quickly, easily, reliably cross all the B & D defenses

3 Engineering review board 2017
Doug Wildes Rose Barra Chris Mars Audrey McMahon Carl Springli Justin Page Mike Kimball Helen Gutelius Bobby VanNess Nikita Karpunin (Prototyping) Tom Vierling Wesley Turner (Design) Dana Walsh Mikayla Hugg (Manufacturing) Paul Myers Adam Dolezel (Assembly) Joe Barra Roland Rao (Programming) Other candidates: Isabel Rodrigues (Assembly), Sydney Walker (Programming) Jonathan LaFollette (Design mentor), Wes Turner (Programming mentor), J. Jay McMahon, Heather Myers

4 What are the qualities of a great robot?
Robot attributes What are the qualities of a great robot? Attributes Importance Score points (Win matches) 10 Earn ranking points (captain) Simple (mech & program) 8 Robust & Maintainable 7 → 8 Consistent performance 6 Design Low Risk Easy to drive & target 5 Good alliance partner / pickable How well will we achieve these? We’ll find out at competitions…

5 All possibilities, no priorities
Robot capabilities Score in High Goal Drive Fast Score High in contact w Boiler Don't get pushed askew Score High over another Robot Push Hopper w corner of robot Score High from beside Airship Move sideways to align w Goal, Peg, … Score High from near Hopper Push other Robots Be Agile Score in Low Goal Dump Fuel into other Robots Camera(s) for drivers Camera for High Goal alignment Place a Gear on a Peg Camera for Peg alignment Leave Gear on Peg (w/o Pilot) Vision auto-targeting Follow lines on field Climb a Rope Auto Collect Fuel from Floor Score a Gear Collect Fuel from Hopper or Load Station Load Fuel from Hopper Accept Fuel from other Robots Score Fuel in Boiler Catch missed High Goal shots Use field elements to align Collect Gear from Load Station Collect Gear from Floor Transport Fuel Load Gear & Fuel at same location Transport > 120 Fuel (1 RP in Tele) All possibilities, no priorities

6 “Quality Function Deployment”
Attributes Importance Place a Gear on a Peg Transport > 120 Fuel (1 RP in Tele) Collect Gear from Load Station Camera(s) for drivers Catch missed High Goal shots Collect Fuel from Hopper Collect Fuel from Floor Drive Fast Don't get pushed askew Load Gear & Fuel at same location Score in Low Goal Auto: score points Accept Fuel from other Robots Climb a Rope Score in High Goal Move sideways to align w Goal, Peg, … Collect Gear from Floor Total Earn ranking points (captain) 10 M H L 650 Score points (Win matches) 890 Robust & Maintainable 8 840 Simple (mech & program) 696 Consistent performance 6 570 Design Low Risk 522 Easy to drive & target 5 455 Good alliance partner / pickable 395 386 378 372 356 336 332 324 318 302 300 292 280 266 256 248 138 134 QFD “Quality Function Deployment” Capabilities Risk vs. Reward Tradeoff

7 Capabilities

8 Major mechanisms & tradeoffs
Reward Risk Fuel in High Goal 6 8 Fuel in Low Goal 2 4 Fuel from Floor & Ball Path 5 Fuel from Hopper or Load Station 3 Gear on Peg, wait for Pilot 1 Gear on Peg & drive away Climb Rope 7 10 2-Speed Drive Gearbox One person’s view, not team consensus!

9 Scoring & Strategy Fuel to High Goal to 40 kPa = 1 RP is a good 1-robot strategy 3 cycles & 65% accuracy = 50 points + 1 RP MAX 200 points (5/sec x 2 min / 3 fuel/point) Necessary to rank high in Regionals Gears to 4 Rotors is a better 2-robot strategy 12 cycles = 160 points + 1 RP or 100 bonus = 260 points Necessary to do well in Playoffs & at Championship

10 Prototyping priorities & Leaders
Can we reliably score in the High Goal? Bobby – conveyor Carl – flywheel Mr. Van Tine - catapult Robot Concept models – Will it all fit? Wesley – low goal bot Tom V, Mike – high goal bots Include gear, climber, fuel handling Floor pickup & fuel path? Climb the Rope Floor Intake for Fuel Decision ASAP No later than Sunday AM


Download ppt "2017 Robot Priorities & Decision process"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google