Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Standard III Faculty.

Published byOwen Nash Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Standard III Faculty."— Presentation transcript:

1 Standard III Faculty

2 III.1 Faculty is capable of meeting program objectives
Not only this… But also this, for example… List of faculty with rank and areas of specialization Appendix providing current CVs of full-time and adjunct faculty Table that shows relationships between faculty, their expertise, and student learning outcomes III.1 Faculty is capable of meeting program objectives

3 III.2 High priority for teaching, research and service
Not only this… But also this, for example… Appendix with current CVs of faculty. Access to university policies for tenure and promotion Description of institutional resources to support teaching and research Descriptions of institutional incentives and/or rewards for teaching, research and service. Description of faculty review process related to teaching, research and service III.2 High priority for teaching, research and service

4 III.3 Polices support recruiting and retaining diverse faculty
Not only this… But also this, for example… List of faculty identifying racial and ethnic group representation Access to university policies for faculty recruitment Description of institutional resources for faculty retention Description of program initiatives to recruit and retain diverse faculty III.3 Polices support recruiting and retaining diverse faculty

5 Not only this… But also this , for example… List of institutional resources to support faculty expertise in pedagogy and technology List of faculty engagement in activities to enhance expertise in pedagogy and technology Table demonstrating faculty activities within relevant professional organizations Table showing faculty scores in student evaluation criteria related to relevant pedagogy and technology III.4 Faculty qualified in designated areas, technology, and pedagogy; active in relevant organizations.

6 III.5 Sustained records of scholarship/research
Not only this… But also this, for example… Appendix with current faculty CVs Table showing quantity of faculty scholarly/professional works classified as peer-review journals, book chapters, peer-review presentations, editorial works, reviews, etc. over the program review cycle. III.5 Sustained records of scholarship/research

7 Not only this… But also this, for example… Appendix of current faculty CVs Table showing institutions granting faculty degrees, type of terminal degree (e.g.., PhD, JD, EdD), area of study emphasis III.6 Advanced degrees from various institutions; diversity of backgrounds

8 III.7 Faculty assignments match program needs and competencies
Not only this… But also this, for example… List of faculty areas of expertise Matrix showing areas of faculty expertise aligned with teaching assignments III.7 Faculty assignments match program needs and competencies

9 III.8 Systematic faculty evaluation
Not only this… But also this, for example… Access to institutional policies regarding faculty review Description of program-level faculty including, who is reviewed (e.g., full-time/part-time, tenured/non-tenured, etc.) and by whom (e.g., students, peers, program head), and how often III.8 Systematic faculty evaluation

10 III.9 Data to substantiate evaluation of faculty
Not only this… But also this, for example… Reference to institutional policies and procedures Timeline showing faculty evaluation schedules indicating completion of formal faculty evaluations over the review cycle List of tenure/promotion decisions over review cycle III.9 Data to substantiate evaluation of faculty

11 III.10 Results of faculty evaluation used to improve program and plan
Not only this… But also this, for example… Summaries of faculty accomplishments in teaching, research and service List of program improvements supported through evaluation of faculty, e.g., additional support (time or funds) for research, changes to teaching assignments, decisions related to adjunct faculty assignments, etc. III.10 Results of faculty evaluation used to improve program and plan

12 Suggestions for Standard III documentation
Use graphics to represent process Give concrete examples Use tables to organize information Use timelines to illustrate process Suggestions for Standard III documentation

Download ppt "Standard III Faculty."

Similar presentations

Presented by: Jerry Legge Associate Provost for Academic Planning (Interim), and Professor of Public Administration and Policy (SPIA) Provost Advisory.

Presented by: Jerry Legge Associate Provost for Academic Planning (Interim), and Professor of Public Administration and Policy (SPIA) Provost Advisory.
1 Whats All This Fuss About Promotion & Tenure? Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine.

1 Whats All This Fuss About Promotion & Tenure? Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine.
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.

Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Faculty Affairs presents:. PPCs  Consist of 3 or 5 members  Are selected based on Program Personnel Standards (i.e. one per program or one per faculty.

Faculty Affairs presents:. PPCs  Consist of 3 or 5 members  Are selected based on Program Personnel Standards (i.e. one per program or one per faculty.
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Assessment, data analysis and evaluation of findings as essential components of the self study for determining if objectives.

ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Assessment, data analysis and evaluation of findings as essential components of the self study for determining if objectives.
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant

Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
AdvanceVT Mentoring. Let’s Benchmark: Who Does Mentoring Well? 2008 Faculty Worklife Survey, 700 tenure- track faculty responses (53% RR); College RRs.

AdvanceVT Mentoring. Let’s Benchmark: Who Does Mentoring Well? 2008 Faculty Worklife Survey, 700 tenure- track faculty responses (53% RR); College RRs.
NWCCU Standard 2 - Educational Program and Its Effectiveness Bea Babbitt & Francisco Menendez October 29, 2008 SU 219 Bea Babbitt & Francisco Menendez.

NWCCU Standard 2 - Educational Program and Its Effectiveness Bea Babbitt & Francisco Menendez October 29, 2008 SU 219 Bea Babbitt & Francisco Menendez.
Developing a Narrative and Portfolio for Personnel Review at UIS Nathan Steele Chair, Personnel Policies Committee April 2015.

Developing a Narrative and Portfolio for Personnel Review at UIS Nathan Steele Chair, Personnel Policies Committee April 2015.
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.

Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
Standard Four: Faculty Michael Connolly, D.M.A. University of Portland Michael Connolly, D.M.A. University of Portland.

Standard Four: Faculty Michael Connolly, D.M.A. University of Portland Michael Connolly, D.M.A. University of Portland.
Cathy Jordan, PhD Associate Professor of Pediatrics Director, Children, Youth and Family Consortium University of Minnesota Member, Community Campus Partnerships.

Cathy Jordan, PhD Associate Professor of Pediatrics Director, Children, Youth and Family Consortium University of Minnesota Member, Community Campus Partnerships.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.

Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
2015 UTIA P&T Workshop. UTK Faculty Handbook….  Section 3.11.3.1 Faculty Review & Evaluation p 18  Section 3.11.3 Probationary Period p 21 UTK Manual.

2015 UTIA P&T Workshop. UTK Faculty Handbook….  Section Faculty Review & Evaluation p 18  Section Probationary Period p 21 UTK Manual.
OCTOBER 4, 2012 Tenure and Promotion Workshop. Today’s Agenda Execution of Mission, Vision and Goals Criteria for Tenure and Promotion FAQ’s E-Faculty.

OCTOBER 4, 2012 Tenure and Promotion Workshop. Today’s Agenda Execution of Mission, Vision and Goals Criteria for Tenure and Promotion FAQ’s E-Faculty.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Rhonda Dick, M.D. Tim Martin, M.D.

PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Rhonda Dick, M.D. Tim Martin, M.D.
Chapter 2 Educating for Social Work. History of Social Work Education 1800s – Mostly apprenticeship model Early 1900s – Development of formal social work.

Chapter 2 Educating for Social Work. History of Social Work Education 1800s – Mostly apprenticeship model Early 1900s – Development of formal social work.
Leading Change. THE ROLE OF POLICY IN CHANGE Leading Change – The Role of Policy Drift to Quantitative Compliance- Behavior will focus on whatever is.

Leading Change. THE ROLE OF POLICY IN CHANGE Leading Change – The Role of Policy Drift to Quantitative Compliance- Behavior will focus on whatever is.
Tenure and Promotion at Public PUI’s and R-1’s Cutting Edge 2007 Jean M. BahrJean M. Bahr and Kurt C. Friehauf.

Tenure and Promotion at Public PUI’s and R-1’s Cutting Edge 2007 Jean M. BahrJean M. Bahr and Kurt C. Friehauf.
Gerard L. Hanley, Ph.D. Executive Director, MERLOT Senior Director, California State University Using MERLOT To Support Retention, Tenure, and Promotion.

Gerard L. Hanley, Ph.D. Executive Director, MERLOT Senior Director, California State University Using MERLOT To Support Retention, Tenure, and Promotion.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google